The Liberal Democrats could become "partner" of the Conservatives - one civil union too far?

Well well well.... they're already working out the result of the next election. If you voted Lib Dem, or Labour,  you may not want to read the following:

The conservatives are considering an informal pact with the LibDems under which they would urge people to make Nick Clegg's party their second choice at the next general election.

The historic pact, which could severely dent Labour's prospects of returning to power, would be proposed in the event of a Yes vote in next May's referendum on whether to replace the current first-past-the-post system with the alternative vote (AV).

Under the latter, people rank candidates in order of preference. The one who comes last drops out and second preferences are redistributed until one candidate wins more than 50 per cent of the votes cast.

In return, David Cameron would ask Mr Clegg to urge voters to make the Conservatives their second choice. Some Tory MPs are advocating such an agreement to keep Labour out of power. Although Liberal Democrat MPs are more cautious, they admit a pact would be a possibility if the Coalition proves successful. An unofficial pact is seen as more realistic than a more formal share-out of seats under which the Tories and Liberal Democrats did not stand against each other in some seats, including the 57 held by Mr Clegg's party.

A formal deal on seats has been suggested by Nick Boles, a Tory MP and prominent supporter of Mr Cameron's drive to modernise his party. But the Tory and Liberal Democrat leaderships admit that would provoke strong opposition from local party activists and have reassured them the two Coalition parties will both fight every seat at the next election.

Although Mr Cameron will urge voters to stick with the current system, there has been a growing recognition in Tory circles since the formation of the Coalition that a switch to AV could help the party's prospects. Ironically, Labour was the only party to back an AV referendum at this year's general election. Its pledge helped Mr Clegg persuade the Tories to allow a plebiscite as part of the Coalition agreement. Tory MP David Mowat, who had a majority of 1,553 over Labour in his Warrington South constituency in May, said: "If we did have AV and we put Lib Dems second and they put us second, it would be very likely to give us a better result than we might achieve under first-past-the-post. There could be a squeeze effect on Labour."

The down side for the LibDems is that such a voting pact could close the door to a Coalition deal with Labour if it emerged as the largest party after an election. One senior Liberal Democrat said: "This would be a win-win for the Tories. They are never going to form a Coalition Labour, but we might."

Liberal Democrats are confident that the AV referendum can be won even though the No campaign has been faster out of the starting blocks. They will try to make it a vote on the benefits of "coalition politics" rather than the Government's record. They believe the public like the idea of parties working together, even if they are worried about the spending cuts announced last month by George Osborne, the Chancellor.

Independent, 3rd Nov. 2010

It is worth remembering that the Powers That Be view us common folk as dumb cattle, stupid bovine cud-chewers, who roll out every few years and do what The Sun and the Daily mirror instructs us so to do. 

I would be sickened if I'd voted LD in the last election. The LD's are political whores, willing to deal with whoever can hand out a few baubles in return for their support.

Of course, I'm happy enough to see a change in the voting system, as they're always rigging the system to their own advantage anyway - the Boundary Commission is a prime example. Nothing changes, for they have all the prison cells and guns, so we have the system we've got and work within it.

It may just give smaller parties a bite out of the parliamentary cherry, such as the Greens and the BNP.

It may even implode the three main parties, which would be no loss, and a positive bonus, because we can force ideological and tactical difference from these shattered bodies - missing for thirty years. 

Common Purpose - Freemasonry for County Halls and Town Halls in Britain.

From the website: Stop Common Purpose.

The Hidden Agenda 

Update: 2010-05-15 The recent change of government is just an illusion. The same people are still pulling the strings. The hidden agenda continues. 

From 1997, the New Labour government worked to two agendas. Firstly, the open agenda as laid out in their manifestos and secondly, their hidden agenda. 

The objective of the hidden agenda is the creation of a Communitarian society controlled by the EU collective. 

In order to achieve this objective, the New Labour government ran a parallel administration made up of QUANGOs and fake charities. A fake charity is legally a charity but effectively operates as a government department, receiving a substantial amount of funding directly or indirectly from government and operating as a government department. 

The hidden agenda continues to operate under the coalition government.

The British parliament has become just a puppet organization. They merely go through the motions - the pretense of acting like a governing body, but the reality is they are just rubber stamping the programmes of the New World Order global communitarian technocrats. 

Common Purpose is a fraudulent 'educational charity' acting as a change agent and recruiter and is part of the management mechanism being used to carry out this hidden agenda. 

Whilst carrying out the hidden agenda, Common Purpose has corruptly abused millions of pounds of taxpayers' money. 

Common Purpose is guilty of defrauding YOU of YOUR money. 

