Savages riot in London, Manchester, Liverpool and Birmingham.

How Britain was, and should be again. A see of British faces, 1900. 

The outcome of mass immigration, the desperate liberal attempt at creating a multicultural society has fallen flat on it's arse once again. 

Enoch Powell told us, in plain English, what would come to pass. He was only wrong in his timing. Hordes of Immigrants, and the children of immigrants, with white youth blindly following,  following their coat-tails, are right now destroying the towns and cities of England. And that was the very purpose of their invitation in the first place: the destruction of all that was, and is, Britain. 

We have little or no Law with which to combat this: the Police have been ruined with "sensitivity training" and  "multicultural training" , and the punishments which will be imposed are a joke, with accommodation of the quality of a three star hotel. 

This has to be the last time. 
The corrupt dog and pony show which passes for government has to be swept away from their positions of power. They have consistently lied about the number of immigrants, the worthwhileness of immigration, and the outcome of immigration: they would have you believe that everything to do with immigration has just been peachy, a great success, and, basically, anyone who disagrees is just a nasty old hater. These scum have sold my, and my children's, birthright. They have handed my nation to a vicious barbaric and savage horde. 
But then the government is operated and owned by scum that can simply - up sticks and piss off abroad, if the shit hits the fan, can't they? They also ALWAYS get protection from the Law and the Police, and if necessary  - the Army. 
Law must be once again returned to the streets. The government is UNFIT, so we must take power and restore it. 
The flogging post, the gallows, the treadmill - all must return. The corrupt political appointments who pass for magistrates and judges must be hauled away and we must dispense Justice. 
Most importantly - each and every immigrant must be removed back to their place of origin. 

Crime not linked to recession. Bollocks.

Democracy is the great love of the failures and cowards of life. 

[R.J. Rushdoony, Thy Kingdom Come, 1978]

* * *

Brokenshire: 'There is no link between crime and the economy'

Minister for Crime and Security James Brokenshire says Britain's economic woes have not caused an increase in crime, despite a sharp rise in the number of UK burglaries, according to the British Crime Survey (BCS).

The survey of 45,000 households indicated that burglaries in England and Wales increased by 14 per cent in 2010-11 compared with the previous year.

The figures also showed a 6 per cent increase in violent crime with a sharp rises in domestic violence and assaults with minor injuries.

Minister for Crime and Security James Brokenshire denied there was a a rise "in recession-led crime" and argued the figures were not statistically significant.

Daily Telegraph, 14th July 2011

Only a politician can speak of a 14% rise in burglary, or a 6% rise in violent crime is "statistically insignificant".

The political class of Great Britain, like those of all Western nations,  have become completely dislocated from the real world. The exist in a bubble, of wealth, power and security.

Their incomes, their work, their life experiences are unlike 90% of the population.


Their children are never abused and sold as child prostitutes by Moslem child molesters.
Their wives are not gang raped by Somalian "asylum seekers" or refugees.
They are not murdered in their front garden by a gang of savages.
Their possessions are not stolen by junkie scum.  
They do not have to struggle with burglars inside their home. 
They do not watch their garden and home wrecked by vandals. 

Their income is guaranteed for their term of election, and most are reelected time after time - look at Tony Benn, Dennis Skinner, Ted Heath as examples: the vast majority sit for seats which rarely change allegiance, so thy are safe. Only a tiny minority of seats are swing seats, and an MP will move like lightening to a safe seat at the first opportunity. When they do retire they are kept in the lap of luxury with a gold plated, copper bottom, feather-bedded, taxpayer funded pension for life.

Crime isn't really bad. Unemployment is falling. We're doing something about immigration.  All these kinds of statements are the same sort of reassuring words you use to a child when thy ask difficult questions, but you can't ignore them.

They nod sagely and agree there are too many immigrants entering Britain, unemployment is terrible, housing is in short supply - whilst opening us to Syrian, Romanian,  Nigerian, Bulgarian, Liberian, Albanian, Egyptian, Ghanaian, Turkish, Botswanan, Iraqi, Iranian, Libyan, Afghani, Chinese, Kurdish, and South American immigration.

