The British Establishment is as depraved and deluded as that of Nero and Caligula.

Malcolm McDowell as Caligula

This is an interesting reply to a comment, from the author of a blog post at Occidental dissent. The post is interesting too, and well worth a read.  

Hunter Wallace says:July 26, 2011 at 4:44 pm Nero wasn’t nearly as deluded as David Cameron.
Among the Ancients, there were individual emperors who were moral degenerates or who were crazy (Caligula and Nero being the most famous examples), but Roman society was too reality based to succumb to fantasy ideology.
Back then people could see that Nero was crazy and out of control. Now, thanks to fantasy ideology, which pervades entire societies thanks to television and movies, and the general detachment of “symbolic engineers” in office parks from the physical creation of wealth, lunatics can sound completely normal and mainstream.
Compare David Cameron to Nero. The former thinks that Muslims can successfully be integrated into British society. Nero plan’s was to weep before his enemies in order to impress them.
What about Caligula’s great victory over Poseidon? Isn’t that like LBJ’s War on Poverty?

Fleet Street swings behing the new Elite meme: Moslems are peace loving beatnicks, the "right wing extremists" are the real danger (now).

The governments of western Europe have carried out endless acts of treason against their own people for at least 100 years. Their actions have been in direct opposition to the good of their own people, to their national interest, and more broadly to the world (actions cause reactions).

An Elite of European based, globalist, internationalist, liberal-fascistic political psychopaths have used war - 1914 - 18, 1939 - 45, the Cold War, Afghanistan in the eighties, Gulf war I and II, now the destabilisation in the Mediterranean and Levant - and global structures based around NATO and the UN - to create what has always been the dream of Elitists : a  New World Order, risen from the ashes of chaos they themselves have created.

PROBLEM - REACTION - SOLUTION.




Watch the video:

"The oligarchs - and a few lawyers and priests and so forth who lived on them - are the lords of the earth. Everything exists for their benefit. The ordinary people, the workers - are their slaves. They could do what they liked with you. They could ship you off to Canada like cattle. They could sleep with your daughters if they chose. They could order you to be flogged with something called a cat-o'-nine tails. You had to take your cap off when you passed them. Every oligarch went about with a gang of lackeys. Salvation Army, Roman Catholics, Jews, Indians - and other sorts - were lackeys, parasites, flunkies of the ruling class."

 http://www.orwelltoday.com/rulers.shtml

The media have begun to spin this - after false start - and are whipping up the same kind of fears that were so succesful after 9/11 and 7/7. The boogiemen now, of course, are not Moslems - brutal and vicious as they are, were mere patsies in the grand scheme of 9/11 and 7/7 - but white European "right wing extremists". 

The largest section of the RECORDS DEPARTMENT, far larger than the one on which Winston worked, consisted simply of persons whose duty it was to track down and collect all copies of books, newspapers, and other documents which had been superseded and were due for destruction. The hunting-down and destruction of books had been done with thoroughness and it was very unlikely that there existed anywhere in Oceania a copy of a book printed earlier than 1960. Books were recalled and rewritten again and again, and were invariably re issued without any admission that any alteration had been made. Even the written instructions never stated or implied that an act of forgery was to be committed: always reference was to slips, errors, misprints, or misquotations which it was necessary to put right in the interests of accuracy. But actually it was not even forgery. It was merely the substitution of one piece of nonsense for another. Statistics were just as much a fantasy in their original version as in their rectified version. A great deal of the time you were expected to make them up out of your head.
http://www.orwelltoday.com/past.shtml

The Elite merely creates the new meme, their fellows in the media publicise and propagate it, it becomes accepted, the past forgotten. 

From the website of the BNP:

Norway – The double standards of the Marxist Liberals
By Maid of Kent – After the shocking massacre committed last Friday in Norway by fanatic Anders Behring Breivik, the Marxist ‘Liberal’-dominated media in Britain have had a field day in their attempts to connect Breivik to ‘far-right’ groups in the UK. Naming these groups as the EDL and with no evidence to support their claims, including the name of the British National Party in their biased articles and news reports, the Marxist ‘Liberal’ media reveals a blatant attempt to blacken the name of the British National Party and associate us with the monstrous crime committed by Breivik.
With the inference that these ‘far-right’ groups are extremists, the mainstream media conveniently ignores the fact that the policies of the British National Party are not ‘far right’ by any measure, and, before the decades of forced cultural Marxism, our policies were considered normal commonsense measures necessary for the preservation and health of our nation and people and were actively pursued by the Lib/Lab/Con parties themselves.
Their evil attempt to associate the British National Party with a mass murderer in order to brainwash their audience into thinking that our party and its members and supporters are all willing and capable of emulating these wicked deeds reveals the determination of the Marxist ‘Liberal’ establishment to destroy any legal and valid opposition to their unpopular and destructive policies.
Perhaps the most revealing aspect of the Marxist ‘Liberal’ media reports and the response from the Lib/Lab/Cons and their associated political parties in occupied Europe is their condemnation of all Nationalist parties and movements throughout Europe, linking us all to extremists and terrorists and, in an article in the Daily Mail, even to German Nazis.
As any reasonable and unbiased person will know, Nationalism is not about far-right or far-left politics, or any politics in between. Nationalism is the wish to preserve your people and their culture and traditions and to see your people live in peace and prosperity in their homeland.
This is not an unreasonable wish and appears to be acceptable to the Marxist ‘Liberals’ where non-European countries are involved, but becomes unacceptable to them when we demand the same.
However, the most breathtaking hypocrisy is revealed by the Marxist ‘Liberal’ reaction to this horrific massacre in Norway compared to their reaction to similar terrorist massacres perpetuated by Muslim murderers.
While the mainstream media has invited opinion from every hysterical Marxist Liberal it can find to denounce the ‘evil’ Nationalist movements of Europe who refuse to see their countries and indigenous people subjected to mass invasion by people from alien and incompatible cultures, after the London tube and bus bombings in 2005, this same Marxist Liberal elite bleated that ‘we’ had to find a way to ‘open up a dialogue’ with the races and cultures that had produced the terrorist murderers to try to prevent similar events in the future.
With no hysterical condemnation of these alien invaders from incompatible cultures, who seek to change the British way of life through force and terror, but instead seeking to cravenly capitulate to their unacceptable demands by attempting to blame the invaded native population for not managing to ‘open dialogues’ and ‘finding ways to accommodate’ these invaders, the Marxist Liberal elite reveal their true aims and intentions, which are to suppress any indigenous dissent and to support the destruction of our native peoples and cultures by enforced mass immigration.
While Breivik is undoubtedly mentally unstable, more than possibly as a result of his Marxist-mandated unstable childhood – a childhood inflicted on millions of other Europeans in order to destroy our societies – this instability was no doubt intensified by a seething anger at what had happened to his homeland as a result of the European elitist plan to destroy the countries and people of Europe through the mass immigration of people from alien and incompatible cultures.
That many other native Europeans feel a similar seething anger has been ignored by the European elite and their political parties who force their perverted ideology and nation-destroying policies upon us.
Will these same political parties, including the Lib/Lab/Cons, seek to ‘open a dialogue’ with the disaffected and marginalized indigenous Europeans whom they have ignored for decades in order to prevent similar atrocities in the future? Will they attempt to ‘find ways to accommodate’ the wishes of the people that they were supposed to represent all along?
Don’t hold your breath. It’s one rule for the unwanted invading immigrants and another rule for the rightful inhabitants of Europe – the European people.
On the contrary, instead of seeking to open dialogue and finding ways to accommodate the wishes of the majority of native Europeans, these European elites and their political parties like the Lib/Lab/Cons seek to destroy legitimate and peaceful opposition to their policies by demonising Nationalist parties like the British National Party by attempting to associate us with despicable murderers like Breivik.



http://www.bnp.org.uk/news/norway-–-double-standards-marxist-liberals

Freedom and liberty in the UK press is dying.

Comment: I am CERTAIN that in the near future there will be "privacy" legislation, which will be the start of a Department of Censorship, no doubt known as MiniTruth to anyone who has read 1984. It will ostensibly be there to protect the families of murdered schoolchildren, maimed ex soldiers, and others whose private grief shouldn't be impinged upon. 

However this will not really exist for this purpose but to protect the WEALTHY, the POWERFUL, and the WICKED from the press. It will make such items as the recent superinjunction affair, involving Members of Parliament, dolly bird chasing  Footballers etc. much more difficult for the UK press to report. 

But this is not the MAJOR reason for the Fall of the House of Murdoch. 

There is a great deal of worthwhile speculation in this piece, and I highly recommend the blog from which I republish this from, if you want to see the filthy, depraved real world of political activity in the UK. 

World’s End Shouldn’t Cost Freedom of the Presshttp://order-order.com/2011/07/10/worlds-end-shouldnt-cost-freedom-of-the-press/

Guido has read the News of the World since he was a paperboy in West London over 30 years ago. Those who don’t read it think “The Screws” is all titillation, randy vicars and soap stars. It is that and also great popular campaigning journalism at its best, reflecting the concerns of people other than Islington Indy readers.
Politicians, the corrupt and evil feared it, today is a good day for them. Unfortunately when the drive to get the story crossed over into illegally hacking the phones of victims of tragedies, the good guys became bad guys. It has always been the case that the best stories often have a dubious legal provenance involving deception, subterfuge or law breaking, that is done to get at the truth that wrongdoers are hiding. Investigative journalists everywhere, including this blog, do it because it is the only way to get the truth. Using the dark arts to sell more newspapers with ghoulish tales is, as many have said, disgusting and unacceptable.Momentum is building for press regulation, politicians of all parties are keen to tame the feral press. Public opinion is shifting towards them. This would be a mistake. The rich and the powerful in this country would like nothing better than to have a craven and beholden press. In many countries this is exactly what they have and ordinary people are worse off for it. Privacy laws are a trojan horse for censorship.Privacy from intrusion by the state or journalists who break the law by stealing photographs, hacking, climbing over the wall into your back garden, that should be protected. Privacy laws should not be a means to hide embarrassment for those who can afford to hire Schillings. That way lies an untouchable ruling elite.In the end Murdoch closed the News of the World because he feared an advertiser and consumer boycott (plus to try take the heat off the Sky takeover). If you disapprove of a newspaper don’t buy and read it. That is simply the most powerful restraint you have on newspaper proprietors in a free democracy. Even Rupert Murdoch fears his customers.Restrictive press laws will be circumvented in the borderless internet age, however Guido would rather not have to try to expensively fight the good fight from permanently offshore. Meantime Guido wishes both his friends and enemies at The Screws the best of luck for the future. Oh, and thanks for paying the kids’ school fees.

