Keiser Report: Exorbitant Privilege (Russia Today)

Britain and the US are in a mess, and it is much the same mess, and a good indicator of where we are is seen by looking towards the USA.

The British people entered WW2 with the worlds greatest Empire, the world's greatest Navy, and was still in the top three manufacturing powers.

By 1945, Great Britain was bust. Bankrupt. 

In the past fifty years, both the US and UK have removed the VAST majority of MANUFACTURING to China, India Brazil and other gutters of the Third World, and replaced that with - what? IT, Finance and Investments, and retail, much of it garbage low paid work, leaving the people with nothing to spend on anything but what they NEED, not what they want.

Five years. The present recession started in 2008..... watch the video ....

My God, we're in real trouble.

Norway killings being used to push Multicultural policy of the Frankfurt School's Culturalist Marxists.

D'oh! The Cops in Norway knew the killers name BEFORE his arrest:

Despite being portrayed by the media as inept due to the length of time it took them to reach the island of Utoeya, it has now emerged that police knew the name of gunman Anders Behring Breivik before they even arrested him, a startling admission that prompted one of Britain’s top news anchors to question how authorities were aware of the gunman’s identity in advance.
During his Channel 4 News broadcast on Friday evening, host Jon Snow asked “why police knew the killer’s name by the time they had arrived on the island,” reported the Telegraph live blog.
“He surrendered the moment police called his name 3 minutes after they arrived. What we don’t know is how the police knew the terrorist’s name before they arrested him,” said Snow, who is recognized as one of Britain’s most trusted news anchors, and cannot be dismissed as a “conspiracy theorist”.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/police-knew-gunmans-name-before-arrest.html

They haven't been able to make Multiculturalism work spontaneously, in the Western nations, so now these terrible State organised and controlled actions in Norway are going to be the lynch-pin to forcing acceptance of Multiculturalism, with the fear of being seen as a "Terrorist", "Nazi" or potential murderer. 
This whole conspiracy is to switch the fear rhetoric of the tyrannous scum who operate Western governments, from Islamic terrorism (tired, wearing thin) , to "Homegrown" terrorism (the terrorists are everywhere, you can't identify them etc). ID cards, more CCTV, longer holding by the Police without charge blah blah blah ..... The Sky News reports that the Police (front men for MI5) are already attacking legitimate political organisations in the UK: 

Scotland Yard's counter terrorism chief, assistant commissioner Cressida Dick, has been requested to supply specialist officers to join a new European task force dedicated to investigating European-wide far right links to a bomb attack in Oslo and a shooting spree on Utoya Island.
http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/World-News/Norway-Metropolitan-Police-To-Join-European-Wide-Force-Probing-Far-Right-Links-Of-Attacks-Suspect/Article/201107416036718?f=rss

His handlers in MOSSAD/CIA/MI6 couldn't even be bothered to create a "new" backstory for this patsy.

The 32 year-old appears to have quoted verbatim large sections from the preaching of Theodore Kaczynski in his 1500 page online rant.Breivik had “copied and pasted” almost a dozen key passages from the 69 year-old’s 35,000 manifesto, only changing particular words such as “leftist” with “cultural Marxist”.It remains unclear what his motivations were, but experts said it appeared he had taken “inspiration” from Kaczynski whose two decade parcel-bomb terror campaign killed three people and 29 injured others.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/norway/8658269/Norway-shooting-Anders-Behring-Breivik-plagiarised-Unabomber.html

They just rehashed someone else's ramblings. 

The whole story stinks: 

Given the fact that the establishment media got it spectacularly wrong by instantly jumping to the conclusion that Friday’s deadly attack in Norway was the work of Al-Qaeda Muslims, placing complete trust in the details emerging about gunman Anders Behring Breivik would be foolish, especially since there are innumerable inconsistencies and contradictions that need to be studied before a fuller picture of what motivated the bloodshed can be established.
The rush to blame Muslims for the carnage, hastily parroted by an onslaught of mainstream “terror experts,” was a startling insight into how the propaganda that fuels the war on terror is so unquestionably bounced around the echo chamber of the corporate media.
It’s also a reminder that the mainstream press instantly falls in line with whoever the establishment designates the enemy du jour to be at any given time. Now that Muslims have been so vehemently demonized as terrorists, it’s the turn of so called “right-wing extremists,” or anyone who disagrees with mass immigration, loss of sovereignty and globalist financial looting, to feel the heat.
The effort to smear European conservatives as unhinged radicals who harbor simmering urges for bloodlust is now in full swing, and it’s a demonization campaign firmly founded on the carefully crafted public portrayal of Anders Behring Breivik.

