Keiser Report: Ghettofication of America, via Russia Today

This is a really good episode, Keiser's guest in the second half of the show is superb.

Norway killings being used to push Multicultural policy of the Frankfurt School's Culturalist Marxists.

D'oh! The Cops in Norway knew the killers name BEFORE his arrest:

Despite being portrayed by the media as inept due to the length of time it took them to reach the island of Utoeya, it has now emerged that police knew the name of gunman Anders Behring Breivik before they even arrested him, a startling admission that prompted one of Britain’s top news anchors to question how authorities were aware of the gunman’s identity in advance.
During his Channel 4 News broadcast on Friday evening, host Jon Snow asked “why police knew the killer’s name by the time they had arrived on the island,” reported the Telegraph live blog.
“He surrendered the moment police called his name 3 minutes after they arrived. What we don’t know is how the police knew the terrorist’s name before they arrested him,” said Snow, who is recognized as one of Britain’s most trusted news anchors, and cannot be dismissed as a “conspiracy theorist”.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/police-knew-gunmans-name-before-arrest.html

They haven't been able to make Multiculturalism work spontaneously, in the Western nations, so now these terrible State organised and controlled actions in Norway are going to be the lynch-pin to forcing acceptance of Multiculturalism, with the fear of being seen as a "Terrorist", "Nazi" or potential murderer. 
This whole conspiracy is to switch the fear rhetoric of the tyrannous scum who operate Western governments, from Islamic terrorism (tired, wearing thin) , to "Homegrown" terrorism (the terrorists are everywhere, you can't identify them etc). ID cards, more CCTV, longer holding by the Police without charge blah blah blah ..... The Sky News reports that the Police (front men for MI5) are already attacking legitimate political organisations in the UK: 

Scotland Yard's counter terrorism chief, assistant commissioner Cressida Dick, has been requested to supply specialist officers to join a new European task force dedicated to investigating European-wide far right links to a bomb attack in Oslo and a shooting spree on Utoya Island.
http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/World-News/Norway-Metropolitan-Police-To-Join-European-Wide-Force-Probing-Far-Right-Links-Of-Attacks-Suspect/Article/201107416036718?f=rss

His handlers in MOSSAD/CIA/MI6 couldn't even be bothered to create a "new" backstory for this patsy.

The 32 year-old appears to have quoted verbatim large sections from the preaching of Theodore Kaczynski in his 1500 page online rant.Breivik had “copied and pasted” almost a dozen key passages from the 69 year-old’s 35,000 manifesto, only changing particular words such as “leftist” with “cultural Marxist”.It remains unclear what his motivations were, but experts said it appeared he had taken “inspiration” from Kaczynski whose two decade parcel-bomb terror campaign killed three people and 29 injured others.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/norway/8658269/Norway-shooting-Anders-Behring-Breivik-plagiarised-Unabomber.html

They just rehashed someone else's ramblings. 

The whole story stinks: 

Given the fact that the establishment media got it spectacularly wrong by instantly jumping to the conclusion that Friday’s deadly attack in Norway was the work of Al-Qaeda Muslims, placing complete trust in the details emerging about gunman Anders Behring Breivik would be foolish, especially since there are innumerable inconsistencies and contradictions that need to be studied before a fuller picture of what motivated the bloodshed can be established.
The rush to blame Muslims for the carnage, hastily parroted by an onslaught of mainstream “terror experts,” was a startling insight into how the propaganda that fuels the war on terror is so unquestionably bounced around the echo chamber of the corporate media.
It’s also a reminder that the mainstream press instantly falls in line with whoever the establishment designates the enemy du jour to be at any given time. Now that Muslims have been so vehemently demonized as terrorists, it’s the turn of so called “right-wing extremists,” or anyone who disagrees with mass immigration, loss of sovereignty and globalist financial looting, to feel the heat.
The effort to smear European conservatives as unhinged radicals who harbor simmering urges for bloodlust is now in full swing, and it’s a demonization campaign firmly founded on the carefully crafted public portrayal of Anders Behring Breivik.

