Thousamd will arrive, thousands upon thousands, and the Supreme Court members will get more Police protection.

Abdul and Rafiq can't believe how helpful the Police at Calais are, knowing their Civil Partnership registration in Britain won't be delayed by paperwork or questions any longer, thanks to the UK Supreme Court.

Straight from the horses arse: 

The Supreme Court has ruled that two gay men from Iran and Cameroon have the right to asylum in the UK.

The pair took their cases to the court after being told by the Home Office they could safely return home if they were "discreet" about their sexual orientation.

The Cameroonian man, HT, argued he was told he could be sent home despite being attacked after he was seen kissing his partner.

The Iranian man, HJ, was told by a tribunal that he must expect persecution for his homosexuality and could avoid it by being discreet.

Lord Hope, who read out the judgment, said: "To compel a homosexual person to pretend that his sexuality does not exist or suppress the behaviour by which to manifest itself is to deny him the fundamental right to be who he is."

An earlier Court of Appeal decision said the government could return the pair to their home countries on the basis that they could be discreet, despite homosexuality being illegal in both countries and HT suffering violence from his neighbours.

The case was brought on behalf of the men by the London office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.

The men's lawyer, Iona Harding, of Baker & McKenzie, said: "This is an excellent result which will ensure that lesbian, gay and bisexual people receive the protection they are entitled to as refugees in the UK and are not expected to hide their identity in order to escape execution, long prison sentences or other forms of persecution."

Gay asylum campaigner Paul Canning told PinkNews.co.uk that the decision had "extremely broad implications" for gay asylum seekers in other countries due to the EU trying to bring standardise asylum policy.

He added: "This is a clear victory. It is one in the eye for the last government."

The court's judgment said that the term "concealment" was preferred to discretion, as this recognises that gay people in homophobic countries may need to be dishonest about their sexuality and that the average person would find it intolerable to have to conceal their sexuality for fear of persecution.

It added that UK authorities must consider whether asylum applicants have to conceal their sexuality at home for fear of persecution and if so, they should be given refugee status regardless of whether they can successfully keep their sexuality secret.

The coalition government has said it will introduce new rules to prevent the deportation of any gay asylum seeker who faces "imprisonment, torture or execution" if sent home.

Neither HT or HJ were at risk of torture or execution and neither said they had been imprisoned.

Home secretary Theresa May said: "I welcome the ruling of the Supreme Court, which vindicates the position of the coalition government.

"We have already promised to stop the removal of asylum seekers who have had to leave particular countries because their sexual orientation or gender identification puts them at proven risk of imprisonment, torture or execution.

"I do not believe it is acceptable to send people home and expect them to hide their sexuality to avoid persecution.

"From today, asylum decisions will be considered under the new rules and the judgment gives an immediate legal basis for us to reframe our guidance for assessing claims based on sexuality, taking into account relevant country guidance and the merits of each individual case.

"We will, of course, take any decisions on a case-by-case basis looking at the situation in the country of origin and the merits of individual cases in line with our commitment."

Every street in the land is to be filled to the brim with anyone who CLAIMS to be a queer, pooftah, shirtlifter, left footer, dyke, lezza or bumchum, because you an bet that this decision has gone double quick time along the jungle telegraph to each and every part of the world. 

This is no accident. This is no chance happening, not a rogue opinion. This spiteful, purposeful and meant to hammer at the indigenous Caucasian population of Britain. Unemployment stands at 2,500,000. Housing is in dire short supply. Public services are already to be cut by 20% or more. So who will lose out? 

Not the Moslem, the West African, the Gypsy. Not the Jew, not the Lesbian, not the child molester. 

These group above represent the protected "minority" who have and always have the first middle and last call on any public service or assistance because they scream DISCRIMINATION! HATER! BIGOT!

And now were officially importing more . Not content with ENDLESSLY INCREASING  the Islamist battle cry, the Call to Prayer, the Moldovan Child Porn and Prostitution racketeer, the Hindu Temple and the Negroid Drug Dealer, we now appear not to have enough homosexuals and lesbians, to drain away whatever public services are left to us when the International Military Industrial Complex has HAD IT'S LATEST BAIL OUT. 

Those who the gods wish to destroy, he first makes mad.

I'm stunned by the Budget

All the Reds are whining about the budget. The Tories have done some good then.

As I've said previously, VAT rise is bad and regressive.

No duty on booze and fags. Raaaaay!

£1000 rise in tax allowance. Raaaaay!