However, it’s quickly becoming apparent that just as many eyewitnesses reported two gunmen on the island where the rampage unfolded, there are two different personas behind Breivik himself.
Indeed, there are two different Facebook profiles for Breivik, one from before the massacre and one from after. The latter profile appears to have been embellished and deliberately altered to emphasize the notion that the gunman was motivated by his “Christian conservative” beliefs.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/anders-behring-breivik-manufacturing-a-patsy.html

Press TV, mouthpiece of the Islamic Theocracy of Iran, which really is a rather nasty vicious little State run by theological psychopaths, , is cock-a-hoop: 

Islam, and their useful white European idiots (such as this "Peter Ruston/ Chris Bamberry pairing in the video above)  are now empowered by the Elites to scream Hate, and Terrorist, at any disagreement with Islamic theological stances, and with attempting to turn the savage barbarian tide away from European shores. 
White people of Europe are in real trouble, worse than they have EVER been. rememberer: these hate ridden bastards - useful idiots of the Western oligarchies, are the true face of Islam. People in Europe aren't frightened of Islamics and Islam for reasons of terrorism,but because of the murder and mayhem prevalent in whatever society Islam gains control of. They need to go from Europe by choice or force. They do not belong here, any more than white folk belong in Iran, Saudi Arabia or Syria. 

Anyhow: these are interesting alternative media takes on the situation of the shooter and Norway:  : 

http://classicalvalues.com/2011/07/not-civilians-but-traitors-to-be-executed/

http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2011/07/25/knights-templar-honesty-and-hypocrisy/

http://thebuckshotter.blogspot.com/2011/07/oslo-bomber-is-freemason-and-zionist.html

Cild Porn daycare worker Vanessa Gorge, only a symptom of the institutional, organized child rape.

NB LINKS IN GREEN

This has happened before, and will, until we change things, certainly again. Britain is riddled with those whose depravity knows no bounds, and there is always someone willing to supply whatever is wanted at a price.

There have been publicly well known cases - Kincora,Northern Ireland,  Islington, London, the Irish Republican Army, the Roman Catholic church, and recently Holly Grieg in Aberdeen  - where children have been supplied to senor and powerful public figures to sate their disgusting sexual depravities.

Here's the interesting questions: just WHO were these depraved animals producing and supplying child pornography FOR? Who placed this woman in the postition she held at the nursery? Why will she NOT identify the children? Why does the story focus on Blanchard and George? Who were the other three women?

Let's start here:

Members of the Plymouth Safeguarding Children Board, which carried out the review, found the inspection regime was a "tick box" exercise and called for the government to look at the way checks are carried out by the regulator.

The board also called for the government to examine the way community-based, privately-run nurseries like Little Ted's are run to make sure they are monitored properly and staff are well trained.

George had been guilty of "inappropriate behaviour" before she was caught, including showing members of staff adult pornography and boasting about her sexual exploits. Because she was a senior worker, other staff did not feel able to challenge her, the review found.

George, 40, from Plymouth, was jailed last year for abusing toddlers. Using her mobile phone, she photographed children in her care as she abused them and shared the images with her accomplice, Manchester businessmen Colin Blanchard.

Four women, including George, and Blanchard have been convicted of making and sharing images of abuse. Prosecutors said they were part of "one of the most sickening paedophile rings this country has seen".

(LINK) The Guardian (UK) 4th November 2010

So: how was this woman placed into this position? Who were the referees? Why was there no formal interviews held? Who sat on the board of trustees, who were the managers, who were responsible for the appointment and activities of this woman?

There are no records of the post being advertised, nor is there any evidence that references were taken up or that a formal interview took place.

It was a privately-run community nursery and new staff were often friends of managers or trustees. However, George did undergo a criminal records check and was found to be of good character.

Her fellow workers generally talk of George as a popular member of staff and – as one of the older workers – she quickly came to be seen as a figure of authority.

George's behaviour began to change from December 2008. The married mother-of-two was described from then on as "always seeming to be on the internet and chasing men".

Staff heard that George had offered a man sex for doing her car MOT and that she had sex on the moors for money. She also began to show images of adult pornography that were on her phone to other members of staff. Staff were embarrassed and worried – but did not take action.

Guardian (UK) 4th Nov. 2010

This woman was procurer of child pornography for others, for money, just as the local drug dealer sells dope. Blanchard was the middle man, not the Mr. Big, whose job it was to supply George with money, and receive the pornographic material.


The images and video procured by George, and handled by Blanchard wasn't for their own exclusive use. Who is the next person in the food chain, moving the pornography to those who want it?