"We'll be tough on crime" they'll promise, whilst Ken Clarke MP, the whatever job title he is in the government  plans and plots to close prison places and flood the streets with criminals.

THEY NEVER SUFFER THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR ACTIONS. THEY ARE OF A SELECT CLASS, THE SERVANTS OF THE ELITE POWERS OF THE PLANET, THE ROTHSCHILD CLAN IN THE CITY OF LONDON, THE JESUITS IN THE VATICAN, AND THE JEWS IN WASHINGTON DC.

But their reassurances - they're not working any longer.

And as the political class becomes more distant from the people, only one of two things can be the conclusion: tyranny or revolution.  Presently the tyranny is building. Elections no longer matter, as the three parties in the UK which are in reality the governing class - Lib, Lab, Con - have philosophically merged, and now the discussion centres around the differing means to the predetermined end, rather than what the end is (death of ideological difference).

There is an implicit admission that things are unravelling. We already see that the multiculturalism and equalitarian dreams of the sixties have failed to come to fruition by voluntary choice, creating a colour blind, gender neutral socialist and co-operative commonwealth in Britain.

We have to have repressive laws because the people have failed to accept the wisdom offered by our ruling elite: including long prison sentences for those who will not comply by either by accepting the paradigm of a coffee coloured world or just keeping their mouths shut.

We are now fined for a thousand and one things which would, thirty years ago have been totally unacceptable by the mass of people. New regulations and laws are created by the ream each and every month, thousands of them, that we virtually "break the law" just by leaving the house. These of course, under real, Anglo Saxon Common Law, are nothing, unreal, and worthless. There is now power to just fine people without a trial (Magna Carta), but the government owns all the guns, all the police, all the courts and all the prisons, so are able to simply tax people to the nhilt (which is what these spurious fines really are - indirect  taxes).

Of course, while the police and other bodies are fining you for leaving your car parked more than 12" from the kerb, or leaving a trash bag by your wheelie bin on bin day, or some other non crime, REAL CRIMINALS, who REALLY break the REAL law, keep up their wickedness: drug dealers deal, rapists rape, murderers play X Box games in hotel style "prisons", Child Molesters are "understood" by health care professionals, and fraudsters are given community service hours. 

 * * * * 

St. Paul, in reminding the Corinthian Christians of their destiny, said, Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world? (I Cor. 6:2). Moffatt renders this, Do you not know that the saints are to manage the world?, a meaning we do not need to remind ourselves of. Church government is a prelude to world government, not by the church but by the saints. In trying to establish the necessary church government towards this end, Paul's constant appeal was, not to the form of church government or to the members, but to the law of God and the growth of the saints in terms of it (I Cor. 6:15-9:27). ....Judging, governing, or managing of the world is in terms of God's law. Because the saints were called to manage or govern the world, very quickly it became their purpose to move into positions of authority and power. 

[R.J. Rushdoony, The Institutes of Biblical Law (Nutley, NJ: Craig Press, 1973), pp. 773,742]

We're really in trouble, under a vicious tyranny: Two Gateshead (NE England) men arrested for watching 9/11 Koran burning video

WTF?

Men arrested in Gateshead over suspected Koran burning

BBC 23rd Sept. 2010 

Six Tyneside men have been arrested after filming themselves apparently burning copies of the Koran on the anniversary of the 9/11 attacks.

Police said the men, all from the Gateshead area, were detained after a video appeared on the Internet.

They were arrested on suspicion of inciting racial hatred and released on bail pending further inquiries.

ISLAM is NOT a "race" ! Islam is a proselyting, recruit wanting, religion, wherein for all it's other faults there is officially no colour bar: anyone can join. They are burning a book. Whether you like it or not, it is not a crime to burn a paper object in Britain, as long as that paper object is your property!