And the budget cuts - excluding the NHS - will get rid us of thousands of Black One Legged Lesbian Ex Prostitute counsellors, Carrot Co-ordinators, Punjabi AIDS specialists, Smoking Cessation staff, Chinese Opium Addict advisors  and all the other deadbeat hangers on of the largess of the last Communist government. Raaaaay!

Immigration is wanted by who, and for why, exactly?

Key Facts

Net immigration quadrupled to 237,000 a year between 1997 and 2007. 

In 2008 it was 163,000. 

3 million immigrants have arrived since 1997.

A migrant still arrives every minute.

We must build a new home every six minutes for new migrants.

England is already, with Holland, the most crowded country in Europe
(except Malta)

Immigration will add 7 million to the population of England in the next 24 years - that is 7 times the population  of Birmingham.

To keep the population of the UK below 70 million, immigration must be reduced by 70%. Government measures so far may reduce it by 12%.

Adapted from Migration Watch UK.

So immigration is really NOT in the interests of the average British white man or woman then, and never has been, it has only ever been a COST, in one way or another.

A further complication is the requirement that an application to join the GP’s list can only be refused if there are reasonable grounds for doing so which “do not relate to the applicant’s race, gender, social class, age, religion, sexual orientation, appearance, disability or medical condition”. The paper continues “As the regulations stand this means that a practice has the discretion to offer NHS treatment to all people – UK residents and overseas visitors from any country.

...

The only way a GP could determine whether a non-eligible patient had a routine or minor condition that did not require immediately necessary treatment would be by seeing and examining him. By this stage the work would have been done.

Migration Watch here.

In the interests of the people?

Immigration

4. The ODPM statistical release attributes 123,000 of the additional households per year to adult population growth, 43,000 to more single households and 39,000 to more pensioners.
5. The projections of adult population include the effect of immigration. They assumed a net inflow of 130,000 people per year (to the UK as a whole). They also calculated the housing need on an assumption of zero net migration (i.e. immigration and emigration in balance). Under this scenario the average annual increase in the number of households would be 144,000 instead of the primary projection of 209,000 a year. The difference is the effect of immigration - 65,000 additional households each year. That amounts to 1.5 million over the period 2003 - 2026, or nearly a third of the total new households

Migration Watch here. 

Your son or daughter finding it hard to obtain accommodation? You watching your rent rise?Being taxed more to pay the Housing costs through Housing benefits?

6. Of the 115,000 births to foreign-born mothers, the origins of the mother were as follows:

7. Of the births to mothers from the New Commonwealth, the countries/regions of the mothers' origins were as shown below: 

8. In parts of the United Kingdom births to foreign-born mothers now represent more than 50% of all live births. In Inner London as a whole the figure is 55% with Tower Hamlets, Newham and Westminster having the highest percentages at 68%.

9. Outer London also has a high percentage of births to foreign-born mothers at 41% with the highest figure being recorded in Brent at 65%.

10. The percentage for Greater London as a whole is 47%, i.e. nearly one birth in every two in the capital is to a foreign-born mother.

11. Outside London, Manchester, Bradford, Leicester, Birmingham, Cambridge, Forest Heath (Suffolk), Slough and Oxford recorded more than 30% of births to foreign-born mothers.

Migration Watch here.

So, why is the migration wanted? Who wants it? Why would it be in any British interest to flood the United Kingdom with millions of immigrants?

The International, Global Elite. They appear to be like you, they talk warmly of Britain. They don't give a tinkers cuss for you, your children or future. Their entire purpose is a passive, retarded and stupefied population who will do as they're told.



They have brought wave after wave of immigrant, irrespective of their value, worth or even civilised attitudes, to make money.

They have been brought to replace the indigenous people. They are the weapon of ETHNOCIDE, to remove the British from the future, and replace us with - who?

The key finding: there are fewer British-born workers in the first quarter of 2009 than Q1 of 1997. The trend of employers preferring immigrants, which we saw during the boom, has become more marked still during the bust.

I count myself as a supporter of immigration. But there is no doubt that mass immigration has given ministers the option of ignoring our own unemployed. If we didn’t have this unending tap of motivated workers then Britain would be forced to confront the fact that so many of its workers are being incentivised to do nothing by the welfare state. Here’s what the benefit tally, including ‘hidden unemployment’, has looked like in the last decade – using the DWP’s definition of out-of-work benefits. 

At no point in the boom did the number on out-of-work benefits fall  below five million souls. Almost half have been on welfare for five years or more – and are, therefore, statistically more likely to die than to work again. As I say, were it not for immigration, we’d be forced to confront this problem or our economy would not grow. When I was a business journalist in the late 1990s, I remember writing stories about how bus companies were recruiting in homeless shelters because they couldn’t find the staff. The people in those shelters were being offered structure to their lives, from an employer forced by economic conditions to deal with the greater risk they pose. It was a sign of economic growth addressing social problems – as it should be.