However, it’s quickly becoming apparent that just as many eyewitnesses reported two gunmen on the island where the rampage unfolded, there are two different personas behind Breivik himself.
Indeed, there are two different Facebook profiles for Breivik, one from before the massacre and one from after. The latter profile appears to have been embellished and deliberately altered to emphasize the notion that the gunman was motivated by his “Christian conservative” beliefs.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/anders-behring-breivik-manufacturing-a-patsy.html

Press TV, mouthpiece of the Islamic Theocracy of Iran, which really is a rather nasty vicious little State run by theological psychopaths, , is cock-a-hoop: 

Islam, and their useful white European idiots (such as this "Peter Ruston/ Chris Bamberry pairing in the video above)  are now empowered by the Elites to scream Hate, and Terrorist, at any disagreement with Islamic theological stances, and with attempting to turn the savage barbarian tide away from European shores. 
White people of Europe are in real trouble, worse than they have EVER been. rememberer: these hate ridden bastards - useful idiots of the Western oligarchies, are the true face of Islam. People in Europe aren't frightened of Islamics and Islam for reasons of terrorism,but because of the murder and mayhem prevalent in whatever society Islam gains control of. They need to go from Europe by choice or force. They do not belong here, any more than white folk belong in Iran, Saudi Arabia or Syria. 

Anyhow: these are interesting alternative media takes on the situation of the shooter and Norway:  : 

http://classicalvalues.com/2011/07/not-civilians-but-traitors-to-be-executed/

http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2011/07/25/knights-templar-honesty-and-hypocrisy/

http://thebuckshotter.blogspot.com/2011/07/oslo-bomber-is-freemason-and-zionist.html

Freedom and liberty in the UK press is dying.

Comment: I am CERTAIN that in the near future there will be "privacy" legislation, which will be the start of a Department of Censorship, no doubt known as MiniTruth to anyone who has read 1984. It will ostensibly be there to protect the families of murdered schoolchildren, maimed ex soldiers, and others whose private grief shouldn't be impinged upon. 

However this will not really exist for this purpose but to protect the WEALTHY, the POWERFUL, and the WICKED from the press. It will make such items as the recent superinjunction affair, involving Members of Parliament, dolly bird chasing  Footballers etc. much more difficult for the UK press to report. 

But this is not the MAJOR reason for the Fall of the House of Murdoch. 

There is a great deal of worthwhile speculation in this piece, and I highly recommend the blog from which I republish this from, if you want to see the filthy, depraved real world of political activity in the UK. 

World’s End Shouldn’t Cost Freedom of the Presshttp://order-order.com/2011/07/10/worlds-end-shouldnt-cost-freedom-of-the-press/

Guido has read the News of the World since he was a paperboy in West London over 30 years ago. Those who don’t read it think “The Screws” is all titillation, randy vicars and soap stars. It is that and also great popular campaigning journalism at its best, reflecting the concerns of people other than Islington Indy readers.
Politicians, the corrupt and evil feared it, today is a good day for them. Unfortunately when the drive to get the story crossed over into illegally hacking the phones of victims of tragedies, the good guys became bad guys. It has always been the case that the best stories often have a dubious legal provenance involving deception, subterfuge or law breaking, that is done to get at the truth that wrongdoers are hiding. Investigative journalists everywhere, including this blog, do it because it is the only way to get the truth. Using the dark arts to sell more newspapers with ghoulish tales is, as many have said, disgusting and unacceptable.Momentum is building for press regulation, politicians of all parties are keen to tame the feral press. Public opinion is shifting towards them. This would be a mistake. The rich and the powerful in this country would like nothing better than to have a craven and beholden press. In many countries this is exactly what they have and ordinary people are worse off for it. Privacy laws are a trojan horse for censorship.Privacy from intrusion by the state or journalists who break the law by stealing photographs, hacking, climbing over the wall into your back garden, that should be protected. Privacy laws should not be a means to hide embarrassment for those who can afford to hire Schillings. That way lies an untouchable ruling elite.In the end Murdoch closed the News of the World because he feared an advertiser and consumer boycott (plus to try take the heat off the Sky takeover). If you disapprove of a newspaper don’t buy and read it. That is simply the most powerful restraint you have on newspaper proprietors in a free democracy. Even Rupert Murdoch fears his customers.Restrictive press laws will be circumvented in the borderless internet age, however Guido would rather not have to try to expensively fight the good fight from permanently offshore. Meantime Guido wishes both his friends and enemies at The Screws the best of luck for the future. Oh, and thanks for paying the kids’ school fees.