It is suspected that Mrs George may have sent the images on a disk to Mr Blanchard, who emailed them to others.

Chf Supt Jim Webster, of Devon and Cornwall police, said: "We are taking the matter very seriously.

"It is difficult to identify exactly who is in the images at this stage.

"The starting point of the investigation was internet based. In an investigation of this nature there is often a chain of communication and passing on of images.

"We received information yesterday about the receipt of indecent images and searches are still on going. There is naturally great concern in the community. We will make sure parents and the wider community are kept informed."

Daily Telegraph, 10th June 2009

Really? So Blanchard paid for child pornography so he could just send the images to people in his address book  randomly? 

Blanchard is the key, he new the rats in the sewer and the rats in the positions of power: 

 Afterwards officers from the three forces involved in the investigation said Blanchard had been the “pivot” who linked George and Allen. He initiated the discussion of child abuse in conversations on Facebook and Microsoft Messenger by claiming to have been a victim himself. Police suspect that the three first made contact on one of the site’s many user groups before continuing their conversations via e-mail and text.

(Daily Mail) 3rd Oct 2009

The Powers That Be like regular sex with children, believe it or not, it's true. There are thousands of adults who were raped and abused by the powerful. They obtain their prey with middlemen and now women. These Powers have a great deal of money, and most common folk  are bought with trinkets and pennies. Just like Kincora, just like the Vatican,  just like Islington, just like the IRA, just like Hollie Greig. 

Yemen: the next target of the CIA, and the next International Aid from the UK.

Britain is part of a worldwide conspiracy, the purpose of which is to install a New World Order, consisting of a World Government, from the rubble of the United Nations, operated by the Communist-Zionist-Talmudic global corporate elite bloodline families.

The US wants an Empire, just like the British Empire. It wants to control the world, to crush opposition to the envisaged New World Order. In practicable terms, controlling the "gateways" of the world, like, say, Gibraltar and Cyprus (as the UK does) controls the Mediterranean Sea, and the northern end of the Suez Canal, get it?

Yemen, when it was controlled by Britain, was known as "Aden".With Yemen in the grip of the US military and CIA/MOSSAD/MI6, all traffic between the Indian Ocean and the Mediterranean Sea, via the Suez Canal, is completely controlled.

And they are to be brought under the control of the Anglo US axis by all means necessary. 

In addition to adding new urgency and a fresh dose of hysteria to the flagging war on manufactured terror, the toner bomb plot has provided an excuse to rationalize the global reach of the CIA.

(...)

 “Allowing the U.S. military’s Special Operations Command units to operate under the CIA would give the U.S. greater leeway to strike at militants even without the explicit blessing of the Yemeni government,” or the American people who, as usual, remain woefully uninformed.

(...)

Exploiting the obviously contrived Yemen toner bomb plot (see Paul Watson’s article today) as an excuse to shift more operational control to an unaccountable CIA would reduce conflict between the CIA’s National Clandestine Service and the more clandestine parts of USSOCOM. It would also consolidate operations.

(...)

 We are told the Obama administration is behind the effort to put the CIA’s “elite U.S. hunter-killer teams that operate secretly” inside Yemen, but the effort transcends any perceived rule by the teleprompter reader in chief.

Infowars 1st Nov. 2010

 And:

According to the London Guardian, Awlaki is now the “prime suspect” in the cargo plane bomb plot. He is also fingered as the mastermind by BBC News, and the London Telegraph amongst others. The man who allegedly made the ink toner cartridges that were later claimed to be deadly explosive devices was Saudi Arabian-born Ibrahim Hassan Al Asiri. Al Asiri is “in regular contact in Yemen with radical cleric Anwar Awlaki,” reports the Daily Mail.

As we reported last month, every indication points to American-born cleric Awlaki being a double agent working for US intelligence. He has been involved in almost every terror plot over the last couple of years, from directing the underwear bomber, who was allowed to board the plane by order of the US State Department aided by a well-dressed man who got Abdulmutallab on the airliner despite the fact that he was on a terror watchlist and had no passport, to advising Fort Hood shooter Major Nidal Malik Hasan. Authorities have engaged in a cover-up of what happened at Fort Hood after they ordered Private Lance Aviles to delete cell phone footage of the attack.

Infowars 1st Nov 2010 

And of course, once Yemeni society has been ruined by the covert CIA/MOSSA/MI6 terror campaign, the probable civil war sparked by both covert and direct warfare, we will need to "democratise" and "rebuild" Yemen.

A gathering in Riyadh next February was possibly "the last chance" to turn things around in Yemen, Mr Duncan said.