Two Gateshead men arrested for watching 9/11 Koran burning video

20th September 2010 

Civil Liberty correspondent

Warning from those practitioners of a peaceful religion

In a disturbing development, Northumbria Police in Gateshead last week arrested two men after they watched and shared a video on Facebook of a man burning the Koran in the US during the recent 9/11 commemoration at Ground Zero in New York. The men were drinking in the Bugle pub, Leam Lane, Gateshead, when they were arrested after watching and sharing the videos. Around 30 people staged a protest outside Gateshead police station on Wednesday evening, the 15th of September, following the arrests. The group stood outside the doors to the police station with an England flag for about three hours watched by a contingent of uniformed officers.The protesters had gathered at around 8pm after the two men were arrested earlier in the day on 'suspicion of inciting racial hatred'. The protest continued until around 11pm when the two arrested men were bailed pending further enquiries. In a further development, the man who actually burned the Koran in the video on 9/11 in New York has been sacked from his job. Derek Fenton, 39, of Bloomingdale, New Jersey, had worked for NJ Transit for 11 years as a conductor and train co-ordinator. One of his neighbours, Jacqui Marquez, said: "Good for him for burning the Koran. Everybody's entitled to their opinion. By firing him, they're sending a message that there's no freedom of speech. They're completely wrong for doing this." Youtube have now removed all footage of Derek Fenton burning the Koran. Of course, if he had burnt the Stars and Stripes (or any other flag or religious book) the video would still be available. Double standards by Youtube, perhaps? However, Civil Liberty has tracked down a blog which has embedded the video of Fenton's Koran-burning exploits and providing you are prepared to risk arrest from the British police, you can watch it here.

REMEMBER this voters, when you next hear the Police scream how short of funds they are.

Further links:

http://uk.ibtimes.com/articles/65079/20100923/gateshead-koran-burning-since-when-was-islam-a-race-and-why-are-the-police-watching-youtube-when-the.htm

Basis of English Laws. Until the Reds got their hands on the tiller of State.

Once upon a time, the English were responsible people. abided by the Law, and lived maily peaceable lives. There were few Laws, and those that were were easily learned. 

However for the few things that stood as "crimes" the Law dealt harshly with the perpertator.

There were no hate laws, no criminalisation of words, either. 

Quite right too.

King James Version

Exodus Chapter 21
 [1] Now these are the judgments which thou shalt set before them. [2] If thou buy an Hebrew servant, six years he shall serve: and in the seventh he shall go out free for nothing. [3] If he came in by himself, he shall go out by himself: if he were married, then his wife shall go out with him. [4] If his master have given him a wife, and she have born him sons or daughters; the wife and her children shall be her master's, and he shall go out by himself. [5] And if the servant shall plainly say, I love my master, my wife, and my children; I will not go out free: [6] Then his master shall bring him unto the judges; he shall also bring him to the door, or unto the door post; and his master shall bore his ear through with an aul; and he shall serve him for ever. [7] And if a man sell his daughter to be a maidservant, she shall not go out as the menservants do. [8] If she please not her master, who hath betrothed her to himself, then shall he let her be redeemed: to sell her unto a strange nation he shall have no power, seeing he hath dealt deceitfully with her. [9] And if he have betrothed her unto his son, he shall deal with her after the manner of daughters. [10] If he take him another wife; her food, her raiment, and her duty of marriage, shall he not diminish. [11] And if he do not these three unto her, then shall she go out free without money. [12] He that smiteth a man, so that he die, shall be surely put to death. [13] And if a man lie not in wait, but God deliver him into his hand; then I will appoint thee a place whither he shall flee. [14] But if a man come presumptuously upon his neighbour, to slay him with guile; thou shalt take him from mine altar, that he may die. [15] And he that smiteth his father, or his mother, shall be surely put to death. [16] And he that stealeth a man, and selleth him, or if he be found in his hand, he shall surely be put to death. [17] And he that curseth his father, or his mother, shall surely be put to death. [18] And if men strive together, and one smite another with a stone, or with his fist, and he die not, but keepeth his bed: [19] If he rise again, and walk abroad upon his staff, then shall he that smote him be quit: only he shall pay for the loss of his time, and shall cause him to be thoroughly healed. [20] And if a man smite his servant, or his maid, with a rod, and he die under his hand; he shall be surely punished. [21] Notwithstanding, if he continue a day or two, he shall not be punished: for he is his money. [22] If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman's husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine. [23] And if any mischief follow, then thou shalt give life for life, [24] Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, [25] Burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe. [26] And if a man smite the eye of his servant, or the eye of his maid, that it perish; he shall let him go free for his eye's sake. [27] And if he smite out his manservant's tooth, or his maidservant's tooth; he shall let him go free for his tooth's sake. [28] If an ox gore a man or a woman, that they die: then the ox shall be surely stoned, and his flesh shall not be eaten; but the owner of the ox shall be quit. [29] But if the ox were wont to push with his horn in time past, and it hath been testified to his owner, and he hath not kept him in, but that he hath killed a man or a woman; the ox shall be stoned, and his owner also shall be put to death. [30] If there be laid on him a sum of money, then he shall give for the ransom of his life whatsoever is laid upon him. [31] Whether he have gored a son, or have gored a daughter, according to this judgment shall it be done unto him. [32] If the ox shall push a manservant or a maidservant; he shall give unto their master thirty shekels of silver, and the ox shall be stoned. [33] And if a man shall open a pit, or if a man shall dig a pit, and not cover it, and an ox or an ass fall therein; [34] The owner of the pit shall make it good, and give money unto the owner of them; and the dead beast shall be his. [35] And if one man's ox hurt another's, that he die; then they shall sell the live ox, and divide the money of it; and the dead ox also they shall divide. [36] Or if it be known that the ox hath used to push in time past, and his owner hath not kept him in; he shall surely pay ox for ox; and the dead shall be his own.