Libya, it's all about peace, prosperity and liberty, right?

NB : I DESPISE Islam here in Western nations. What the bunch of sub human savages choose to do in their own nations, what philosophies they choose to accept, idols they worship - IN THEIR HOMELAND - I care not a jot. They have every right to live as they will, as long as they all fuck off from the West and allow us to do AS WE CHOOSE. 

There's a rule of thumb in the household of which I am the totalitarian Dear Leader, that if The Guardian is huffing out some fuckwittery about any given subject, it's generally sane to see the opposite as true.

Look at Deputy Leader of the Labour Party, Harriet Harman PC MP, the Guardian loves her and no-one who isnt either (1) a physically and emotionally castrated man or (2) a mouth breathing closet or open bull dyke does. 

And the same is true for the whole Libya bollocks. And the whole Arab Spring crap too. If you're some Social Worker, blubber over the plight of the Yemenis, or Libyans, or Egyptians this is going to come hard to you - the whole thing is about a NEW WORLD ORDER and a billion followers of Islam are in the way.It's not about changing the world so that the lion lays down with the lamb, no-one's beating swords into ploughshares, it's about COMMUNISM.

Not the bullshit "Workers Paradise" that the sheeple, the useful idiots ((c) VI Lenin) dream of when reading Socialist Review, or the Morning Star. Anarchism, Socialism, Communism, Social Democracy, Liberal Democracy, Liberalism, Libertarianism, Syndicalism, Conservatism - are all created to fool and blind the mass of people.

Oh no.

This is about communism for the RICH, the POWERFUL, the ELITES of the world. Their COMMUNISM always ensures they WIN, they remain all powerful, always in control.

The rest of us get CAPITALISM, the harshest, free market version of capitalism, the rule by faceless, impersonal, inhuman   CORPORATIONS of seven billion people. We get bled, beaten, jailed, exploited, stripped of our assets, killed, taxed, spied on, fined, starved and raped (metaphorically and literally) in one degree or another, depending on time and place.

The last standing relatively free peoples of the world are the vast swathes of the Middle East. They reject what is now the standing system of the world conomic system - the Coca Cola & Porn Free Market.

They have cranky ideas - such as Usury being an evil thing, Homosexuality being a no-no, Alcohol  being forbidden,by their god, same with pornography, and that life isn't about making the biggest  pile of gold before you die. These cranky ideas don't fit with the Jew Talmud, which declares that all other creatures except them are for use by them, live or die at their behest. For profit. 

So, retarding the Arab folk back, using IMF tactics of smashing public services, combined with the reintroduction of the more retarded flavours of Islam - from, for example, the Moslem Brotherhood and The Saudi Wahabbists (both children of MI6, now MOSSAD/MI6/CIA ) : 

"The Jesuits created the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in 1932 using their fanatical, Islamic cult known as "Wahhabi Islam." Wahhabi Islam, "the Sword of the C...hurch" intended to be used against apostate, White Protestant, Western Civilization, was a creation of the Society of Jesus using certain Papal Knights controlling the once Protestant British Empire. With the Empire having been governed by the Order through Freemasonry for the last two hundred years, Wahhabi Islam was fortified during the reign of that wicked, Jesuit-controlled murderer of the Irish people, Queen Victoria of England. British SIS agent, English noble and Knight of Malta, Sir John Philby, feigned himself to be a Wahhabi among the Arabs, thereby facilitating the enthronement of Masonic Ibn Saud as the first king of Saudi Arabia. Both Freemasons Winston Churchill and, yes, Benito Mussolini, whose confessor was a powerful Italian Jesuit and the Secretary of the Company, Pietro Tacchi-Venturi, also aided in the establishment of the Masonic Islamic Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. "Allied" Britain and "Axis" Italy worked together, as they would during Jesuit-trained, Jesuit-favored and Jesuit-advised, Pope Pius XII's World War II, the grand finale of the Black Pope's SecondThirty Years' War (1914-1945)."http://www.thyselfknown.com/profiles/blogs/the-muslim-brotherhood-and-the

Much of the "Arab Spring" is a sideshow: funded by and organised by MI6/MOSSAD/CIA, assisted by GOOGLE, TWITTER and FACEBOOK. The ONLY beneficiaries are the VATICAN city state, spiritual hub of the NWO, who is seeing the re-establishment of it's lost North African ancient Empire, the city state of WASHINGTON DC, military HQ of the NWO,  which gains a real foothold in North Africa, and our playmates in the CITY OF LONDON, the world financial city state, which forsees billions in cash to snap up assets in the failing western nations at pennies in the pound. 