He warned that the country was at risk of sliding into "chaos", allowing al Qaida to flourish and present a security threat to the rest of the world.

In a speech to Chatham House in London, Mr Duncan said the cargo plane bomb plot demonstrated the need to tackle Yemen's problems on an international level.

"The lesson from other countries is that if we sit around and analyse a country on the edge of collapse for too long, by the time we decide to do anything about it, it's already too late," he said.

"That may be just where we are heading with Yemen."

Mr Duncan said Yemen was "high" on the coalition Government's agenda and of particular interest to the National Security Council.

"Yemen in collapse could lead to a litany of chaos - no water, no energy, no food, civil strife, al Qaida flourishing, increasing radicalisation, and a regional and international threat both to world energy supplies and to many nations' security," he said.

But he called for the international community to help tackle problems like poverty, disease and lack of education rather than wielding "a big stick".

"There are two ways Yemen's problems could be approached," he said.

"We can either address the underlying causes of poverty, grievance, joblessness and governance, or the international community could begin to start shouting and wave a big stick.

"For us in the coalition Government and (the Department for International Development), we are going to put development at the heart of an integrated approach for Yemen."

A ministerial meeting of the Friends of Yemen in the capital of neighbouring Saudi Arabia had the potential to be "a major turning point" for the country, he said.

"We don't have long. The next Friends of Yemen meeting in Riyadh is in February, only a few months away," he said.

"More than any other meeting before it, the Friends of Yemen meeting in Riyadh is possibly both a golden opportunity and the last chance there will be to address Yemen's problems before it is too late."

Mr Duncan added: "The next two months in the run-up to Riyadh are crucial, and the rhetoric we've all been hearing must now become reality."

 Independent (UK), Nov. 1st, 2010

There you go then. CIA creates the problem, the Yemenis react, he UN/NATO/Zio-Communists offer a solution. Another part of the jigsaw, placed into the great picture.

If I thought that this is just a good hard kicking for the Moslems, keep them in line etc, I wouldn't give a toss, as Islam is a viscous cruel and savage pagan religion, that, had it never existed, the world would not be any the less interesting. 

But this merely about control, on a scale unknown by man before. This is about changing the world, in the favour of the global ruling elites, who want to be the iron shod boot smashing us collectively in the face forever.  Islam stands in the way of this, as did Christianity at one time, and what the powerful cannot adapt to their purpose - like Christianity - they will destroy, as they are Islam presently.

Yes, the Tories will cut whatever services are to be left after the recent cuts, and shovel money into yet another black hole, in the Middle East, all on the orders of the City of London (Finance), Washington DC (Military) and the Vatican (Spiritual), all in the name of creating a New World Order.

Is that an Eye, all seeing, above the letter "I" ?

The story of Lord Northcliffe. The power of organized Jewery.

Sometimes truths are collated and served by less than salubrious people. This is one such case. However the saying "Where there's muck, there's Brass" is true. Hold your nose and read Mr. Strom's essay, which apparently is true.

Lord Northcliffe  was a victim of the Zionist establishment whose story deserves to be told, though it was covered up for decades. The lessons for us in his story are deep and profound.
 
by Kevin Alfred Strom (LINK to essay)

THE PRESS MAGNATE Alfred Harmsworth, later Britain’s Lord Northcliffe, once said: “News is what someone, somewhere is trying to suppress; the rest is just advertising.” Despite the fact that he was one of the most powerful men in what was then the British Empire, Northcliffe would eventually pay for that attitude with his life.

Northcliffe’s fall — from being one of the most powerful men in the world to being imprisoned as insane after which he quickly died — took only a few days. The trigger was his challenge to the Jewish power structure.

Northcliffe, who lived from 1865 to 1922, stood up to the political establishment of his time, damning Lord Kitchener during World War I when he was considered a war hero — and thereby engendering the hatred of millions and driving the circulation of his flagship paper down by some 80 per cent. He emerged victorious, just as he had in earlier decades when his business acumen and editorial skill had made him the outright owner of the two of the most widely read newspapers in Britain (and many other periodicals) and the majority proprietor of the then-leading newspaper in the world, The Times of London. Lord Northcliffe was possibly the earliest example of the modern press baron.

Northcliffe was a man who was a bit of a jingoistic nationalist — he took regrettable anti-German and anti-Boer positions, for example — and it is said that he would do almost anything to increase the circulation of the newspapers that he owned. Douglas Reed, in his interesting book The Controversy of Zion, writes “He was sometimes right and sometimes wrong in the causes he launched or espoused, but he was independent and unpurchasable. He somewhat resembled Mr. Randolph Hearst and Colonel Robert McCormick in America, which is to say that he would do many things to increase the circulation of his newspapers, but only within the limits of national interest; he would not peddle blasphemy, obscenity, libel or sedition. He could not be cowed and was a force in the land.”