Great Britain is disappearing up it's own are.

Along with most other White, western nations Great Britain is slowly (and soon to be rapidly) disappearing up it's own arse, socially, legally and financially. So it's good to know that our politicians at the local level have got their priorities right:

A campaign has been launched to outlaw smoking in all public places in Stony Stratford near Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire.
If passed, the new bylaw would mean anyone caught lighting up in the historic market town would face a fine.
Senior politicians on the town’s council have indicated their support for the scheme, which comes after the mayor of New York banned smoking from parks and beaches in the US city last month.
The town’s council will discuss the concept next month before Milton Keynes Council is likely to be asked to use its powers to introduce the ban.
Stony Stratford Councillor Paul Bartlett, who is leading the campaign, said: "When you walk through the high street in any town, smoke is in your face and harming you and any children there.
"Smokers then get their butt, which is full of saliva, and chuck it on the floor. It costs millions to clear street rubbish.”
The ban, which would be the first of its kind in the country, would be enforced by Police Community Support Officers, traffic wardens and members of the public.
Cllr Robert Gifford, chairman of town’s council, described the ban as "appealing".
"A result of the smoking ban is that smokers now go outside and drop their cigarette butts all over the streets," he said.
"In principle the idea of a street smoking ban is appealing, but there may be other solutions to the problem of second hand smoke and litter."
The idea has received mixed reactions, with some smokers in the area complaining that fining people for lighting up outdoors is excessive.
Anne Gregory, 56, a smoker from Stony Stratford, said: "I agree that it's disgusting when cigarette butts get thrown on the floor but it would be nice to see more bins around instead.
"A smoking ban is taking it too far. Saying there is a risk of passive smoking when you're walking down the street is ridiculous.
"Nobody likes a smoker in your face but it's no bother if you're outside."
Amanda Sandford, spokeswoman for Action on Smoking and Health, said the move in Stony Stratford would make it the first place in Britain to impose a total ban on smoking in public.
She said: "Passive smoking is very unpleasant and we are already seeing the health benefits of the indoors ban with a fall in heart and lung disease.
"An unintended consequence of the indoor smoking ban is that more smokers are on the streets dropping litter and this ban would prevent that.
"We have heard of councils banning smoking on play parks and beaches but this would be the first blanket ban on smoking in Britain."

The Daily Telegraph, 29th June 2011 

Wake up time. Repatriation now.

Awwwww ......

Record 1m pupils speak English as a second language

Almost one million schoolchildren speak English as a second language, official figures show, sparking claims that mass immigration is placing a “huge strain” on the education system. 

22nd June 2011

Daily Telegraph 

Immigrants are flooding int5o every corner of the United Kingdom. It is no longer the case that it's only London, Birmingham, Manchester and Bradford.

They are fighting a war with the womb. They are outbreeding the indigenous WHITE population by 2 to 1.

Immigrant children grow - with State aid - into Islamic adults.

Nothing by accident, all done deliberately by a small, committed group of psychopaths. This lunatic lives in Sweden. They are all across Europe, all serving the Synagogue of Satan, including Britain.

You hypoctitical bastard, David Cameron.

The Frankfurt Institute is behind the great social changes in the nations of the west since WW2. It is a COMMUNIST, JEW body whose intent is to destroy the West, and to remove the White folk from the face of the planet.

Read these if you have never heard of it:

Frankfurt Schood (Wikipedia)
Sugar daddies of feminism

Griffin's to yellow to say "Jew",so replaces Jew with Communist (which these Jews certainly were)  but he's right (taking that into account): 

For the past fifty years, it has been a deliberate State policy throughout the Western nations to destroy the role of the family, and to separate the act of conception from the long term role of the Father.

First the abortion act and the free supply of contraception.
Secondly the destruction of the moral order, via abortion and contraception, and the opening of trades and careers to women as an ALTERNATIVE to motherhood.
Thirdly  the reworking of the welfare and local authority housing system to deliberately negate the social, economic and financial facets of the family.
Finally the Legal system has made fathers second class citizens in the family courts, barring access to the father's of children where divorce or separation has arisen  on the slightest cause.

Fathers were simply made an unessential part of society, except for their role as sperm container and applicator.

And the birth rate has plummeted. So came the necessity for mass immigration - see? This all happens in the sixties as the baby boom children of the post WW2 era came into working age, so would marry and themselves have children, negating the long-term need for Negroids and Asiatics to permanently reside in the UK..... and making it far harder to rape the economy, and destroy the white race.

Like it or not.

The Jew wants a permanent end to the White race, and it's replacement will be a degraded, racially mixed mud people, ignorant, retarded, with no history, no culture other than that doled out by the Jew Media giants.

Recently, you'll remember that the Tories have repeatedly about cutting Welfare benefits: each time they've backed down. Why?

Negroes, and ESPECIALLY polygamous MOSLEMS would suffer hardest under any cuts to the Welfare system. Who, realistically, could have twelve children, or three wives and fifteen children and support thm from working?