There is one major prize: LIBYA. 

In no particular order :

(1) Gaddafi made a deal to sell LIBYAN OIL to China, boogeyman of the Neocons. 

(2) Gaddafi spent large sums on housing and welfare for the Libyan people, bad for profit.

(3) Gaddafi was attempting to build a "United States of Africa", bad for business.

(4) Gaddafi had planned for Libya to become (a) self sufficient in major foods, and then (b) for Libya to become a breadbasket for Africa. Ditto. 

(5) Gaddafi had bluntly and publicly questioned the role of the Saudi royal family in political activities. Bad news for the House of Saud. 

(6) Gaddafi took control of the crude oil under Libyan soil and has refused to allow western corporations to profit from it - Libyans have had a fair slice of the cake, as it were.... Bad for profit. 

etc. 

WATCH THE VIDEO:

No war for Israel, no war for BP. If you support the war against Libya, that's in reality what you're doing. And when these Jew owned, Jesuit controlled, bastards and children of the Synagogue of Satan, have finished with Johnny Arab, he'll turn on us. In this issue, we stand together or by God we'll hand separately.

WATCH THE VIDEO:

This person - man or woman, or collective, I know not - writes far better than I do, and he, she, they are better researched than I am. http://aangirfan.blogspot.com/

Cameron loves the European Union, just like all good liberals.

Reposted with thanks, as I feel this man has found one of the very nubs of the problem of Britain and the EU : the Tories have swindled us into believing they are eurosceptic (which many members and a few MP's certainly are) whilst, in practicable political terms they - the leadership - are most certainly europhile.

DaveWatch: Cast-Iron Cameron's latest transparent ploy to kick Europe into the long grass

Gerald Warner (LINK to the blog post) 

How was it for you? Dave’s Churchillian moment – you know, his blood, sweat and tears offering this afternoon that promised Britain freedom from the domination of dark forces on the continent – did it reassure you? The latest pledges from Cast-Iron Cameron do not include a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty, of course, but what metropolitan sophisticate would take those sort of histrionics seriously?

No, we are entering exciting new territory in the great Conservative Euro-scam. There will be a referendum – wait for it! – on all future EU treaties. The chancers in Brussels, having got everything they wanted, have made it clear they will not be writing any more treaties for a long time, so this is just a tad academic.

An important point: a Cameron government will not try to claw back any serious powers within six months or a year of taking office. No, our salvation will be worked out “over a parliament”. That is a polite term for five years of procrastination, to kick the EU issue into the long grass. But Dave will be pressing for “repatriation” of powers over employment law, the charter of fundamental rights and criminal law.

Uh-huh? Correct me if I am wrong, but surely those “competences” are all deeply embedded in reams of small print within the Lisbon Treaty. So, to renegotiate them, Dave and William Hague would have to re-open the treaty. But we are told the treaty is so set in concrete it cannot be revised and that is why voters cannot have a referendum on it. If the British electorate cannot revisit it, how can Dave and William do so? Do they take us all for mugs (evident answer: yes)?

But soft! This is by no means the limit of Cast-Iron Dave’s munificence. Through the mechanism of a sovereignty Bill, he is going to give us a constitutional court to protect us from EU encroachment. Just 24 hours after we saw a grey-faced Vaclav Kraus tell the world that, thanks to the ruling of an EU-compliant constitutional court, the Czech Republic had ceased to exist as a sovereign nation, Dave is offering us a similar chocolate fireguard to defend our sovereignty. Gee, thanks, Dave. What can I say? (I mean, what can I say that would be printable?)

A constitutional court would be a charter for judicial activism such as we daily see sell out British rights and interests to asylum seekers, terrorists, EU bureaucrats, et al. As for renegotiating a few minor aspects of the Lisbon Treaty, why does Cameron imagine he will carry more clout if he goes into the negotiating chamber without the massive endorsement of the electorate in a referendum, which would set real alarm bells ringing in Brussels, rather than with such a mandate?