The Queen has broken the terms of the English Bill of Rights (1689).

  The Queen has spent her entire reign selling the British folk down the river. She has never taken an opportunity to say no to any legislation, no matter what the situation or reality of it's purpose. We are clearly instructed that should the Monarch act in such a treasonous manner, we are to treat him as though they had died. (see below).

There is no hope of ever getting a prosecution. No court in the land would hear the case, no legal expert has the guts.

And whereas it hath been found by experience that it is inconsistent with the safety and welfare of this Protestant kingdom to be governed by a popish prince, or by any king or queen marrying a papist, the said Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons do further pray that it may be enacted, that all and every person and persons that is, are or shall be reconciled to or shall hold communion with the see or Church of Rome, or shall profess the popish religion, or shall marry a papist, shall be excluded and be for ever incapable to inherit, possess or enjoy the crown and government of this realm and Ireland and the dominions thereunto belonging or any part of the same, or to have, use or exercise any regal power, authority or jurisdiction within the same; and in all and every such case or cases the people of these realms shall be and are hereby absolved of their allegiance; and the said crown and government shall from time to time descend to and be enjoyed by such person or persons being Protestants as should have inherited and enjoyed the same in case the said person or persons so reconciled, holding communion or professing or marrying as aforesaid were naturally dead;and that every king and queen of this realm who at any time hereafter shall come to and succeed in the imperial crown of this kingdom shall on the first day of the meeting of the first Parliament next after his or her coming to the crown, sitting in his or her throne in the House of Peers in the presen e of the Lords and Commons therein assembled, or at his or her coronation before such person or persons who shall administer the coronation oath to him or her at the time of his or her taking the said oath (which shall first happen), make, subscribe and audibly repeat the declaration mentioned in the statute made in the thirtieth year of the reign of King Charles the Second entitled,  An Act for the more effectual preserving the king's person and government by disabling papists from sitting in either House of Parliament.
Bill of Rights, 1689, Wikipedia

communion:

[mass noun] the sharing or exchanging of intimate thoughts and feelings, especially on a mental or spiritual level:in this churchyard communion with the dead was almost palpable[in singular] :for a moment there was a blessed communion between them Oxford Dictionary.

Coronation Oath

The Coronation Oath (from the Order of Service for the Coronation of Elizabeth II in 1953) is administered in the form of questions:

Archbishop of Canterbury: Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the Peoples of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Canada, Australia, New Zealand,the Union of South Africa, Pakistan and Ceylon, and of your Possessions and the other Territories to any of them belonging or pertaining, according to their respective laws and customs?