So to hear this piece of interbred elitist trash lecture us on family and fatherhood is sickening to say the least:

Cameron condemns absent dads

 19th June 2011

Absent fathers must be treated by society in the same way as drink drivers, David Cameron argues today. The Prime Minister, defending the traditional family in an article marking Father's Day, says Britain should be made a "genuinely hostile" place for fathers who abandon their families.

Mr Cameron also reiterates his promise for tax breaks for married couples, a Tory manifesto policy which has yet to be introduced.

"I want us to recognise marriage in the tax system so that as a country we show we value commitment," Mr Cameron writes in The Sunday Telegraph.

He adds: "It's high time runaway dads were stigmatised, and the full force of shame was heaped upon them. They should be looked at like drink-drivers, people who are beyond the pale."

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/cameron-condemns-absent-dads-2299751.html

We modern day British Babylonians have managed to create a living hell for ourselves in 60 years. We elected a communist government in 1945, and from thereon in we have gaily re-elected these communists - blue and red varieties, they're the same thing - to fill the British Isles with the dregs of the planet.  

That's not to say in the short term the real, indigenous people of the British Isles, the Anglo Saxon & Celtic, along with the small number of other WHITE, EUROPEAN folk who have settled, from the French Hugenots from Vatican persecution in the fifteenth century to the Poles and Ukranians of the post WW2 period, didn't gain a few, small and it appears temporary crumbs from the table whilst the Beast government in Westminster worked it's evil population replacement plan.  

They reorganized health care, wghich was a mess, into the National Health Service. They reorganized Social Welfare services, built some Council Housing, offered some dental care. The last real money - the 0.500 silver Shilling - was removed from circulation in 1947, gold having gone in 1914 from public circulation, and was replaced by base metal and paper tokens, allowing an endless series of credit booms and expansion of the Welfare State through the printing of paper and the stamping out of base metal tokens to pay the bills. 

It's why a Kit Kat cost three pennies in 1958 and fifty pennies now - our money has been debased and it is worthless. The Beast in Westminster knew precisely what they were doing, too.  

Anyhow.  

After WW2, the UK found itself light by several hundred thousand people for work - due to the death and mayhem of the war. This of course should have lead to a rise in wages - demand for workers means rates rise.Remember - millions had fought and struggled for six years (1939 - 1945) believing they were maintaining the "Way Things Were" in Britain. That included the status quo as far as King and Empire went: almost all of the UK's major markets for goods were contained within the Dominions (Canada, New Zealand, Australia, South Africa and India) and the colonies - (Jamaica, Uganda, Kenya, Nigeria etc).  

This was of course NOT part of the plan for the Beast: they were intent on disassembling the Empire as fast as they could, starting with Ghana and India in 1947. This was done because, whilst Churchill was babbling about pearls set in a shining sea, he was busy signing away Britain's future economy to the Jews on Wall Street and the US Federal government. 

The Beast in Westminster hit upon an idea: immigration. The importation of millions of Negroes and Asiatics, who would work for a far lower rate than the white working folk and would accept domestic conditions that they would no longer accept either.  

So fast forward sixty years. Millions of savages from the third world now live cheek by jowl with the indigenous population of Great Britain. Their barbarities are in the papers and televion news each and every day. 

Here's one simple example from today  :  

ARRESTS MADE IN BODY IN BOOT CASE

Police investigating the murder of a man found dead in the boot of a burnt-out car have made two arrests, they said.A 19-year-old woman and a 19-year-old man have been arrested on suspicion of murder and are currently in custody, Scotland Yard said. Officers on patrol came across a blue Mercedes on fire in Angerstein Lane, Blackheath, south east London, at 2am on Saturday, a Yard spokesman said. The fire brigade was called and put out the blaze, with the man's body discovered later. The victim has been named as Gagandip Singh, 21, from Bexleyheath. Next of kin have been informed.

Daily Express 27th Feb 2011 

Kurdish Honour killings, Albanian white slavery, Moslems operating pedophile white child prostitute rings, Islamic Genital Mutilation, African Witchcraft sacrifice, Russian Mafia drug running, the list of barbarities is endless.  

There are many who will tell you this was unforseen by the good but mislead politician of the past who didn't forsee the reprocussions of immigration, and wouldn't have followed the path they have had they known the outcome.  

Really? I think they knew PRECISELY what they were doing. 

And they still do.  

SECRET PLOT TO LET 50 MILLION AFRICAN WORKERS INTO EU

MORE than 50 million African workers are to be invited to Europe in a far-reaching secretive migration deal, the Daily Express can reveal today. A controversial taxpayer-funded “job centre” opened in Mali this week is just the first step towards promoting “free movement of people in Africa and the EU”. Brussels economists claim Britain and other EU states will “need” 56 million immigrant workers between them by 2050 to make up for the “demographic decline” due to falling birth rates and rising death rates across Europe.  The report, by the EU statistical agency Eurostat, warns that vast numbers of migrants could be needed to meet the shortfall in two years if Europe is to have a hope of funding the pension and health needs of its growing elderly population. It states: “Countries with low fertility rates could require a significant number of immigrants over the coming dec­ades if they want to maintain the existing number of people of working age.  “Having sufficient people of working age is vital for the economy and for tax revenue.”  The report, by French MEP Francoise Castex, calls for immigrants to be given legal rights and access to social welfare provision such as benefits.  Ms Castex said: “It is urgent that member states have a calm approach to immigration. To say ‘yes’, we need immigration … it is not a new development, we must accept it.”  The proposals include the creation of a “blue card” system, based on the American green card, that provides full working and welfare rights.