All this Tory Euroguff is no more than a device to persuade gullible voters to stay with Dave and his forsworn party. Whether you fall for it or not is a simple intelligence test. Presumably, too, these scrappy, mini-commitments are as “cast-iron” as his previous unconditional pledge of a referendum. Tory rhetoric has now shifted, desperately, to a platform of preserving the remaining sovereign powers that Britain possesses post-Lisbon. What powers would those be, Dave?

The EU is popular with all liberals (left and right) because it BYPASSES Parliament, Constitution, and Law. The comrades in the Labour Party under Kinnock got this in the mid eighties - all their wet dreams could be foisted onto Britain not by long drawn out debates in Westminster, by arguing at the elections, but by diktat from an unelected Commissioner-Dictator from the EU Commission. And the lunatic libertarian "free market" & "no borders" Libertarians realised it earlier - imagine MILLIONS of Poles, Romanians, Bulgarians, Slovaks, falling over themselves to live on a pittance, in overcrowded slums, filling the chicken slaughtering factories, laying the foundations of glass and concrete Cathedrals of Capitalism.....

The Tories will not save us from tyranny because they are part of it.

Basis of English Laws. Until the Reds got their hands on the tiller of State.

Once upon a time, the English were responsible people. abided by the Law, and lived maily peaceable lives. There were few Laws, and those that were were easily learned. 

However for the few things that stood as "crimes" the Law dealt harshly with the perpertator.

There were no hate laws, no criminalisation of words, either. 

Quite right too.

King James Version

Exodus Chapter 21
 [1] Now these are the judgments which thou shalt set before them. [2] If thou buy an Hebrew servant, six years he shall serve: and in the seventh he shall go out free for nothing. [3] If he came in by himself, he shall go out by himself: if he were married, then his wife shall go out with him. [4] If his master have given him a wife, and she have born him sons or daughters; the wife and her children shall be her master's, and he shall go out by himself. [5] And if the servant shall plainly say, I love my master, my wife, and my children; I will not go out free: [6] Then his master shall bring him unto the judges; he shall also bring him to the door, or unto the door post; and his master shall bore his ear through with an aul; and he shall serve him for ever. [7] And if a man sell his daughter to be a maidservant, she shall not go out as the menservants do. [8] If she please not her master, who hath betrothed her to himself, then shall he let her be redeemed: to sell her unto a strange nation he shall have no power, seeing he hath dealt deceitfully with her. [9] And if he have betrothed her unto his son, he shall deal with her after the manner of daughters. [10] If he take him another wife; her food, her raiment, and her duty of marriage, shall he not diminish. [11] And if he do not these three unto her, then shall she go out free without money. [12] He that smiteth a man, so that he die, shall be surely put to death. [13] And if a man lie not in wait, but God deliver him into his hand; then I will appoint thee a place whither he shall flee. [14] But if a man come presumptuously upon his neighbour, to slay him with guile; thou shalt take him from mine altar, that he may die. [15] And he that smiteth his father, or his mother, shall be surely put to death. [16] And he that stealeth a man, and selleth him, or if he be found in his hand, he shall surely be put to death. [17] And he that curseth his father, or his mother, shall surely be put to death. [18] And if men strive together, and one smite another with a stone, or with his fist, and he die not, but keepeth his bed: [19] If he rise again, and walk abroad upon his staff, then shall he that smote him be quit: only he shall pay for the loss of his time, and shall cause him to be thoroughly healed. [20] And if a man smite his servant, or his maid, with a rod, and he die under his hand; he shall be surely punished. [21] Notwithstanding, if he continue a day or two, he shall not be punished: for he is his money. [22] If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman's husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine. [23] And if any mischief follow, then thou shalt give life for life, [24] Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, [25] Burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe. [26] And if a man smite the eye of his servant, or the eye of his maid, that it perish; he shall let him go free for his eye's sake. [27] And if he smite out his manservant's tooth, or his maidservant's tooth; he shall let him go free for his tooth's sake. [28] If an ox gore a man or a woman, that they die: then the ox shall be surely stoned, and his flesh shall not be eaten; but the owner of the ox shall be quit. [29] But if the ox were wont to push with his horn in time past, and it hath been testified to his owner, and he hath not kept him in, but that he hath killed a man or a woman; the ox shall be stoned, and his owner also shall be put to death. [30] If there be laid on him a sum of money, then he shall give for the ransom of his life whatsoever is laid upon him. [31] Whether he have gored a son, or have gored a daughter, according to this judgment shall it be done unto him. [32] If the ox shall push a manservant or a maidservant; he shall give unto their master thirty shekels of silver, and the ox shall be stoned. [33] And if a man shall open a pit, or if a man shall dig a pit, and not cover it, and an ox or an ass fall therein; [34] The owner of the pit shall make it good, and give money unto the owner of them; and the dead beast shall be his. [35] And if one man's ox hurt another's, that he die; then they shall sell the live ox, and divide the money of it; and the dead ox also they shall divide. [36] Or if it be known that the ox hath used to push in time past, and his owner hath not kept him in; he shall surely pay ox for ox; and the dead shall be his own.

