Norway killings being used to push Multicultural policy of the Frankfurt School's Culturalist Marxists.

D'oh! The Cops in Norway knew the killers name BEFORE his arrest:

Despite being portrayed by the media as inept due to the length of time it took them to reach the island of Utoeya, it has now emerged that police knew the name of gunman Anders Behring Breivik before they even arrested him, a startling admission that prompted one of Britain’s top news anchors to question how authorities were aware of the gunman’s identity in advance.
During his Channel 4 News broadcast on Friday evening, host Jon Snow asked “why police knew the killer’s name by the time they had arrived on the island,” reported the Telegraph live blog.
“He surrendered the moment police called his name 3 minutes after they arrived. What we don’t know is how the police knew the terrorist’s name before they arrested him,” said Snow, who is recognized as one of Britain’s most trusted news anchors, and cannot be dismissed as a “conspiracy theorist”.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/police-knew-gunmans-name-before-arrest.html

They haven't been able to make Multiculturalism work spontaneously, in the Western nations, so now these terrible State organised and controlled actions in Norway are going to be the lynch-pin to forcing acceptance of Multiculturalism, with the fear of being seen as a "Terrorist", "Nazi" or potential murderer. 
This whole conspiracy is to switch the fear rhetoric of the tyrannous scum who operate Western governments, from Islamic terrorism (tired, wearing thin) , to "Homegrown" terrorism (the terrorists are everywhere, you can't identify them etc). ID cards, more CCTV, longer holding by the Police without charge blah blah blah ..... The Sky News reports that the Police (front men for MI5) are already attacking legitimate political organisations in the UK: 

Scotland Yard's counter terrorism chief, assistant commissioner Cressida Dick, has been requested to supply specialist officers to join a new European task force dedicated to investigating European-wide far right links to a bomb attack in Oslo and a shooting spree on Utoya Island.
http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/World-News/Norway-Metropolitan-Police-To-Join-European-Wide-Force-Probing-Far-Right-Links-Of-Attacks-Suspect/Article/201107416036718?f=rss

His handlers in MOSSAD/CIA/MI6 couldn't even be bothered to create a "new" backstory for this patsy.

The 32 year-old appears to have quoted verbatim large sections from the preaching of Theodore Kaczynski in his 1500 page online rant.Breivik had “copied and pasted” almost a dozen key passages from the 69 year-old’s 35,000 manifesto, only changing particular words such as “leftist” with “cultural Marxist”.It remains unclear what his motivations were, but experts said it appeared he had taken “inspiration” from Kaczynski whose two decade parcel-bomb terror campaign killed three people and 29 injured others.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/norway/8658269/Norway-shooting-Anders-Behring-Breivik-plagiarised-Unabomber.html

They just rehashed someone else's ramblings. 

The whole story stinks: 

Given the fact that the establishment media got it spectacularly wrong by instantly jumping to the conclusion that Friday’s deadly attack in Norway was the work of Al-Qaeda Muslims, placing complete trust in the details emerging about gunman Anders Behring Breivik would be foolish, especially since there are innumerable inconsistencies and contradictions that need to be studied before a fuller picture of what motivated the bloodshed can be established.
The rush to blame Muslims for the carnage, hastily parroted by an onslaught of mainstream “terror experts,” was a startling insight into how the propaganda that fuels the war on terror is so unquestionably bounced around the echo chamber of the corporate media.
It’s also a reminder that the mainstream press instantly falls in line with whoever the establishment designates the enemy du jour to be at any given time. Now that Muslims have been so vehemently demonized as terrorists, it’s the turn of so called “right-wing extremists,” or anyone who disagrees with mass immigration, loss of sovereignty and globalist financial looting, to feel the heat.
The effort to smear European conservatives as unhinged radicals who harbor simmering urges for bloodlust is now in full swing, and it’s a demonization campaign firmly founded on the carefully crafted public portrayal of Anders Behring Breivik.

However, it’s quickly becoming apparent that just as many eyewitnesses reported two gunmen on the island where the rampage unfolded, there are two different personas behind Breivik himself.
Indeed, there are two different Facebook profiles for Breivik, one from before the massacre and one from after. The latter profile appears to have been embellished and deliberately altered to emphasize the notion that the gunman was motivated by his “Christian conservative” beliefs.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/anders-behring-breivik-manufacturing-a-patsy.html

Press TV, mouthpiece of the Islamic Theocracy of Iran, which really is a rather nasty vicious little State run by theological psychopaths, , is cock-a-hoop: 

Islam, and their useful white European idiots (such as this "Peter Ruston/ Chris Bamberry pairing in the video above)  are now empowered by the Elites to scream Hate, and Terrorist, at any disagreement with Islamic theological stances, and with attempting to turn the savage barbarian tide away from European shores. 
White people of Europe are in real trouble, worse than they have EVER been. rememberer: these hate ridden bastards - useful idiots of the Western oligarchies, are the true face of Islam. People in Europe aren't frightened of Islamics and Islam for reasons of terrorism,but because of the murder and mayhem prevalent in whatever society Islam gains control of. They need to go from Europe by choice or force. They do not belong here, any more than white folk belong in Iran, Saudi Arabia or Syria. 