Northcliffe, the son of an English barrister, was born Alfred Harmsworth near Dublin on the 15th of July 1865. With his brother Harold (later Lord Rothermere) he started the magazine Answers to Correspondents in 1888, which rapidly became a success with its question-and-answer format, selling over a million copies a week. He then founded a children’s newspaper, Comic Cuts, a woman’s magazine, Forget-Me-Nots, purchased the bankrupt Evening News and made it a success by modernizing it, and founded the revolutionary Daily Mail, which pioneered low-cost production, lavish use of illustrations, the smaller tabloid paper size, terse, fact-filled writing, sports and women’s sections, serial novels, and banner headlines. By the time of the Boer war, the paper sold a million copies a day. Harmsworth took what he considered a patriotic position, stating that the Mail stood for “the power, the supremacy and the greatness of the British Empire.”

The part-Jewish publisher Joseph Pulitzer was so impressed with Harmsworth’s talents that he hired him to edit the first edition of his brand new New York World on the first day of the twentieth century, which he did — using the tabloid (meaning compressed) size which he had pioneered and named, and which later become the dominant format for British newspapers.

One failure of Northcliffe was his launching of the first daily newspaper for women, the Daily Mirror, which did eventually become a success when he made it into a picture newspaper for both sexes. He took his losses and accepted his defeat with philosophy and humor, saying “Disaster may often be changed to triumph by alteration in tactics. The faculty of knowing when you are beaten is much more valuable than the faculty of thinking you are not beaten when you are. I had for many years a theory that a daily newspaper for women was in urgent request, and I started one. The belief cost me £100,000. I found out that I was beaten. Women don’t want a daily paper of their own. It was another instance of the failures made by a mere man in diagnosing women’s needs. Some people say that a woman never really knows what she wants. It is certain she knew what she didn’t want. She didn’t want the Daily Mirror.”

It was in 1905, the same year that he purchased The Times and the Sunday Observer, that his achievements were recognized by his being made Lord Northcliffe — at 40 the youngest-ever peer of the realm. [ http://tinyurl.com/2wfla ]

The First World War was a tragedy of bloodletting, destruction, and death for millions of the best young men of our European race on every side of the conflict — a tragedy from which we have still not yet recovered. Its origins are lost in obscure and shifting alliances, commercial jealousy, and the cynical ‘balance of power’ policy favored by the British Empire at the expense of pan-European interests. Its end was a farrago of madness in which avarice, revenge, crackpot ‘liberal’ nuttiness, and Zionism dominated. It is this last item — Zionism — with which we are — and Lord Northcliffe was — concerned.

According to a defector from the Jewish power structure of the time, Benjamin Freedman, Britain was on the verge of losing that war in 1917, when the Zionist Jews made a proposal to the British government. Britain could yet win this war, the Zionists argued, if America could be brought into the conflict on Britain’s side. With their already-substantial control of the American press, and with their tight circle of ‘advisors’ around President Wilson (who was beholden to them because of indiscreet letters in their possession which he had written to a woman not his wife), the Zionists made a good case that they could deliver what they promised. But there was a price to be paid. The British Empire was at that time administering the small Middle Eastern territory of Palestine, populated mainly by Palestinian Arabs and Christians and with only a small minority of Jews. The Zionist Jews coveted that territory — which later became Israel when their land-grab came to fruition — and their price for bringing American soldiers to die in Flanders fields was a declaration from Britain that the Empire favored the establishment of a Jewish state there. The price was paid. Lord Milner and Foreign Minister Balfour drafted the Balfour Declaration — and the puppeteers pulled the strings on crackpot Wilson and America went to war to “make the world safe for democracy’ and to “end war,” proving that many Americans had had their brains turned to mush long before the advent of television.