Daily Express 2008

 

David Cameron to offer India direct say on immigration policy

In a sign of what the prime minister will today describe as a new "spirit of humility" towards India, Downing Street is making it clear that Britain will consult Delhi over a proposed new cap on non-EU immigration.

Cameron's trip to India, which he will launch today with a speech to business leaders in the hi-tech centre of Bangalore, had threatened to be overshadowed by concerns in Delhi about the cap.Anand Sharma, the Indian commerce minister, told the prime minister in Downing Street recently that the cap could have an "adverse effect" on trade relations. Sharma pointedly remarked that Indian professionals, "who have made a notable contribution to the UK economy", could find it difficult to enter Britain. A Downing Street source said the prime minister was keen to offer reassurances to India. "We want to work with India and other countries to ensure that high-skilled people can still come to Britain," the source said. "We are going to talk to these countries about how to implement the cap."

 Guardian, 28th July 2010

Euro dying.

Do I trust Nigel Farage? No. Do I think he's the brains of the operation of UKIP, and is - whatever we think of him - a very good speaker? Damn right.

The EU is an Empire. Britain is a colony. The death of the Euro - debased paper currency of the Eurodream - could well be the death of the European Empire.

Cild Porn daycare worker Vanessa Gorge, only a symptom of the institutional, organized child rape.

NB LINKS IN GREEN

This has happened before, and will, until we change things, certainly again. Britain is riddled with those whose depravity knows no bounds, and there is always someone willing to supply whatever is wanted at a price.

There have been publicly well known cases - Kincora,Northern Ireland,  Islington, London, the Irish Republican Army, the Roman Catholic church, and recently Holly Grieg in Aberdeen  - where children have been supplied to senor and powerful public figures to sate their disgusting sexual depravities.

Here's the interesting questions: just WHO were these depraved animals producing and supplying child pornography FOR? Who placed this woman in the postition she held at the nursery? Why will she NOT identify the children? Why does the story focus on Blanchard and George? Who were the other three women?

Let's start here:

Members of the Plymouth Safeguarding Children Board, which carried out the review, found the inspection regime was a "tick box" exercise and called for the government to look at the way checks are carried out by the regulator.

The board also called for the government to examine the way community-based, privately-run nurseries like Little Ted's are run to make sure they are monitored properly and staff are well trained.

George had been guilty of "inappropriate behaviour" before she was caught, including showing members of staff adult pornography and boasting about her sexual exploits. Because she was a senior worker, other staff did not feel able to challenge her, the review found.

George, 40, from Plymouth, was jailed last year for abusing toddlers. Using her mobile phone, she photographed children in her care as she abused them and shared the images with her accomplice, Manchester businessmen Colin Blanchard.

Four women, including George, and Blanchard have been convicted of making and sharing images of abuse. Prosecutors said they were part of "one of the most sickening paedophile rings this country has seen".

(LINK) The Guardian (UK) 4th November 2010

So: how was this woman placed into this position? Who were the referees? Why was there no formal interviews held? Who sat on the board of trustees, who were the managers, who were responsible for the appointment and activities of this woman?

There are no records of the post being advertised, nor is there any evidence that references were taken up or that a formal interview took place.

It was a privately-run community nursery and new staff were often friends of managers or trustees. However, George did undergo a criminal records check and was found to be of good character.

Her fellow workers generally talk of George as a popular member of staff and – as one of the older workers – she quickly came to be seen as a figure of authority.

George's behaviour began to change from December 2008. The married mother-of-two was described from then on as "always seeming to be on the internet and chasing men".

Staff heard that George had offered a man sex for doing her car MOT and that she had sex on the moors for money. She also began to show images of adult pornography that were on her phone to other members of staff. Staff were embarrassed and worried – but did not take action.

Guardian (UK) 4th Nov. 2010

This woman was procurer of child pornography for others, for money, just as the local drug dealer sells dope. Blanchard was the middle man, not the Mr. Big, whose job it was to supply George with money, and receive the pornographic material.


The images and video procured by George, and handled by Blanchard wasn't for their own exclusive use. Who is the next person in the food chain, moving the pornography to those who want it?

It is suspected that Mrs George may have sent the images on a disk to Mr Blanchard, who emailed them to others.

Chf Supt Jim Webster, of Devon and Cornwall police, said: "We are taking the matter very seriously.

"It is difficult to identify exactly who is in the images at this stage.

"The starting point of the investigation was internet based. In an investigation of this nature there is often a chain of communication and passing on of images.

"We received information yesterday about the receipt of indecent images and searches are still on going. There is naturally great concern in the community. We will make sure parents and the wider community are kept informed."

Daily Telegraph, 10th June 2009

Really? So Blanchard paid for child pornography so he could just send the images to people in his address book  randomly? 

Blanchard is the key, he new the rats in the sewer and the rats in the positions of power: 

 Afterwards officers from the three forces involved in the investigation said Blanchard had been the “pivot” who linked George and Allen. He initiated the discussion of child abuse in conversations on Facebook and Microsoft Messenger by claiming to have been a victim himself. Police suspect that the three first made contact on one of the site’s many user groups before continuing their conversations via e-mail and text.