Spectator (UK) here.

Unless WE do something about it, WE are simply going to disappear.

Taxes rise today. A cut in International Aid? Not likely...

The UK International Aid and Development Department, trading under the QUANGO like name of UKAID, has wasted away an average of £6,500,000,000 each year for the last five years. That's approximately £32,500,000,000.

Some of it is even went to China and Russia in the past few weeks.

 

This year the budget is to be "ring fenced" i.e. whilst YOU watch taxes rise on the things YOU want, the UKAID budget has spiraled to £10,000,000,000. And it will keep growing: 

It is believed that Paris-based Unesco and the Food and Agriculture Organisation, based in Rome, are two organisations that will be closely scrutinised. 

Guardian,  9th June 2010

However:

The coalition government has pledged to increase spending on aid in order to meet the United Nations target of 0.7% of national output by 2013.

Guardian, 9th June 2010

This of course  is only a small part of the torrent of British money thrown into the vast black hole that the African continent is. Trillions of pounds have been alloted since 1945, and  what is  Africa like today?

Large swathes of Africa are in a semi-permanent tribal war. The vast majority of Africa is operated and owned by the most brutal and evil dictators, who make Stalin, Mao and Hitler look like Sunday School teachers.

Crime runs rampant and uncontrolled.

Police corruption is endemic.

Child Rape operates uncontrolled, and is widely accepted: here, and here and here.

So, remember, when you're being BLED DRY for taxes to BAIL OUT the CITY OF LONDON you can be assured this paragon of virtue and here and here. will be kept in the style to which YOU have made and encouraged him accustomed to:

ConDem to Announce Tax Rises of £10 Billion, but Foreign Aid “Ring Fenced” at £13 Billion

The ConDem government’s plans to announce £10 billion of tax rises in Tuesday’s emergency budget stands in shocking contrast to their pledge to increase foreign aid to £13 billion per year.

The planned £10 billion across-the-board tax increase, leaked by the Sunday Times, will include rises in VAT and capital gains tax in addition to the increase in National Insurance already announced by the previous Labour regime.

According to the report, tax on alcohol, tobacco duty and air travel will also increase in the budget to be presented by Chancellor George Osborne.

He will also apparently outline £40 billion of spending cuts which will include a freeze on the wages of civil servants (except MPs, no doubt) and will cut benefits payments to middle class families.

It is mind-boggling that Mr Osborne and his coalition gang have the nerve to demand of British people that they pay extra tax which could easily be made up by simply slashing the foreign aid budget.

Apart from the foreign aid budget, other places where billions could be shaved off the budget include the annual costs of £18 billion spent on “global warming,” the £13 billion spent on immigration, the £4 billion spent on asylum, the £15 billion spent on EU membership, the £5 billion per year spent fighting the illegal and immoral Afghanistan war and the billions spent on “politically correct” social engineering projects.

ConDem to Announce Tax Rises of £10 Billion, but Foreign Aid “Ring Fenced” at £13 Billion

The BNP is right on this one. Why are UK taxpayers being bled white when third world political psycopaths, titled President For Life and God of the World and sucjh other descriptors of liberty are being handed used £10 notes in bundles of a thousand?

VAT, the favourite tax of the wealthy Elite.

 Can the people in Britain be pushed to rebel?

There has been a great deal of chit chat about the potentiality of a rise in VAT, the Value Added Tax imposed on the British people because the EEC (the forerunner of the EU) demanded it. Here's a PDF all about introduction of the VAT, click here to download it.

Most people live in ignorance of this tax, because it is collected without you seeing it, by the seller of the goods.We are financially raped with every transaction made.

In principle, VAT applies to all provisions of goods and services. VAT is assessed and collected on the value of goods or services that have been provided every time there is a transaction (sale/purchase). The seller charges VAT to the buyer, and the seller pays this VAT to the government. If, however, the purchaser is not an end user, but the goods or services purchased are costs to its business, the tax it has paid for such purchases can be deducted from the tax it charges to its customers. The government only receives the difference; in other words, it is paid tax on the gross margin of each transaction, by each participant in the sales chain.

Wikipedia.

Very nice blurb, but not the truth. The VAT exists to hide the full tax take, to obscure how much is bled from the economy each and very day. Billions are collected and simply pissed away on rubbish, such as immigrants, worthless educational qualifications, war in the Gulf, PC garbage etc et al. Remove this trash, and we can CUT TAXES, whilst spending what does come in more wisely and with greater singular purpose.