The scholar Revilo Oliver has stated that Milner’s interest in supporting the Zionists, apart from the immediate objective of winning the war, was in removing as many Jews as possible from Britain, and giving them their own country thousands of miles away seemed as good a way of doing that as any. Similar motives animated Balfour, as I stated on this program last year:

“…Balfour’s naiveté [is] in this case, a stand-in and symbol of White naiveté in general. The Jews wanted a policy statement from the then-dominant world power, the British Empire, and they got it and used it to the hilt, not hesitating to kill Britons when it suited them, as in the Zionist bombing of the King David Hotel, and while other Jews were, especially after World War II, doing everything in their power to undermine the status of the White nations including Britain. The Zionist entity has outlasted the British Empire which gave it birth, though Little Britain is still of some assistance in some projects, like the murder of Iraqis, currently being undertaken by the self-styled masters of the world. What’s really interesting about Balfour, who gave the Jews their foothold in Palestine, was that he didn’t particularly like Jews — and that he was a racialist. Like Adolf Hitler later, Balfour was enamoured of the idea of the Jews leaving Europe to found their own state elsewhere. Both men negotiated with Zionist Jews to effect that end. Hitler offered them Madagascar in 1938. In 1903, while he was Prime Minister, Balfour offered them Uganda. In debates on the Alien Act of 1905, Balfour sought to cut off Jewish immigration into Britain. Balfour openly admitted in 1914 (to leading Zionist Chaim Weizmann, no less) that he shared the extreme anti-Jewish sentiments of Cosima Wagner. Balfour [even] spoke against Jewish immigration in the House of Commons.”

After the war, Lord Northcliffe became alarmed by Zionist ambitions and Jewish power. In 1920, he publicized the book that has been banned and furiously denounced by the Jews perhaps more than any other, the famous Protocols of Zion, which purports to be notes taken at a meeting of Jews sometime during the nineteenth century, detailing a plan for world domination through intrigues, deception, and terror. I have already published my criticism of the Protocols elsewhere, but suffice it to say here that, although the book is unlikely to be what it claims to be — an actual record of an actual meeting — and though it clearly was created by a polemicist with a religious bias (witness its barbs directed at Darwin and Nietzsche, for example), its insights into the Jewish mentality and Jewish techniques are insightful and its tracing (before 1905!) of many of the paths that would be taken by the Jewish establishment in the last century are amazing.

Northcliffe probably saw the Protocols much as I see them, and decided they deserved to be seen and investigated by the British people. Accordingly he saw to it that significant parts of them were published in the most prestigious newspaper in the country, The Times, of which he was the principal owner, under the title ‘The Jewish Peril, a Disturbing Pamphlet, Call for Enquiry.’ He did not declare the Protocols to be true, but rather called for a full investigation to discover whether or not they were true. He stated that “an impartial investigation of these would-be documents and of their history is most desirable … are we to dismiss the whole matter without inquiry and to let the influence of such a book as this work unchecked?”

In 1922, Northcliffe asked the editor of The Times, Wickham Steed, to travel to Palestine to investigate the real nature of the Zionist project there, feeling sure that Steed, once he saw how a tiny and foreign Jewish minority was determined to use every foul means to dispossess the Palestinians, would make a 180 degree turn and stop supporting Chaim Weizmann and the other Zionists as he had theretofore. In this Northcliffe miscalculated badly, for the Zionist hold on Steed (the exact nature of which deserves further investigation) was so strong that Steed openly refused to act upon any of the requests of the man who was the majority owner of the paper and who was therefore his employer! Steed would not go to Palestine; Steed would not publish an article critical of Balfour’s attitude toward Zionism when asked to do so; and, when Northcliffe himself went to Palestine, Steed would not even publish Northcliffe’s own dispatches from that troubled land. Who was protecting Steed? Who and what was motivating Steed? These questions became even more important later that year. Douglas Reed wrote:

Then in 1922 Lord Northcliffe visited Palestine, accompanied by a journalist, Mr. J.M.N. Jeffries (whose subsequent book, Palestine: The Reality, remains the classic work of reference for that period). This was a combination of a different sort from that formed by the editors of The Times and Manchester Guardian, who wrote their leading articles about Palestine in England and in consultation with the Zionist chieftain, Dr. Weizmann. Lord Northcliffe, on the spot, reached the same conclusion as all other impartial investigators, and wrote, “In my opinion we, without sufficient thought, guaranteed Palestine as a home for the Jews despite the fact that 700,000 Arab Moslems live there and own it … The Jews seemed to be under the impression that all England was devoted to the one cause of Zionism, enthusiastic for it in fact; and I told them that this was not so and to be careful that they do not tire out our people by secret importation of arms to fight 700,000 Arabs … There will be trouble in Palestine . . . people dare not tell the Jews the truth here. They have had some from me.”

The articles by Jeffries and Northcliffe didn’t get published in The Times, but they did see the light of day in Northcliffe’s other papers, greatly alarming the Zionists, who needed the acquiescence of the British people for their land-grab to succeed.