Who is the enemy?

KJV: Matthew Chapter 7

 [13] Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: [14] Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it. [15] Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves
 

They all serve ....

They come in all shapes and sizes...

Killing us softly with multiculturalism.

He served his masters well. 

The Chinese military are creating a Navy, ordering 8 aircraft carriers in the last two years. 

 

Avarice, Usury. 

Fluoride and TV.

Cannibalism, child rape  and Babylon Mysteries.

The Moslem is the muscle of the Talmudic Zio-Communist

No salvation in Odinism.

 

Appealing but deadly. 

1984

Who watches the watchers?

Godless science, a rejection of Yahweh.

The EU is in the hands of Jesuit educated lackeys. 

Pacifism is moral and political cowardice, the very reason we're in the mess we're in. A false gospel. 

Yes, Fascism has lost it's real meaning. 

200,000,000 or more dead in the twentieth century. Beat Fascism hands down , and did it - tacit or upfront - with the support of the supine "leaders" and financiers of the West.

 ALL of them are...

BEWARE

 

The Queen has broken the terms of the English Bill of Rights (1689).

  The Queen has spent her entire reign selling the British folk down the river. She has never taken an opportunity to say no to any legislation, no matter what the situation or reality of it's purpose. We are clearly instructed that should the Monarch act in such a treasonous manner, we are to treat him as though they had died. (see below).

There is no hope of ever getting a prosecution. No court in the land would hear the case, no legal expert has the guts.

And whereas it hath been found by experience that it is inconsistent with the safety and welfare of this Protestant kingdom to be governed by a popish prince, or by any king or queen marrying a papist, the said Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons do further pray that it may be enacted, that all and every person and persons that is, are or shall be reconciled to or shall hold communion with the see or Church of Rome, or shall profess the popish religion, or shall marry a papist, shall be excluded and be for ever incapable to inherit, possess or enjoy the crown and government of this realm and Ireland and the dominions thereunto belonging or any part of the same, or to have, use or exercise any regal power, authority or jurisdiction within the same; and in all and every such case or cases the people of these realms shall be and are hereby absolved of their allegiance; and the said crown and government shall from time to time descend to and be enjoyed by such person or persons being Protestants as should have inherited and enjoyed the same in case the said person or persons so reconciled, holding communion or professing or marrying as aforesaid were naturally dead;and that every king and queen of this realm who at any time hereafter shall come to and succeed in the imperial crown of this kingdom shall on the first day of the meeting of the first Parliament next after his or her coming to the crown, sitting in his or her throne in the House of Peers in the presen e of the Lords and Commons therein assembled, or at his or her coronation before such person or persons who shall administer the coronation oath to him or her at the time of his or her taking the said oath (which shall first happen), make, subscribe and audibly repeat the declaration mentioned in the statute made in the thirtieth year of the reign of King Charles the Second entitled,  An Act for the more effectual preserving the king's person and government by disabling papists from sitting in either House of Parliament.
Bill of Rights, 1689, Wikipedia

communion:

[mass noun] the sharing or exchanging of intimate thoughts and feelings, especially on a mental or spiritual level:in this churchyard communion with the dead was almost palpable[in singular] :for a moment there was a blessed communion between them Oxford Dictionary.