VAT impoverishes the poor, as it is levied on virtually EVERYTHING people do: 

UK Fact-File Part 2: Individual Business Domestic Taxation 2.10 UK Value Added Tax (VAT) VAT is charged on most goods and services. VAT can only be charged or reclaimed by a VAT-registered business or individual. VAT is charged on certain goods or services sold (output tax) and can be claimed back on VAT paid on goods or services purchased (input tax). The standard rate of VAT reverted to 17.5% from 15% on 1st January, 2010; a reduced rate of 5% applies inter alia to domestic fuel or power, heating equipment, children’s car seats, some contraceptives and sanitary products, and certain residential property renovations. Included in the list of supplies that are zero-rated are gold and UK bank notes, books, children’s clothing, charities, food, drugs & medicines, transport and sewage, water services, goods supplies to other VAT-registered entities within the EU, and certain transactions related to the construction of residential property. Personal Business Tax Guide The POOR and AVERAGE peoples spend a higher percentage then the WEALTHY of their incomes on the many items covered by VAT. ONLY those who are wealthy are the beneficiaries of this systematic grinding of the masses, and if we fail to act we will end up with the Communists wielding the whip - worse by far if you study the USSR. It is an absolutely wicked tax, with no redeeming quality. IF the Tory/LibDem coalition were SERIOUS about a reform to taxation they would introduce a FLAT TAX, with a minimum standard of existence level wherein you would recieve WELFARE PAYMENTS to make up your income to at least subsistence level. No more odd little allowances, just a basic rate of tax for everyone, simple, easy, a percentage. An example:  Earned £50,000 in total, with shares, savings, etc ? Basic allowance £25000? Tax payable? 10% of £25000 = £2500. Simple, huh? No other taxes. No electricity tax, no petrol tax, no clothing taxes, tampon taxes or anything else. Alongside of this however: The national debt? A fixed term levy on stuff that is a choice, until it is paid down: A 10% tax on fast food, gold and silver, carbonated drinks, high performance cars, fur based clothing, DVD/CDs, alcohol and tobacco products, video games, internet access, and the rubbish the rich fritter their cash away on (which is their choice) , including a tax on home sales where the house is worth 5 times the average for a three bedroom house in the district,  collected and paid directly to our lenders (through the buy back of government bonds - GILTS) to amortize - KILL - the debt. And then it stops. Finally we need to accept that the Welfare system is broken beyond repair, and do something different, probably leaving people to choose what they do outside the national minimum subsistence level.

Here come the tax rises - the poor to bail out the rich.

So it starts. The chit chat is over, now we are to bail out the banks. This isn't going to stop, it will go on (at least seemingly) forever. 

VAT is to rise to twenty percent. 

Value Added Tax is the creation of the EU.

It's why we didn't have VAT in Britain until we joined the European Economic Community.

 VAT is a punishment on the poor for their poverty, taking no account of their ability to pay, or wealth, just the price of the goods. 

It is redistributive, in the sense that the wealthy spend proportionately LESS on the purchase of GOODS and SERVICES than the POOR.

UK drinkers face double whammy price hike in budget.

Telegraph (UK) 12th June 2010

The Treasury is considering repeating the 5 per cent increase in alcohol duty imposed in the March Budget as part of a tax-raising package to be unveiled by George Osborne, the Chancellor, next week.

The emergency budget is also likely to see VAT increased from its current level of 17.5 per cent as ministers battle with Britain's huge £156 billion deficit. A VAT hike – possibly up to 20 per cent – would also hit drinkers in the pocket.

Last night industry leaders claimed drinkers had been "punished enough". The duty paid on beer and wine has risen 26 per cent since the start of 2008, while for spirits it has risen by 22 per cent.

However, the overall tax "take" from alcohol fell £730 million, from £15.117 in 2008 to £14.386 billion, in 2009, according to duty bulletins from HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) and provisional figures for total alcohol expenditure from the Office for National Statistics (ONS).

Another five per cent duty rise in the budget combined with an increase of 2.5 percentage point rise in the rate of VAT rate would put 19p on a bottle of Hardys VR Chardonnay, taking the wine's price to £4.74, while a bottle of Gordon's gin would rise 65p from £13.15 to £13.80.

The warnings of price rises came as Treasury sources told The Sunday Telegraph that ministers could come under ever greater pressure to put up taxes and identify swingeing spending cuts after new forecasts are published this week.

Tomorrow, the new independent Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) will publish revised growth forecasts which most experts believe will be sharply lower than the Treasury's current prediction of a 3.25 per cent for 2011 and 2.75 per cent for 2012.