Queen: I solemnly promise so to

Archbishop: Will you to your power cause Law and Justice, in Mercy, to be executed in all your judgements?

Queen: I will.

Archbishop: Will you to the utmost of your power maintain the Laws of God and the true profession of the Gospel? Will you to the utmost of your power maintain in the United Kingdom the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law? Will you maintain and preserve inviolably the settlement of the Church of England, and the doctrine, worship, discipline, and government thereof, as by law established in England? And will you preserve unto the Bishops and Clergy of England, and to the Churches there committed to their charge, all such rights and privileges, as by law do or shall appertain to them or any of them

Queen: All this I promise to do.

Then the Queen, arising out of her chair, supported by peers and with the Sword of State being carried before her, goes to the altar to make her solemn oath in the sight of all the people to observe the premises by laying her right hand upon the Holy Gospel in the great Bible (which was before carried in the procession and is now brought from the altar by the archbishop, and tendered to her as she kneels upon the steps), saying:

Queen: The things which I have here before promised, I will perform and keep. So help me God.

Then the Queen kisses the Bible and signs the Oath.

Coronation Oath, Wikipedia

So: the Bill or Rights forbids communion with the pope, Vatican or papists, and she has sworn to maintain the United Kingdom and dominions as Protestant.

In the EU, (which means in Britain) government is above the law.
The EU's corpus juris now pervades right through our legal system. A policeman was let off by magistrates this year (2005) for driving his private car at 159 mph in Ludlow, Shropshire. Under Corpus Juris the government are above the law and cannot be prosecuted The judge ruled correctly under EU law. 45,000 police officers got off speed cameras in this way in 2004, although their speeding killed 44 innocent people. (Daily Mail 27.12.05.)

EU "monitoring Officers" have the right to dismiss our Councillors.
The Local Government Act of 2000 empowered the head of the EU government in England, the Office of the Deputy Prime Minster (ODPM) to appoint a monitoring officer to spy on every council. If an elected councillor disagrees with the EU or government line, the unelected "Standards Board for England" can suspend him for up to five years. An example is in Cambridgeshire, where the ODPM has threatened cllr Alex Riley with suspension if he attends any debate discussing the ODPM's plans to build a new town of 20,000 people called Nothstowe on his ward. The ODPM has the conflict of interest here; but its powers are becoming absolute.

We have lost the right to freedom
The EU arrest warrant (signed by the Queen on 18th November 2003) allows us to be arrested without charge and held indefinitely with no right to see a solicitor, make a phone call, or even a right to a trial. You can simply disappear.
Under the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act (SOCPA) 2005, we can now be arrested and held in the cells by any police officer for any petty offence, like dropping litter. Before it had to be an offense that carried a 5 year jail term. This also applies to all of the EU's 107,000 regulations. Do you know them all?
The Civil Contingences Act 2004 allows government to confiscate anything you possess permanently; you have no right to object. This includes your house. It also gives government the right to forceably move its population around to different locations; you can be left with no place to call your own and live like a refugee. The only check and balance here is a Minister just needs to utter the words "This is a national emergency." If a demonstration or strike government doesn't like is being organised, they can cut off all communications in a town - phones, mobiles, the internet, TV, and block all access to that town including closing roads and railways. It has all the powers and more of Hitler's Enabling Act of 1933.
We have lost the right to free speech
At the Labour Party conference the police held an 82 year old man, Walter Woolfgang, and denied him access to the conference under the EU's "anti terrorist" legislation because he had shouted the word "nonsense" at Jack Straw, who was speaking about Iraq. Terrified the true nature of the laws they have passed on behalf of the EU was escaping too early, the Labour Party stopped the police and begged the man to return to conference.
On October 25th 2005 Miss Maya Evans was arrested under the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005, for a lone protest at the Cenotaph by reading out the names of the 97 British soldiers killed in the Iraq war. She was arrested by no less than 14 police officers and found guilty at Bow Street Magistrates Court on the 8th December 2005.
Would you hand over our nation, to be ruled by a foreign power, with oppressive laws like these, ? That's what's happening.