Coronation Oath

The Coronation Oath (from the Order of Service for the Coronation of Elizabeth II in 1953) is administered in the form of questions:

Archbishop of Canterbury: Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the Peoples of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Canada, Australia, New Zealand,the Union of South Africa, Pakistan and Ceylon, and of your Possessions and the other Territories to any of them belonging or pertaining, according to their respective laws and customs?

Queen: I solemnly promise so to

Archbishop: Will you to your power cause Law and Justice, in Mercy, to be executed in all your judgements?

Queen: I will.

Archbishop: Will you to the utmost of your power maintain the Laws of God and the true profession of the Gospel? Will you to the utmost of your power maintain in the United Kingdom the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law? Will you maintain and preserve inviolably the settlement of the Church of England, and the doctrine, worship, discipline, and government thereof, as by law established in England? And will you preserve unto the Bishops and Clergy of England, and to the Churches there committed to their charge, all such rights and privileges, as by law do or shall appertain to them or any of them

Queen: All this I promise to do.

Then the Queen, arising out of her chair, supported by peers and with the Sword of State being carried before her, goes to the altar to make her solemn oath in the sight of all the people to observe the premises by laying her right hand upon the Holy Gospel in the great Bible (which was before carried in the procession and is now brought from the altar by the archbishop, and tendered to her as she kneels upon the steps), saying:

Queen: The things which I have here before promised, I will perform and keep. So help me God.

Then the Queen kisses the Bible and signs the Oath.

Coronation Oath, Wikipedia

So: the Bill or Rights forbids communion with the pope, Vatican or papists, and she has sworn to maintain the United Kingdom and dominions as Protestant.

In the EU, (which means in Britain) government is above the law.
The EU's corpus juris now pervades right through our legal system. A policeman was let off by magistrates this year (2005) for driving his private car at 159 mph in Ludlow, Shropshire. Under Corpus Juris the government are above the law and cannot be prosecuted The judge ruled correctly under EU law. 45,000 police officers got off speed cameras in this way in 2004, although their speeding killed 44 innocent people. (Daily Mail 27.12.05.)

EU "monitoring Officers" have the right to dismiss our Councillors.
The Local Government Act of 2000 empowered the head of the EU government in England, the Office of the Deputy Prime Minster (ODPM) to appoint a monitoring officer to spy on every council. If an elected councillor disagrees with the EU or government line, the unelected "Standards Board for England" can suspend him for up to five years. An example is in Cambridgeshire, where the ODPM has threatened cllr Alex Riley with suspension if he attends any debate discussing the ODPM's plans to build a new town of 20,000 people called Nothstowe on his ward. The ODPM has the conflict of interest here; but its powers are becoming absolute.

We have lost the right to freedom
The EU arrest warrant (signed by the Queen on 18th November 2003) allows us to be arrested without charge and held indefinitely with no right to see a solicitor, make a phone call, or even a right to a trial. You can simply disappear.
Under the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act (SOCPA) 2005, we can now be arrested and held in the cells by any police officer for any petty offence, like dropping litter. Before it had to be an offense that carried a 5 year jail term. This also applies to all of the EU's 107,000 regulations. Do you know them all?
The Civil Contingences Act 2004 allows government to confiscate anything you possess permanently; you have no right to object. This includes your house. It also gives government the right to forceably move its population around to different locations; you can be left with no place to call your own and live like a refugee. The only check and balance here is a Minister just needs to utter the words "This is a national emergency." If a demonstration or strike government doesn't like is being organised, they can cut off all communications in a town - phones, mobiles, the internet, TV, and block all access to that town including closing roads and railways. It has all the powers and more of Hitler's Enabling Act of 1933.
We have lost the right to free speech
At the Labour Party conference the police held an 82 year old man, Walter Woolfgang, and denied him access to the conference under the EU's "anti terrorist" legislation because he had shouted the word "nonsense" at Jack Straw, who was speaking about Iraq. Terrified the true nature of the laws they have passed on behalf of the EU was escaping too early, the Labour Party stopped the police and begged the man to return to conference.
On October 25th 2005 Miss Maya Evans was arrested under the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005, for a lone protest at the Cenotaph by reading out the names of the 97 British soldiers killed in the Iraq war. She was arrested by no less than 14 police officers and found guilty at Bow Street Magistrates Court on the 8th December 2005.
Would you hand over our nation, to be ruled by a foreign power, with oppressive laws like these, ? That's what's happening.