(Daily Mail) 3rd Oct 2009

The Powers That Be like regular sex with children, believe it or not, it's true. There are thousands of adults who were raped and abused by the powerful. They obtain their prey with middlemen and now women. These Powers have a great deal of money, and most common folk  are bought with trinkets and pennies. Just like Kincora, just like the Vatican,  just like Islington, just like the IRA, just like Hollie Greig. 

The Liberal Democrats could become "partner" of the Conservatives - one civil union too far?

Well well well.... they're already working out the result of the next election. If you voted Lib Dem, or Labour,  you may not want to read the following:

The conservatives are considering an informal pact with the LibDems under which they would urge people to make Nick Clegg's party their second choice at the next general election.

The historic pact, which could severely dent Labour's prospects of returning to power, would be proposed in the event of a Yes vote in next May's referendum on whether to replace the current first-past-the-post system with the alternative vote (AV).

Under the latter, people rank candidates in order of preference. The one who comes last drops out and second preferences are redistributed until one candidate wins more than 50 per cent of the votes cast.

In return, David Cameron would ask Mr Clegg to urge voters to make the Conservatives their second choice. Some Tory MPs are advocating such an agreement to keep Labour out of power. Although Liberal Democrat MPs are more cautious, they admit a pact would be a possibility if the Coalition proves successful. An unofficial pact is seen as more realistic than a more formal share-out of seats under which the Tories and Liberal Democrats did not stand against each other in some seats, including the 57 held by Mr Clegg's party.

A formal deal on seats has been suggested by Nick Boles, a Tory MP and prominent supporter of Mr Cameron's drive to modernise his party. But the Tory and Liberal Democrat leaderships admit that would provoke strong opposition from local party activists and have reassured them the two Coalition parties will both fight every seat at the next election.

Although Mr Cameron will urge voters to stick with the current system, there has been a growing recognition in Tory circles since the formation of the Coalition that a switch to AV could help the party's prospects. Ironically, Labour was the only party to back an AV referendum at this year's general election. Its pledge helped Mr Clegg persuade the Tories to allow a plebiscite as part of the Coalition agreement. Tory MP David Mowat, who had a majority of 1,553 over Labour in his Warrington South constituency in May, said: "If we did have AV and we put Lib Dems second and they put us second, it would be very likely to give us a better result than we might achieve under first-past-the-post. There could be a squeeze effect on Labour."

The down side for the LibDems is that such a voting pact could close the door to a Coalition deal with Labour if it emerged as the largest party after an election. One senior Liberal Democrat said: "This would be a win-win for the Tories. They are never going to form a Coalition Labour, but we might."

Liberal Democrats are confident that the AV referendum can be won even though the No campaign has been faster out of the starting blocks. They will try to make it a vote on the benefits of "coalition politics" rather than the Government's record. They believe the public like the idea of parties working together, even if they are worried about the spending cuts announced last month by George Osborne, the Chancellor.

Independent, 3rd Nov. 2010

It is worth remembering that the Powers That Be view us common folk as dumb cattle, stupid bovine cud-chewers, who roll out every few years and do what The Sun and the Daily mirror instructs us so to do. 

I would be sickened if I'd voted LD in the last election. The LD's are political whores, willing to deal with whoever can hand out a few baubles in return for their support.

Of course, I'm happy enough to see a change in the voting system, as they're always rigging the system to their own advantage anyway - the Boundary Commission is a prime example. Nothing changes, for they have all the prison cells and guns, so we have the system we've got and work within it.

It may just give smaller parties a bite out of the parliamentary cherry, such as the Greens and the BNP.

It may even implode the three main parties, which would be no loss, and a positive bonus, because we can force ideological and tactical difference from these shattered bodies - missing for thirty years. 

Scandal: Foreign Aid Budget is Twice as Much as British Higher Education Budget

Scandal: Foreign Aid Budget is Twice as Much as British Higher Education Budget

Evidence of the vicious anti-British nature of the Westminster parties has come with the “education budget cut” announced by the ConDem regime — which inadvertently revealed that the foreign aid budget is now twice as high as the higher education budget.

The shocking news was contained in the announcement by Chancellor George Osborne that the spending review cuts have meant that the higher education budget will be cut from £7.1 billion to £4.2 billion by 2014.

As bad as that news is, a quick look at the “ring fenced” foreign aid budget reveals that even prior to the recession, more money was being put aside for foreign aid than for higher education.

A “revised spending budget” issued by the Department for International Development (DFID) in June 2009 showed that the foreign aid budget for 2009/10 was £6.8 billion and was set to rise to £7.7 billion in the 2010/11 financial year.

The DFID announcement has deliberately understated the figures, hiding the true cost with an administrative trick. The figures they announced are only the direct aid programme, and not the total cost, which is called the “Gross Public Expenditure on Development” (GPEX) – which adds nearly £2 billion each year to total DFID expenditure.

For example, the GPEX in 2007/08 amounted to £6.027 billion, of which £5.2 billion was direct aid. The GPEX for 2006/07 was £7.4 billion, of which £4.9 billion was direct aid, and the GPEX for 2005/06 was £6.6 billion, of which £4.4 billion was direct aid.

NPI, 23rd Oct. 2010

Foreign Aid is the organized theft of the financial strength of white, British people and it's transference to third world regimes for social, political and sexual engineering games under the auspices of the United Nations.