We have lost the right to protest
These laws make protest very difficult; if we did hold a General Strike and blockade Westminster it would now require some bravery: the powers the EU has demanded from our government enable it to respond in a way similar to the Chinese government's in Tiaanamen Square should it so wish.
It is no coincidence that since 2004, all MP's offices in Westminster are guarded by police with machine guns, inside and out.
The Governments "terrorism" deception
All these new EU laws, including massive "anti terrorism" acts (recently 2000, 2001, 2005) were passed with the pretence they were only directed at terrorists, or in the case of Asbos, ruffians who terrorise the streets. In each case they are used far more often against ordinary law abiding people, particularly to suppress dissent. (91% of those detained under Terrorism Acts are innocent and have been improperly arrested. Most of the remainder are charged with offences that have nothing to do with terrorism, but cover up over zealous arrests).
We have lost the right to life
Under EU law the "Shoot to kill" policy did not need democratic authorisation. Just two senior police officers authorised the police to kill British people. A democratic vote by Parliament was not required, but even that would not have legalised the killing under British common law. A recent victim was an innocent Brazilian, Jean de Menezes, shot dead in Stockwell underground station, even though he was being held down by police officers at the time of the execution. The police used dum-dum bullets, outlawed under the Geneva Convention because they blow a man to pieces inside.

eutruth.org

Corpus Juris is Vatican created and operated law.(Here) England operates under the Common Law system.

Why is the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland supplanting a tried-and-tested system of law and traditions of justice which have endured for 800 years? Why are we depriving ourselves of one of the greatest gifts we have given to the civilised world? Why are we abandoning our liberties and embracing the shackles of a foreign power?

And since this is manifestly not at the behest of the people, why are those who govern us seeking to abjure those very laws and customs which Her Majesty swore in her Coronation Oath to uphold?

 archbishop-cranmer.blogspot.com

To have enabled and allowed this evil European Union Roman Law to be introduced into the United Kingdom breaks the Monarchs coronation oath.

What is emerging in Europe is a new Holy European Empire, an attempt to resurrect the old Holy Roman Empire that existed under the Pope. This is becoming increasingly blatant.  The Vatican is playing a major role in the creation of the new European Empire, and Catholic social values — so-called “Christian Socialism” — are at its heart. The present Pope has repeatedly called for religious unity in Europe. This means a united, Catholic Europe, which was consecrated to Mary by the Vatican in 1309.

When I visited Strasbourg, the French city near the German border which, with Brussels, co-hosts the European Parliament, I was introduced to the head of the house of Habsburg, Otto von Habsburg, a man whose family dominated Europe for centuries. Full of charm and intelligence, he said that instead of war, a great new Europe could be built on peaceful cooperation. His ideas go far beyond this, however. In his book, The Social Order of Tomorrow, he writes:

Now we do possess a European symbol which belongs to all nations equally. This is the crown of the Holy Roman Empire, which embodies the tradition of Charlemagne, the ruler of a united occident . . . the Crown represents not merely the sovereignty of the monarch, but also the ties between authority and the people. True, it is the monarch who is crowned, but in this sacred act he appears as the representative of the whole people. It should therefore be considered whether the European head of state, as the protector of European law and justice, should not also become the guardian of a symbol which, more than any other, represents the sovereignty of the European community.

Dr. Habsburg wants to see Europe have an elected head of state — a man elected for life. This influence of both Charlemagne and the Habsburgs hangs heavily over the new federal Europe. The crown of Charlemagne, the first person to attempt to revive the Roman Empire in 800 AD, is an inspiration to those who promote the breaking down of nation states, and a Charlemagne prize has been established for those who work hardest for European unity. One who did was ex-President Clinton, who in June 2000, was the first American president to receive the Charlemagne prize for his work in promoting European unity. He received the prize at the cathedral in Aachen, Germany, where the first Holy Roman Emperor lies buried. Clinton called for an enlargement of the EU to even take in Russia. 

http://www.inplainsite.org/html/european_union.html#Superstate

Enough proof?

Either The Bill of Rights 1689 stands in Law or it should be abolished.