Some people think that Common Purpose is simply a criminal organisation set up to siphon off public money but there is a lot more than that to the Common Purpose agenda. 

What is Common Purpose? 

On the surface, Common Purpose is an educational charity, registered in the UK under number 1023384, that does leadership and networking development training. 

However, Common Purpose is not what it appears to be on the surface.

In reality, Common Purpose is a corrupt, subversive, secretive and deeply sinister organisation with a hidden agenda (Communitarian social control, corporate and EU state control) and hidden backers (Tavistock Institute, Fabian Society, Brussels). 

Common Purpose is a change agent being used to recruit and train the commissars and apparatchiks needed to implement the hidden New World Order global communitarian technocratic agenda. 

Tory stooge floats the idea of releasing child rapists and murderers for community service.

The Tories have come up with a jolly wheeze.

They intend to open up the prisons and allow the wicked, deranged and murderous onto the streets. All in the interests of saving money.

Probation watchdog: serious crimes may be price to pay for cutting cost of justice

Murders and other serious crimes committed by prisoners released early from jail may have to be “accepted” by the public as part of attempts to keep down the cost of the criminal justice system, the probation watchdog suggested.

Daily Telegraph (UK) 12th July 2010

Andrew Bridges questioned whether it was worth keeping thousands of violent and dangerous offenders locked up for longer than the minimum jail term set by a court just to stop a few of them committing new crimes.

Some reoffending — even if it involved “serious” new crimes — could be the price that society had to pay for trying to cut down on the huge cost of the country’s rising prison population, said Mr Bridges, the chief inspector of probation. While acknowledging that prison reduced crime, he described it as a “rather drastic form of crime prevention” and said it was time to consider dealing with more offenders in the community.

There then. When your wife is raped, your child murdered, your father beaten senseless for his old age pension, that's the "price worth paying" Makes you feel warm inside, don't  it? 

Black Councillor spews racial hatred in Bristol.

Guardian 28th June 2010

Councillor found guilty of racial harassment over 'coconut' jibe

Shirley Brown, the first black Liberal Democrat elected to Bristol city council, called Asian opponent a 'coconut' during heated debate, court told

Shirley Brown, 48, the first black Liberal Democrat elected to Bristol city council, who employed the term about a Conservative, Jay Jethwa, denied committing an offence.

 Vicious bigot, Shirley Brown (above)

Bristol magistrates court heard the term was used to accuse someone of betraying their heritage by pandering to white opinion, just as a coconut was brown on the outside but white in the middle.

She was given a 12-month conditional discharge and ordered to pay £620 in costs. The chairman of the bench, Simon Cooper, told her the remark had been "purely gratuitous" and could have stimulated racial hatred.

 Innocent victim of racial harrasment, Cllr Jay Jethwa

Bristol magistrates court heard the term was used to accuse someone of betraying their heritage by pandering to white opinion, just as a coconut was brown on the outside but white in the middle.

She was given a 12-month conditional discharge and ordered to pay £620 in costs. The chairman of the bench, Simon Cooper, told her the remark had been "purely gratuitous" and could have stimulated racial hatred.

"You made a mistake for which you have to accept responsibility," he added. "It is a sad case."

Brown's remark came as she argued against a Conservative attempt in February 2009 to cut funds to the council's Legacy Commission, established in 2008, the year after the bicentenary of the abolition of the slave trade in the British empire.

"You made a mistake for which you have to accept responsibility," he added. "It is a sad case."

Brown's remark came as she argued against a Conservative attempt in February 2009 to cut funds to the council's Legacy Commission, established in 2008, the year after the bicentenary of the abolition of the slave trade in the British empire.

Of course, had a white man called the Councillor who has been in prosecuted a sooty, coon, wog or darkie, you can bet they would right now been rotting in a prison cell, career and like in tatters. 

Councillor Jethwa's great error was to suggest cuts to the feather bedding and make work schemes of the communists. She further -in ignorance or not - challenged the necessity  of another self flagellation session over the past historyof White wealthy power elites, paid for and watched by the white working class.  

In the seventies, when I was a child, the "Black Soilidarity Movement" represented all those who were not Caucasian, did it with panache (google Toxteth Riot, Brixton Riot etc). 

This is a first glimmer that ther "solidarity" is beginning to break down.

Of the millions of immigrants who have come to Britain, who still complains and whines about racism? If  you go into the council offices, who still appears to be there to "fill the (State created and enforced) ethnic mix"?

There are only two groups - Afro Carribeans, and Moslems. Everyone else seems, for good or bad, to have merely subsumed into the great stew of life. Perhaps the majority - Sikhs, Hindus, Nepalese, Poles etc are just too busy working and living, building for the future, enjoying the park, watching movies, buying Mars bars.