Keiser Report: Ghettofication of America, via Russia Today

This is a really good episode, Keiser's guest in the second half of the show is superb.

Scandal: Foreign Aid Budget is Twice as Much as British Higher Education Budget

Scandal: Foreign Aid Budget is Twice as Much as British Higher Education Budget

Evidence of the vicious anti-British nature of the Westminster parties has come with the “education budget cut” announced by the ConDem regime — which inadvertently revealed that the foreign aid budget is now twice as high as the higher education budget.

The shocking news was contained in the announcement by Chancellor George Osborne that the spending review cuts have meant that the higher education budget will be cut from £7.1 billion to £4.2 billion by 2014.

As bad as that news is, a quick look at the “ring fenced” foreign aid budget reveals that even prior to the recession, more money was being put aside for foreign aid than for higher education.

A “revised spending budget” issued by the Department for International Development (DFID) in June 2009 showed that the foreign aid budget for 2009/10 was £6.8 billion and was set to rise to £7.7 billion in the 2010/11 financial year.

The DFID announcement has deliberately understated the figures, hiding the true cost with an administrative trick. The figures they announced are only the direct aid programme, and not the total cost, which is called the “Gross Public Expenditure on Development” (GPEX) – which adds nearly £2 billion each year to total DFID expenditure.

For example, the GPEX in 2007/08 amounted to £6.027 billion, of which £5.2 billion was direct aid. The GPEX for 2006/07 was £7.4 billion, of which £4.9 billion was direct aid, and the GPEX for 2005/06 was £6.6 billion, of which £4.4 billion was direct aid.

NPI, 23rd Oct. 2010

Foreign Aid is the organized theft of the financial strength of white, British people and it's transference to third world regimes for social, political and sexual engineering games under the auspices of the United Nations.

And they're getting away with it. 

It is Communism, and most people are so saturated by food additives, fluoride in the toothpaste, TV and printed media and sport, the scum that operate tis fraud don't even bother to justify or hide it. They thing you are SHEEPLE, that you are stupid and easily frightened.

Appears that, generally, they're right.





  

In B&Q they cost 20p. So why does the NHS spend £99 for a screw to put in your hip? | Mail Online

Comment:

As engineering and manufacturing, the real core of any economy, was sold off at cut price and asset stripped by the government, from the mid nineteen sixties through to today, people who saw their jobs shipped to Asia and South America, jobs had to be found.

So, successive governments just spent more money, and employed more people, in the public services. Then as those companies who supplied manufacturing and engineering found their order books dry up, they realised that they could bleed the tax payer dry when supplying things essential to the operatio ofcolleges, schools and such like. And the government was happy to see it.

These policies have bled the system dry.  Millions now work either in, or supply, the public service. Everyone else works in supermarkets and burger bars for minimum wage. There's no money left, the banks are raping and pillaging the last few assets, and will soon relocate.

The end is near friends.

Every year, the NHS spends £500 million on orthopaedic equipment, but according to one insider they are being completely ripped off. In a damning expose, a medical sales rep, under the cover of anonymity, talks to VICTORIA ­LAMBERT about the used-car-sales ­tactics of ­companies which make millions from the NHS.


The NHS needs to save ­£20 billion in the next four years, according to the British Medical ­Association — yet in all the debate over which operations are at risk and whether we can afford new cancer drugs such as Avastin, there is one solution which could save the health service ­millions of pounds without costing a job or ­delaying treatment.

What could be so simple that politicians, ­doctors, managers and the public haven’t already considered it? Well, just this: the NHS needs to learn smarter shopping.
At the moment, most health trusts ­squander ­a fortune paying deliberately over-inflated prices for surgical supplies, each trust ­spending between £3million and £4million a year on ­orthopaedic supplies alone — money that could be saved overnight if managers just got together and agreed to flex their vast ­purchasing power and demand lower prices from the companies which produce the goods they need, or by being more rigorous in their decisions over which product to buy.
In B&Q they cost 20p. So why does the NHS spend £99 for a screw to put in your hip? | Mail Online