Why not? Why is it still in FULL FORCE? Why does no parliament ever just strike it through with a vote?

They cannot. I don't know why, I don't understand it, but they cannot.

Top Cop warns of riots in Britain as the economy goes down the drain.

The political system is operated as a false paradigm: the three major parties are merely facets of the global Elite. Communism, Fascism, Libertarianism, Socialism, all the same, all deadly. They exist to rule us at the diktat of the world of the International Finance power-brokers. 

Daily Mail, 14th September 2010

Public sector cutbacks could lead to riots, one of the country's top police officers will warn this week.

Derek Barnett, president of the Police Superintendents Association, believes the country is facing a 'period where disaffection, social and industrial tensions will rise'.

His gloomy views are outlined in a draft copy of a speech he will give to his organisation's annual conference in Chester tomorrow.

His comments come just days after the Police Federation claimed the loss of up to 40,000 frontline police jobs because of Government cuts would be 'Christmas for criminals'.

Today, former Lib Dem leader Charles Kennedy became the first high profile Government backbencher to attack the cuts. Mr Kennedy said it was important not to 'throw the baby out with the bath water' when deciding where and how deep to wield the axe.haqvehaqve

Mr Barnett, in his first major address since taking over as head of the Police Superintendents Association earlier this year, will say tomorrow: 'We know that funding will be reduced, but the Government has to recognise that no matter how important dealing with the current financial problems may be, there will be an inevitable dilution of front line services if police budgets are cut too severely.

But here's the really interesting bit from the story:

'As we jail fewer criminals, there will be more criminals at large.

'As police funding is reduced there will simply be fewer police officers on the streets. Many forces are not recruiting, indicative of the financial climate which now prevails.

In his speech, due to be delivered in front of the Home Secretary Theresa May, he adds that the public have 'a right to know' the extent of the likely cuts in policing.

 Really? Might have been nice if this had been taken into consideration by the government BEFORE they released THOUSANDS of criminals under "Early Release" schemes. Thousands of rapists, murderers, and generally vicious thugs are wandering the streets, who are going to lose their welfare payments in the near future....


This is EXACTLY WHAT THE COMMUNISTS IN PARLIAMENT AND OUTSIDE OF IT WANT - Britain to become so disrupted they can slip into an open dictatorship. 


This is why the Euro Police have been set up, and why European soldiers are allowed to serve in Britain in a "security role". They have known this is coming for many years, just not when, because all communistic societies fall to bits under the weight of their own contradictions. 


And now, the Prison Officers are threatening strikes: 

Daily Telegraph 14th Sept 2010

Steve Gillan, leader of the Prison Officers’ Association, said his members were prepared to strike – even though they are not allowed to by law.

He told a fringe meeting at the Trades Union Congress: “If they are going to kick us to death we will take action irrespective of the legislation.

Gutless self hating White people are the problem.

I am sick of immigrants, irrespective of colur, religion or race. You all make me spew. You come here, pleading your need for help, and the moment you get here you can't wait to spew hatred, violence and your barbaric mediaeval religions.

None of you have an ounce of gratitude the moment you get the first fat welfare cheque. You are rewarded for your status, and even when there are laws to stop the welfare circus, the communists in Europe, who control the legal system, step in and change the laws.

But however sickened I am by greedy, violent, savage immigrants roaming the streets, screwing the taxpayer  with implicit threats of violence if they don't get their way, it's nothing compared to the millions of self hating, gutless white sheeple who are willing to whittle on about immigration, foreigners etc., but are unwilling to do anything to remove them.

Daily Mail July 2010

Britain’s fast-rising population is now close to 62million, the latest count showed yesterday. 

Numbers of people in the country went up by 394,000 to reach 61,792,000 by the middle of last year, the Office for National Statistics said. 

The increase of 0.6 per cent on the previous year means the population has been rising at the same rapid rate since the Millennium, mainly driven by high levels of immigration.

You self centered Daily Mail reading bastards are willing to talk in huddled groups, with friends, quietly in kitchens and living rooms. But the moment you have an opportunity do do something - what? Nothing. You'll just keep paying the blackmail payments.

