Showing posts with label Liberals. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Liberals. Show all posts

Thursday, July 14, 2011

Crime not linked to recession. Bollocks.


Democracy is the great love of the failures and cowards of life. 
[R.J. Rushdoony, Thy Kingdom Come, 1978]
* * *

Brokenshire: 'There is no link between crime and the economy'

Minister for Crime and Security James Brokenshire says Britain's economic woes have not caused an increase in crime, despite a sharp rise in the number of UK burglaries, according to the British Crime Survey (BCS).



The survey of 45,000 households indicated that burglaries in England and Wales increased by 14 per cent in 2010-11 compared with the previous year.
The figures also showed a 6 per cent increase in violent crime with a sharp rises in domestic violence and assaults with minor injuries.
Minister for Crime and Security James Brokenshire denied there was a a rise "in recession-led crime" and argued the figures were not statistically significant.



Daily Telegraph, 14th July 2011
Only a politician can speak of a 14% rise in burglary, or a 6% rise in violent crime is "statistically insignificant".

The political class of Great Britain, like those of all Western nations,  have become completely dislocated from the real world. The exist in a bubble, of wealth, power and security.

Their incomes, their work, their life experiences are unlike 90% of the population.


Their children are never abused and sold as child prostitutes by Moslem child molesters.
Their wives are not gang raped by Somalian "asylum seekers" or refugees.
They are not murdered in their front garden by a gang of savages.
Their possessions are not stolen by junkie scum.  
They do not have to struggle with burglars inside their home. 
They do not watch their garden and home wrecked by vandals. 

Their income is guaranteed for their term of election, and most are reelected time after time - look at Tony Benn, Dennis Skinner, Ted Heath as examples: the vast majority sit for seats which rarely change allegiance, so thy are safe. Only a tiny minority of seats are swing seats, and an MP will move like lightening to a safe seat at the first opportunity. When they do retire they are kept in the lap of luxury with a gold plated, copper bottom, feather-bedded, taxpayer funded pension for life.



Crime isn't really bad. Unemployment is falling. We're doing something about immigration.  All these kinds of statements are the same sort of reassuring words you use to a child when thy ask difficult questions, but you can't ignore them.

They nod sagely and agree there are too many immigrants entering Britain, unemployment is terrible, housing is in short supply - whilst opening us to Syrian, Romanian,  Nigerian, Bulgarian, Liberian, Albanian, Egyptian, Ghanaian, Turkish, Botswanan, Iraqi, Iranian, Libyan, Afghani, Chinese, Kurdish, and South American immigration.

"We'll be tough on crime" they'll promise, whilst Ken Clarke MP, the whatever job title he is in the government  plans and plots to close prison places and flood the streets with criminals.



THEY NEVER SUFFER THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR ACTIONS. THEY ARE OF A SELECT CLASS, THE SERVANTS OF THE ELITE POWERS OF THE PLANET, THE ROTHSCHILD CLAN IN THE CITY OF LONDON, THE JESUITS IN THE VATICAN, AND THE JEWS IN WASHINGTON DC.

But their reassurances - they're not working any longer.

And as the political class becomes more distant from the people, only one of two things can be the conclusion: tyranny or revolution.  Presently the tyranny is building. Elections no longer matter, as the three parties in the UK which are in reality the governing class - Lib, Lab, Con - have philosophically merged, and now the discussion centres around the differing means to the predetermined end, rather than what the end is (death of ideological difference).

There is an implicit admission that things are unravelling. We already see that the multiculturalism and equalitarian dreams of the sixties have failed to come to fruition by voluntary choice, creating a colour blind, gender neutral socialist and co-operative commonwealth in Britain.




We have to have repressive laws because the people have failed to accept the wisdom offered by our ruling elite: including long prison sentences for those who will not comply by either by accepting the paradigm of a coffee coloured world or just keeping their mouths shut.

We are now fined for a thousand and one things which would, thirty years ago have been totally unacceptable by the mass of people. New regulations and laws are created by the ream each and every month, thousands of them, that we virtually "break the law" just by leaving the house. These of course, under real, Anglo Saxon Common Law, are nothing, unreal, and worthless. There is now power to just fine people without a trial (Magna Carta), but the government owns all the guns, all the police, all the courts and all the prisons, so are able to simply tax people to the nhilt (which is what these spurious fines really are - indirect  taxes).



Of course, while the police and other bodies are fining you for leaving your car parked more than 12" from the kerb, or leaving a trash bag by your wheelie bin on bin day, or some other non crime, REAL CRIMINALS, who REALLY break the REAL law, keep up their wickedness: drug dealers deal, rapists rape, murderers play X Box games in hotel style "prisons", Child Molesters are "understood" by health care professionals, and fraudsters are given community service hours. 