And they're getting away with it. 

It is Communism, and most people are so saturated by food additives, fluoride in the toothpaste, TV and printed media and sport, the scum that operate tis fraud don't even bother to justify or hide it. They thing you are SHEEPLE, that you are stupid and easily frightened.

Appears that, generally, they're right.





  

Cameron loves the European Union, just like all good liberals.

Reposted with thanks, as I feel this man has found one of the very nubs of the problem of Britain and the EU : the Tories have swindled us into believing they are eurosceptic (which many members and a few MP's certainly are) whilst, in practicable political terms they - the leadership - are most certainly europhile.

DaveWatch: Cast-Iron Cameron's latest transparent ploy to kick Europe into the long grass

Gerald Warner (LINK to the blog post) 

How was it for you? Dave’s Churchillian moment – you know, his blood, sweat and tears offering this afternoon that promised Britain freedom from the domination of dark forces on the continent – did it reassure you? The latest pledges from Cast-Iron Cameron do not include a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty, of course, but what metropolitan sophisticate would take those sort of histrionics seriously?

No, we are entering exciting new territory in the great Conservative Euro-scam. There will be a referendum – wait for it! – on all future EU treaties. The chancers in Brussels, having got everything they wanted, have made it clear they will not be writing any more treaties for a long time, so this is just a tad academic.

An important point: a Cameron government will not try to claw back any serious powers within six months or a year of taking office. No, our salvation will be worked out “over a parliament”. That is a polite term for five years of procrastination, to kick the EU issue into the long grass. But Dave will be pressing for “repatriation” of powers over employment law, the charter of fundamental rights and criminal law.

Uh-huh? Correct me if I am wrong, but surely those “competences” are all deeply embedded in reams of small print within the Lisbon Treaty. So, to renegotiate them, Dave and William Hague would have to re-open the treaty. But we are told the treaty is so set in concrete it cannot be revised and that is why voters cannot have a referendum on it. If the British electorate cannot revisit it, how can Dave and William do so? Do they take us all for mugs (evident answer: yes)?

But soft! This is by no means the limit of Cast-Iron Dave’s munificence. Through the mechanism of a sovereignty Bill, he is going to give us a constitutional court to protect us from EU encroachment. Just 24 hours after we saw a grey-faced Vaclav Kraus tell the world that, thanks to the ruling of an EU-compliant constitutional court, the Czech Republic had ceased to exist as a sovereign nation, Dave is offering us a similar chocolate fireguard to defend our sovereignty. Gee, thanks, Dave. What can I say? (I mean, what can I say that would be printable?)

A constitutional court would be a charter for judicial activism such as we daily see sell out British rights and interests to asylum seekers, terrorists, EU bureaucrats, et al. As for renegotiating a few minor aspects of the Lisbon Treaty, why does Cameron imagine he will carry more clout if he goes into the negotiating chamber without the massive endorsement of the electorate in a referendum, which would set real alarm bells ringing in Brussels, rather than with such a mandate?

All this Tory Euroguff is no more than a device to persuade gullible voters to stay with Dave and his forsworn party. Whether you fall for it or not is a simple intelligence test. Presumably, too, these scrappy, mini-commitments are as “cast-iron” as his previous unconditional pledge of a referendum. Tory rhetoric has now shifted, desperately, to a platform of preserving the remaining sovereign powers that Britain possesses post-Lisbon. What powers would those be, Dave?

The EU is popular with all liberals (left and right) because it BYPASSES Parliament, Constitution, and Law. The comrades in the Labour Party under Kinnock got this in the mid eighties - all their wet dreams could be foisted onto Britain not by long drawn out debates in Westminster, by arguing at the elections, but by diktat from an unelected Commissioner-Dictator from the EU Commission. And the lunatic libertarian "free market" & "no borders" Libertarians realised it earlier - imagine MILLIONS of Poles, Romanians, Bulgarians, Slovaks, falling over themselves to live on a pittance, in overcrowded slums, filling the chicken slaughtering factories, laying the foundations of glass and concrete Cathedrals of Capitalism.....

The Tories will not save us from tyranny because they are part of it.

When the bullshit is all over....

We will need to re-establish some form of sanity in our monetary system. Here's an interesting piece, which yes, I know it's very "American" but the same arsepartery that has wrecked the US economy has happened here too:

Silver money for Americans
(silverseek.com)
By: Hugo Salinas Price

I think that my readers will agree that there is a desperate need for some fresh thinking about money in the U.S.

Many respected analysts worry that the expected action by the Fed to apply a new bout of QE after the coming elections is fraught with danger.

Fiat money in the US is in an advanced stage of decomposition and when money rots, the whole social, economic and political structure of the nation rots with it. A return to sound money is urgent. More and more people are aware of the perilous road ahead if nothing is done.

The problems facing the US are so gigantic in nature, that an all-round solution to them is impossible when analyzed in practical terms. A return to sound money is a return to gold and silver as currency. Gold is outstanding as money – but how to realize that goal? Silver is great for popular use – but again, how to regain it?

The only way open to regain a sound footing of real money for the US economy must be by establishing a process through which there will be a gradual and natural return to sound money. It is impossible to reform or improve the present monetary system of the US any other way.