Things started happening very fast for Lord Northcliffe soon thereafter. On February 26th, 1922, he returned from Palestine. On March 2d, he strongly criticized Steed at an editorial conference, expecting to precipitate his resignation. To Northcliffe’s amazement, Steed did not resign but decided to consult an attorney “to secure a lawyer’s opinion on the degree of provocation necessary to constitute unlawful dismissal.” Then, Steed says, he consulted Northcliffe’s own legal advisor who supposedly stated that Lord Northcliffe was “abnormal”, “incapable of business” and, judging from his appearance, “unlikely to live long” and who therefore advised the editor “to continue in his post.” On March 31st, Steed went to see Northcliffe in France and upon returning started spreading the story — even telling a director of the paper — that Northcliffe was “going mad.”

Douglas Reed himself worked with Northcliffe a few weeks later and reports he saw nothing at all indicating illness, madness, or abnormality of any kind. Reed also states that a very sane and sober Northcliffe informed him that someone was trying to kill him. Reed tells us:

The suggestion of madness thus was put out by an editor whom Lord Northcliffe desired to remove and the impressions of others therefore are obviously relevant. On May 3, 1922 Lord Northcliffe attended a farewell luncheon in London for a retiring editor of one of his papers and “was in fine form.” On May 11, 1922 he made “an excellent and effective speech” to the Empire Press Union and “most people who had thought him ‘abnormal’ believed they were mistaken.” A few days later Lord Northcliffe telegraphed instructions to the Managing Director of The Times to arrange for the editor’s resignation. This Managing Director saw nothing “abnormal” in such an instruction and was not “in the least anxious about Northcliffe’s health.” Another director, who then saw him, “considered him to have quite as good a life risk as his own”: he “noticed nothing unusual in Northcliffe’s manner or appearance” (May 24, 1922).

On June 11th, Steed met Northcliffe again in France and Northcliffe bluntly told him that he, Northcliffe, would now assume editorship of The Times. The next day, Steed, Northcliffe, and the entire entourage were aboard a train bound for Evian-les-Bains. Unknown to Northcliffe, a doctor (whose name has not been revealed to this day) was secreted aboard the train by Steed, and somehow Northcliffe was manipulated into his custody. When the train arrived in Switzerland another unnamed physician (described years later only as “a brilliant French nerve specialist”) was summoned and declared Northcliffe “insane.” Immediately Steed telegraphed the ‘news’ to London and ordered The Times to disregard and not to publish any communications from its primary owner. On June 13th, Steed returned to London. On June 18th, Northcliffe was back in London, too, but in custody and totally removed from all control of or communication with his far-flung enterprises. Even his telephone lines were cut. Police were posted at the offices of The Times to prevent his entering should he reach them. He never did.

On that same day, with Northcliffe out of circulation and his powerful voice of protest silenced, the League of Nations voted to reconfirm the ‘British Mandate’ in Palestine, which had mutated into a ‘mandate’ to install the Zionists in power there by violence and fraud.

On August 14th, 1922 Lord Northcliffe died, supposedly the cause of death being “ulcerative endocarditis.” None of the story of his alleged insanity or confinement was known to the public at the time. It was concealed for thirty years, eventually coming out in the Official History of The Times and, in greater detail in Reed’s The Controversy of Zion.

When Northcliffe died, he left in his will three month’s salary to each of his 6,000 employees, a total of 533,000 pounds — a huge sum in today’s inflated currency. The story of Northcliffe’s challenge to the Zionists deserves more study, as does the continuation of that challenge by Northcliffe’s brother Harold, Lord Rothermere. Rothermere eventually came to the conclusion that Jewish power needed to be defeated for the good of Europe, and that Britain’s best interest lay in support of the other European nations which had begun the fight.

Lord Rothermere wrote in the Daily Mail for the 10th of July, 1933:

I urge all British young men and women to study closely the progress of the Nazi regime in Germany. They must not be misled by the misrepresentations of its opponents. The most spiteful detractors of the Nazis are to be found in precisely the same sections of the British public and press as are most vehement in their praises of the Soviet regime in Russia. They have started a clamorous campaign of denunciation against what they call “Nazi atrocities” which, as anyone who visits Germany quickly discovers for himself, consists merely of a few isolated acts of violence such as are inevitable among a nation half as big again as ours, but which have been generalized, multiplied and exaggerated to give the impression that Nazi rule is a bloodthirsty tyranny.

The German nation, moreover, was rapidly falling under the control of its alien elements. In the last days of the pre-Hitler regime there were twenty times as many Jewish Government officials in Germany as had existed before the war. Israelites of international attachments were insinuating themselves into key positions in the German administrative machine. Three German Ministers only had direct relations with the Press, but in each case the official responsible for conveying news and interpreting policy to the public was a Jew.