 * * * * 

St. Paul, in reminding the Corinthian Christians of their destiny, said, Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world? (I Cor. 6:2). Moffatt renders this, Do you not know that the saints are to manage the world?, a meaning we do not need to remind ourselves of. Church government is a prelude to world government, not by the church but by the saints. In trying to establish the necessary church government towards this end, Paul's constant appeal was, not to the form of church government or to the members, but to the law of God and the growth of the saints in terms of it (I Cor. 6:15-9:27). ....Judging, governing, or managing of the world is in terms of God's law. Because the saints were called to manage or govern the world, very quickly it became their purpose to move into positions of authority and power. 
[R.J. Rushdoony, The Institutes of Biblical Law (Nutley, NJ: Craig Press, 1973), pp. 773,742]






Tuesday, August 31, 2010

Police pelted with missiles by anti-fascist protesters during far-right Bank Holiday march | Mail Online




A clash between police and an anti-fascism group protesting against a march by the English Nationalist Alliance left two officers injured and resulted in 14 arrests today.
The Unite Against Fascism group took to the streets of Brighton, East Sussex, to protest against the march held by the far-right ENA, but ended up pelting police with missiles.

A Sussex Police spokesman said that the 250 protesters and marchers were kept apart by police but members of the UAF clashed with police.

A total of 14 arrests were made for public order offences, assault and to prevent a breach of the peace.

Police pelted with missiles by anti-fascist protesters during far-right Bank Holiday march | Mail Online

Saturday, August 28, 2010

Wealthy banker and wife want no rules on adoption. Yes, let's just flood the UK with thousands more immigrants, shall we?



I detest white, self hating, liberal, wealthy people. As individuals they mean well, but really, if they want to help the third world, why not just cash in the house, investments etc and go to the third world and give them their money, and then live in the same grinding poverty as the Mexican peons and the poor of the Barrios of Brazil? Why do they have to drag the rest of us into the mire of sanctimonious do-gooding?

This story is just one tiny facet of the stupidity, self centered and self congratulating liberalism that is wrecking the Western nations. Crap like this - green issues, gender politics, race awareness, equality campaigns - rolls on, and on, and on, and on, and on.....

There are tens of thousands of WHITE CHILDREN rotting in  the rape and murder centres that pass for local authority care in the UK. Why not adopt one of them, eh? A white child, with loving white adoptive parents - what a beautiful scene.

The council in question is right. Black children belong to the black community, and should be raised by their own people in their own ways. They should be encouraged to adopt black children more frequently. 


Too white to adopt: Politically-correct town hall officials tell banker and his wife they can't give a home to a black or Asian child

Cradling her daughter on her knee, Francesca Polini is every inch the loving, caring mother.

She and her banker husband have good incomes, a spacious home and a close network of family and friends. But their hopes of parenthood were ini­tially dashed when town hall bureaucrats said they were ‘too white’ to adopt a child.

Their rejection meant a child in care was denied the chance of a happy, com­fortable home and a stable future. And it casts a spotlight on a politically correct adoption system which routinely blocks white couples from giving a home to a child in need.

Mrs Polini, 40, and her husband Rick offered to adopt a black or Asian child, who wait longer for adoption because of a national shortage of ethnic minority couples looking to adopt.

But the couple claim officials in Ealing, West London, told them there was a cap on white parents adopting black or Asian children.

Officially, the council denies such a cap exists, but the case echoes those of other white, middle-class couples who have been barred from adopting for the same reason. Mrs Polini said: ‘The woman didn’t even meet us, she just told us on the phone, “I’m afraid you are too white for us to permit you to adopt one of our children”.

‘There was no assessment, it was based purely on our skin colour, and that shouldn’t be what quali­fies you to adopt. None of this is about the child’s best interests and frankly it’s immoral.’

Faced with their local authori­ty’s refusal to consider them as adoptive parents, the couple had to search abroad for a child to adopt.

Ironically, the same council which had refused their applica­tion to adopt a British child was happy to charge more than £4,000 to vet them for interna­tional adoption.

After overcoming a series of bureaucratic hurdles, they eventu­ally won permission to adopt a girl in Mexico. Gaia, now two, was granted British citizenship last year, and her parents hope to adopt a second child from Mexico.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1306887/White-couple-told-adopt-black-Asian-child.html#ixzz0xrz1TY3l
Oh good. A second alien child into the UK. Just what we need. 
Related Posts with Thumbnails