We have lost the right to protest
These laws make protest very difficult; if we did hold a General Strike and blockade Westminster it would now require some bravery: the powers the EU has demanded from our government enable it to respond in a way similar to the Chinese government's in Tiaanamen Square should it so wish.
It is no coincidence that since 2004, all MP's offices in Westminster are guarded by police with machine guns, inside and out.
The Governments "terrorism" deception
All these new EU laws, including massive "anti terrorism" acts (recently 2000, 2001, 2005) were passed with the pretence they were only directed at terrorists, or in the case of Asbos, ruffians who terrorise the streets. In each case they are used far more often against ordinary law abiding people, particularly to suppress dissent. (91% of those detained under Terrorism Acts are innocent and have been improperly arrested. Most of the remainder are charged with offences that have nothing to do with terrorism, but cover up over zealous arrests).
We have lost the right to life
Under EU law the "Shoot to kill" policy did not need democratic authorisation. Just two senior police officers authorised the police to kill British people. A democratic vote by Parliament was not required, but even that would not have legalised the killing under British common law. A recent victim was an innocent Brazilian, Jean de Menezes, shot dead in Stockwell underground station, even though he was being held down by police officers at the time of the execution. The police used dum-dum bullets, outlawed under the Geneva Convention because they blow a man to pieces inside.

eutruth.org

Corpus Juris is Vatican created and operated law.(Here) England operates under the Common Law system.

Why is the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland supplanting a tried-and-tested system of law and traditions of justice which have endured for 800 years? Why are we depriving ourselves of one of the greatest gifts we have given to the civilised world? Why are we abandoning our liberties and embracing the shackles of a foreign power?

And since this is manifestly not at the behest of the people, why are those who govern us seeking to abjure those very laws and customs which Her Majesty swore in her Coronation Oath to uphold?

 archbishop-cranmer.blogspot.com

To have enabled and allowed this evil European Union Roman Law to be introduced into the United Kingdom breaks the Monarchs coronation oath.

What is emerging in Europe is a new Holy European Empire, an attempt to resurrect the old Holy Roman Empire that existed under the Pope. This is becoming increasingly blatant.  The Vatican is playing a major role in the creation of the new European Empire, and Catholic social values — so-called “Christian Socialism” — are at its heart. The present Pope has repeatedly called for religious unity in Europe. This means a united, Catholic Europe, which was consecrated to Mary by the Vatican in 1309.

When I visited Strasbourg, the French city near the German border which, with Brussels, co-hosts the European Parliament, I was introduced to the head of the house of Habsburg, Otto von Habsburg, a man whose family dominated Europe for centuries. Full of charm and intelligence, he said that instead of war, a great new Europe could be built on peaceful cooperation. His ideas go far beyond this, however. In his book, The Social Order of Tomorrow, he writes:

Now we do possess a European symbol which belongs to all nations equally. This is the crown of the Holy Roman Empire, which embodies the tradition of Charlemagne, the ruler of a united occident . . . the Crown represents not merely the sovereignty of the monarch, but also the ties between authority and the people. True, it is the monarch who is crowned, but in this sacred act he appears as the representative of the whole people. It should therefore be considered whether the European head of state, as the protector of European law and justice, should not also become the guardian of a symbol which, more than any other, represents the sovereignty of the European community.

Dr. Habsburg wants to see Europe have an elected head of state — a man elected for life. This influence of both Charlemagne and the Habsburgs hangs heavily over the new federal Europe. The crown of Charlemagne, the first person to attempt to revive the Roman Empire in 800 AD, is an inspiration to those who promote the breaking down of nation states, and a Charlemagne prize has been established for those who work hardest for European unity. One who did was ex-President Clinton, who in June 2000, was the first American president to receive the Charlemagne prize for his work in promoting European unity. He received the prize at the cathedral in Aachen, Germany, where the first Holy Roman Emperor lies buried. Clinton called for an enlargement of the EU to even take in Russia. 

http://www.inplainsite.org/html/european_union.html#Superstate

Enough proof?

Either The Bill of Rights 1689 stands in Law or it should be abolished.

Why not? Why is it still in FULL FORCE? Why does no parliament ever just strike it through with a vote?

They cannot. I don't know why, I don't understand it, but they cannot.