Here, however is a pointer to the future: 

Newly elected Tory MP Sarah Wolleaston, a Devon GP, has said ministers should examine the evidence from other countries that setting minimum prices "disproportionately reduces the intake of high-risk groups".

She added: "There is no doubt it would be initially unpopular – people would say it's the nanny state and it's not what government should be about.

"But if the Government took the brave step of introducing a minimum price, in five years' time people would see there had been a major difference."

The British Medical Association has suggested a rate of 50p per unit of alcohol, which could mean a pint of medium-strength beer costing £1.14 (MORE ed.) and a bottle of wine £4.50.

The good times have gone. 

We are to be slowly impoverished. 

THIS is the moment that we can be pillaged for whatever asset we can hoard away, forced as we shall be to spend everything we have on day-to-day living. 

This period in which we live - now - is the moment that the wet dreams of the Thatcherites, "Free Marketeers", Victorian dreamers & fantasists come to pass. 

And sadly,  it's also the very time in which the poor sods who believed that "socialism", the Labour Party version of it,  will slowly realise it is is dead as an ideology. 

If you're doing well, then OK you'll most likely be  fine. However - the abyss awaits for those who fail. 

Go and buy some home brewing kit if you like your beer. If you like it in the pub, or cheap from Tescburys or Sainsbros, it's being priced out of your hands as we speak.  Wilkinsons offer a nice range, at a reasonable price. 

I haven't found a conspiracy theory I didn't think about.

There are conspiracies everywhere.



Some are ludicrous:

• Hitler was removed from the bunker in Berlin in a Yellow Submarine by, amongst others, Ian Fleming. 
• 99.9% of UFO stories
• Immigration is good for Britain
• The Queen is a literal reptillian creature

Real ones include:

• Vaccines are really not very good for you.
• David Icke speaks SOME truth but for financial reasons dresses much of it New Age mumbo jumbo like "Reptilian Creatures" because he is frightened identify those who are really at the core of the conspiracies, and because Yanks loved the 2012 end of the world trash
• There is a group called Common Purpose, who are busily infiltrating the British government right at this movement. 
• Many powerful positions, held both in government, media and the economy of Great Britain, the US, Australia, NZ and Canada, are held by Jews, out of proportion by their numbers within the population, who control the City of London.
•  Fluoride in Toothpaste is highly poisinous, a by-product of the aluminium industry, and was used by both Hitler (Concentration Camps) and Stalin (Gulags), and does nothing to halt tooth decay.
• George Bernard Shaw, H G Wells, Annie Besant, Eleanor Marx, and others created the Fabian Society, a revolutionary group, whose purpose is to carry out a scientific revolution, described in the novel, and film, "Things to Come" (written by HG Wells), part of which is an enormous Eugenics campaign, of us common folk here in Britain.
• We have been financially raped over the past sixty years under the guise of modernism and socialism. 
• There are many, many Jesuits, Knights of Malta, Opus Dei and other Roman Catholic fraternity members deeply embedded in the British parliament, whose purpose is to return Britain to the control of the Vatican. 

Most of us have been duped. The vast majority of Roman Catholics and Jews are as dumb a group of sheep as 99.9% of Freemasons, Pagans/Wiccans, Socialists, Libertarians. Reading The Guardian is a good indicator of stupidity, but not foolproof. The Jesuits, Zionists are really wolves in sheep's clothing, just as the chap in the first video above says. There is no "one group" who is to "blame" , they are merely exoteric facets of the esoteric - unseen - invisible hand controlling events.

To reiterate:

The reality is that Jesuits, and Zionists, Freemasons, all believe in the same thing: they are Luciferians : they are Humanists. They gained control of Europe in the Enlightenment, and it is why we are where we are today. They are not Jews, Or Roman Catholics, or Protestants, even if the claim to be so: those ideologies are in their eyes, for the profane, the temporal, the stupid sheep (they are not interested as to whether there is any truth in them either, they have their own truths). 

Now, we know that all of the major political parties, plus the Green Party, are all the same, just dressed differently, like shop dummies in the department store window.
We know that the system is rigged to keep the scum who sell their soul for thirty pieces of silver - professional "Politicians" are worthless. They are puppets.




Democracy in the modern, bourgeois sense, is worthless. The moment those from outside the political grid come close to power, the mechanisms they planned to use, once in their elected places, are destroyed and new ones substituted.
The most that we can hope to achieve from the electoral system is to awaken people, to recruit people into some form of alternative structure, eventually bypassing Parliament, and allowing it to decay.
Successful revolutions require less than 15% of the people to take a stand. It's deciding what that stand is, that's the problem.

Time to make a start.