MAVERICK Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi provoked outrage last night by demanding £4.1billion a year from the EU to stop illegal immigration “turning Europe black”.Colonel Gaddafi, in a speech in Italy, claimed his country needed the money for security measures to stop thousands of Africans heading across the Mediterranean.Gaddafi’s remarks, dismissed as blackmail last night, came on the last day of a two-day visit to Italy which had already sparked controversy when he urged all Europeans to convert to Islam and lectured 200 models and actresses on the Muslim faith.In his farewell speech in Rome, the 67-year-old dictator said: “

Italy needs to convince her European allies to accept this Libyan proposal: five billion euros to Libya to stop illegal immigration. Europe runs the risk of turning black from illegal immigration, it could turn into Africa.“We need support from the European Union to stop this army trying to get across from Libya, which is their entry point. At the moment there is a dangerous level of immigration from Africa into Europe and we don’t know what will happen.“What will be the reaction of the white Christian Europeans to this mass of hungry uneducated Africans?“

We don’t know if Europe will remain an advanced and cohesive continent or if it will be destroyed by this barbarian invasion. We have to imagine that this could happen but before it does we need to work together.”

Daily Express, 1st September 2010

We have millions of people without work. They are told that there will be little support for them. We have millions of people with crippling  disabilities who have been told in no uncertain terms that the days of sitting in front of the TV with a pizza, claiming Disability Living Allowance to go to the Bingo Hall are finished. 


Millions are living in substandard accommodation, or are homeless. Millions of others are working like dogs in poorly paid employment being bled white for taxes. 


And yet millions of third worlders will be given free rein to come, live and bleed Britain dry. 


Britain is of course not alone in this surrender. Sarkozy, the French government leader, has recently been shovelling the Gypsies back to Romania, because millions of French people are appaled at the behaviour of these people and what happens? White people bumble around, talking about brotherhood and racism. Useful self hating idiots of the New World Order to a man and woman.

When dictatorship comes to Britain, it will not be because the Communist-Fascists have millions of members, but because you white self haters were too scared to have an opinion.

Of course, I bet you'll all be whining still, won't you?

Execute the dealers, punish criminal junkies.

Only the worst kind of white, self hating liberal would disagree with this.

The drug dealing and usage is a moral and social hazard. Punishment of drug dealing by the death penalty, and restraint and containment of junkies until they are clean.

Governments coniders stopping junkies welfare payments.

People dependent on drugs and alcohol who refuse treatment could have their welfare benefits withdrawn under plans being considered by the Home Office.

The idea is in a consultation paper on the government's drug strategy for England, Wales and Scotland.

The proposals also suggest that addicts on benefits should not be required to seek work while receiving treatment.

Some experts have suggested that withdrawing benefits could lead addicts into crime and prostitution.

The Labour government intended to carry out pilot schemes this year to get drug users into work.

Under the plans, addicts who failed to attend a treatment awareness programme would lose welfare benefits.

Tory stooge floats the idea of releasing child rapists and murderers for community service.

The Tories have come up with a jolly wheeze.

They intend to open up the prisons and allow the wicked, deranged and murderous onto the streets. All in the interests of saving money.

Probation watchdog: serious crimes may be price to pay for cutting cost of justice

Murders and other serious crimes committed by prisoners released early from jail may have to be “accepted” by the public as part of attempts to keep down the cost of the criminal justice system, the probation watchdog suggested.

Daily Telegraph (UK) 12th July 2010

Andrew Bridges questioned whether it was worth keeping thousands of violent and dangerous offenders locked up for longer than the minimum jail term set by a court just to stop a few of them committing new crimes.

Some reoffending — even if it involved “serious” new crimes — could be the price that society had to pay for trying to cut down on the huge cost of the country’s rising prison population, said Mr Bridges, the chief inspector of probation. While acknowledging that prison reduced crime, he described it as a “rather drastic form of crime prevention” and said it was time to consider dealing with more offenders in the community.

There then. When your wife is raped, your child murdered, your father beaten senseless for his old age pension, that's the "price worth paying" Makes you feel warm inside, don't  it?