The US abandoned sound money in a series of gradual steps; the first metal out of the monetary system was gold, in 1933; the second metal out of the system was silver, in 1965. The return to sound money would follow those steps, in inverse order: silver would return first, because silver has always been the money of the people; gold would return last, silver having opened the way.

Why did silver coinage disappear from circulation in America?  It disappeared because the dollar price of silver rose to a point, back in 1965, where the value of the silver in the silver coin was superior to the value of the coin itself. The result was that most silver coinage was melted down into bullion, which had a value greater than the monetary value of the melted coins. On October 20 a silver dime contained silver worth $1.72! (www.coinflation.com) Dollar inflation caused by expansion of the fiat money supply and expanding credit drove up the price of silver and thus drove silver coinage out of circulation.

The gradual return of silver money to circulation in America

In today’s world, a world where the Fed is probably going to print another huge amount of money out of nothing by “QE2”, explicitly in order to cause the American people to have inflationary expectations, is it possible to think of silver money returning to circulation in America?

The answer is “Yes”! But, it must be done by a new method. This new method will operate gradually by introducing silver money into circulation in parallel with the present monetary system of “fiat” paper bills and digital currency.

In recent years, others have attempted to restore silver money to the US economy. However, these well-meaning attempts have not been well thought out and have failed. You will recall that not long ago, Von Notthaus got into trouble with the Feds due to his misguided work.

Private attempts to restore silver to circulation as money must necessarily fail. Money is an extremely sensitive matter and only the cooperation of government can allow any reform to the monetary system.

The powers that be in the US Government must recognize at some point that it is indispensable to the health and continuing existence of the US as we have known it, to restore silver coin into circulation. At present, its policy is to ignore public discontent; the results of the coming elections will probably do little to change its policy. The discontent of the American people will increase until the government hears the rumble of distant drums. Perhaps then, it will be willing to turn to silver, to appease the population.

Silver money can indeed be restored to circulation in the US, but it must be by a new method. Anything new in monetary affairs must always be suspect and must face an initial opposition. However, we are forced to resort to a new method because the conditions are new: inflation of the money supply and unlimited expansion of credit are new conditions which silver coinage, as it has been created for centuries, has never before faced.

A new method for monetizing silver

Silver went out of circulation because the monetary value of silver coins was engraved upon them. When the market price of silver rose, and the value engraved upon the coins was left behind and below the value of the silver in the coins, the coins became more valuable as bullion than as coins. The coins were melted down. The silver coinage disappeared.

This gives us the clue to restoring silver into circulation: eliminate the engraved value.

In this case, what would be the monetary value of a silver coin with no engraved value?

The answer is that – like a stock – its value would be a quoted value; however, unlike a stock, the quote would not be a market quote but a quote coming from the Treasury.

The legal tender monetary value of the silver coin quoted by the Treasury would take the place of an engraved value. This monetary value would be increased to meet rises in the price of silver, but remain stable at its last quote, during falls in the price of silver.

Stocks prices fluctuate, but the monetary value of a silver coin cannot be allowed to fluctuate, because money must have a stable value. A silver coin, whose quoted monetary value goes up and down, remains a commodity. It cannot be used as money. The Treasury must issue a stable quote for the monetary value of the silver coin with no engraved value.

This Treasury quote of the monetary value of this silver coin must always be superior, albeit by a small amount, to the market price of the silver contained in the silver coin. The difference between the market price of the silver in the coin, and the monetary quote issued by the Treasury, would result in a small profit for the Treasury, classically called “seigniorage”. Since the quoted monetary value of the silver coins would be slightly higher than the value of the silver contained in the coins, there would be no profit in melting them down. They would remain in circulation permanently.

We have ruined our economy with credit. The reason for this is the easy ability to create paper money, or today a new row of zeros on a hard drive. This is fine for the high flying and powerful, but -look around yourself - for the average bloke or gal on the street. 

Mass personal credit was impossible until the silver was removed from our coinage. In 1919, one shilling was 90/100ths silver, reduced in 1920 to 50/100ths, and even then, because silver cannot be "made", there was still not enough in circulation to have Credit Cards, personal loans and buy now pay in three years for the toiling masses.

For the same reason, welfare and general spending was controlled -  there was a NATIONAL INSURANCE FUND for example, wherein only what was paid in could be paid out (the failure of the fund was in it's organization, not a "fund" as an idea).

There was little inflation - and what there was was gentle, and often temporary - the price of silver and gold being a fixed amount. A shilling in 1750 bought more or less the same amount of goods - or more - in 1900.

The last sixty years have been a purposefully created fantasy, wherein the great mass of people were blinded and entranced with easy credit and toys. When the dust finally settles, we will have to rebuild our system of life, to return it to sanity. Paper money (and it's electronic equivalent cannot be trusted.

 

Stable coinage disbars governments from borrowing and then repaying debt by printing bank notes and enslaving the the people to the Rothschilds and friends for schemes and dreams of whatever gang of cranks oddballs and freaks control the Exchequer.

Stable money is vital to enable saving towards the bad times and toward retirement & old age. Allowing inflation is theft from the working people. 

These sites may be a bit of an eyeopener, have a play and read....


This will allow you to see the collapse in the value of your money:
http://www.measuringworth.com/ukcompare/

Inflation figures from 1270 - 2009 for the UK,  the lunacy of the modern era starts in 1914 when gold was removed from circulation, never to come back  :
http://www.measuringworth.com/inflation/