[ http://tinyurl.com/ypbsf ]

Rothermere died — some say of a broken heart — shortly after the second great Jew-instigated fratricidal European bloodbath began in 1939.

The life and death of Lord Northcliffe have left us many lessons. Chief among those lessons is this: The enemy with whom we deal has no honor and no concept whatsoever of a fair fight, whether in a shooting war or in the war of ideas. Dealing with them as we would deal with an opponent of our own race, observing the conventions of civility and fairness and an honorable contest — and expecting the same from them, will be fatal every time. What we can expect from them is a stab in the back; poisoning; paid betrayers; lies, lies, and more lies in every direction one turns, lies so thick that they multiply faster than one can respond to them; and destruction of a million innocent lives if it gets them one inch closer to their inhuman goals.

Zionists in their own words

Germany is bored with multiculti madness.

 BBC - Merkel: multiculturalism has utterly failed. 17th Oct. 2010

Attempts to build a multicultural society in Germany have "utterly failed", Chancellor Angela Merkel says.

She said the so-called "multikulti" concept - where people would "live side-by-side" happily - did not work, and immigrants needed to do more to integrate - including learning German.

The comments come amid rising anti-immigration feeling in Germany.

 

The End of Multiculturalism by Patrick J. Buchanan

Baby boomer Europe decided in the 1960s and 1970s it wanted La Dolce Vita, not the hassle of children. It had that sweet life. Now the bill comes due. And the bill is the end of their tribes and countries as we have known them.

Is Europe’s adventure in international living about to end?

At Potsdam, Germany, this weekend, Chancellor Angela Merkel told the young conservatives of her Christian Democratic Union that Germany’s attempt to create a multicultural society where people “live side by side and enjoy each other” has “failed, utterly failed.”

Backing up her rueful admission are surveys showing 30 percent of Germans believe the country is overrun by foreigners. An equal number believe the foreigners come to feed off German welfare.

Merkel had in mind the Turks who came as gastarbeiters, guest workers, in the 1960s. Some 2.5 million now live in Germany.

Arabs and East Europeans have come more recently. One survey puts the Muslim population at 5 million.

“Multikulti is dead,” says Horst Seehofer of Merkel’s sister party, the Christian Social Union of Bavaria. He wants no more immigration from “alien cultures.” Turks and other Muslims are not learning the language, he contends, not assimilating, not becoming Germans.

Awareness of deep differences with Turkish neighbors became acute for Germans when, grieving in solidarity with America after 9/11, they learned that Turkish sectors of Berlin were celebrating Islam’s victory with barrages of bottle rockets.

Common Purpose - Freemasonry for County Halls and Town Halls in Britain.

From the website: Stop Common Purpose.

The Hidden Agenda 

Update: 2010-05-15 The recent change of government is just an illusion. The same people are still pulling the strings. The hidden agenda continues. 

From 1997, the New Labour government worked to two agendas. Firstly, the open agenda as laid out in their manifestos and secondly, their hidden agenda. 

The objective of the hidden agenda is the creation of a Communitarian society controlled by the EU collective. 

In order to achieve this objective, the New Labour government ran a parallel administration made up of QUANGOs and fake charities. A fake charity is legally a charity but effectively operates as a government department, receiving a substantial amount of funding directly or indirectly from government and operating as a government department. 

The hidden agenda continues to operate under the coalition government.

The British parliament has become just a puppet organization. They merely go through the motions - the pretense of acting like a governing body, but the reality is they are just rubber stamping the programmes of the New World Order global communitarian technocrats. 

Common Purpose is a fraudulent 'educational charity' acting as a change agent and recruiter and is part of the management mechanism being used to carry out this hidden agenda. 

Whilst carrying out the hidden agenda, Common Purpose has corruptly abused millions of pounds of taxpayers' money. 

Common Purpose is guilty of defrauding YOU of YOUR money. 

Some people think that Common Purpose is simply a criminal organisation set up to siphon off public money but there is a lot more than that to the Common Purpose agenda. 

What is Common Purpose? 

On the surface, Common Purpose is an educational charity, registered in the UK under number 1023384, that does leadership and networking development training. 

However, Common Purpose is not what it appears to be on the surface.

In reality, Common Purpose is a corrupt, subversive, secretive and deeply sinister organisation with a hidden agenda (Communitarian social control, corporate and EU state control) and hidden backers (Tavistock Institute, Fabian Society, Brussels). 

Common Purpose is a change agent being used to recruit and train the commissars and apparatchiks needed to implement the hidden New World Order global communitarian technocratic agenda. 

The Obama Deception: Youtube censorship !

Alex Jones isn't perfect. He has flaws. Watch the film.