Anyhow: these are interesting alternative media takes on the situation of the shooter and Norway:  : 

http://classicalvalues.com/2011/07/not-civilians-but-traitors-to-be-executed/

http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2011/07/25/knights-templar-honesty-and-hypocrisy/

http://thebuckshotter.blogspot.com/2011/07/oslo-bomber-is-freemason-and-zionist.html

Crime not linked to recession. Bollocks.

Democracy is the great love of the failures and cowards of life. 

[R.J. Rushdoony, Thy Kingdom Come, 1978]

* * *

Brokenshire: 'There is no link between crime and the economy'

Minister for Crime and Security James Brokenshire says Britain's economic woes have not caused an increase in crime, despite a sharp rise in the number of UK burglaries, according to the British Crime Survey (BCS).

The survey of 45,000 households indicated that burglaries in England and Wales increased by 14 per cent in 2010-11 compared with the previous year.

The figures also showed a 6 per cent increase in violent crime with a sharp rises in domestic violence and assaults with minor injuries.

Minister for Crime and Security James Brokenshire denied there was a a rise "in recession-led crime" and argued the figures were not statistically significant.

Daily Telegraph, 14th July 2011

Only a politician can speak of a 14% rise in burglary, or a 6% rise in violent crime is "statistically insignificant".

The political class of Great Britain, like those of all Western nations,  have become completely dislocated from the real world. The exist in a bubble, of wealth, power and security.

Their incomes, their work, their life experiences are unlike 90% of the population.


Their children are never abused and sold as child prostitutes by Moslem child molesters.
Their wives are not gang raped by Somalian "asylum seekers" or refugees.
They are not murdered in their front garden by a gang of savages.
Their possessions are not stolen by junkie scum.  
They do not have to struggle with burglars inside their home. 
They do not watch their garden and home wrecked by vandals. 

Their income is guaranteed for their term of election, and most are reelected time after time - look at Tony Benn, Dennis Skinner, Ted Heath as examples: the vast majority sit for seats which rarely change allegiance, so thy are safe. Only a tiny minority of seats are swing seats, and an MP will move like lightening to a safe seat at the first opportunity. When they do retire they are kept in the lap of luxury with a gold plated, copper bottom, feather-bedded, taxpayer funded pension for life.

Crime isn't really bad. Unemployment is falling. We're doing something about immigration.  All these kinds of statements are the same sort of reassuring words you use to a child when thy ask difficult questions, but you can't ignore them.

They nod sagely and agree there are too many immigrants entering Britain, unemployment is terrible, housing is in short supply - whilst opening us to Syrian, Romanian,  Nigerian, Bulgarian, Liberian, Albanian, Egyptian, Ghanaian, Turkish, Botswanan, Iraqi, Iranian, Libyan, Afghani, Chinese, Kurdish, and South American immigration.

"We'll be tough on crime" they'll promise, whilst Ken Clarke MP, the whatever job title he is in the government  plans and plots to close prison places and flood the streets with criminals.

THEY NEVER SUFFER THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR ACTIONS. THEY ARE OF A SELECT CLASS, THE SERVANTS OF THE ELITE POWERS OF THE PLANET, THE ROTHSCHILD CLAN IN THE CITY OF LONDON, THE JESUITS IN THE VATICAN, AND THE JEWS IN WASHINGTON DC.

But their reassurances - they're not working any longer.

And as the political class becomes more distant from the people, only one of two things can be the conclusion: tyranny or revolution.  Presently the tyranny is building. Elections no longer matter, as the three parties in the UK which are in reality the governing class - Lib, Lab, Con - have philosophically merged, and now the discussion centres around the differing means to the predetermined end, rather than what the end is (death of ideological difference).

There is an implicit admission that things are unravelling. We already see that the multiculturalism and equalitarian dreams of the sixties have failed to come to fruition by voluntary choice, creating a colour blind, gender neutral socialist and co-operative commonwealth in Britain.

We have to have repressive laws because the people have failed to accept the wisdom offered by our ruling elite: including long prison sentences for those who will not comply by either by accepting the paradigm of a coffee coloured world or just keeping their mouths shut.

We are now fined for a thousand and one things which would, thirty years ago have been totally unacceptable by the mass of people. New regulations and laws are created by the ream each and every month, thousands of them, that we virtually "break the law" just by leaving the house. These of course, under real, Anglo Saxon Common Law, are nothing, unreal, and worthless. There is now power to just fine people without a trial (Magna Carta), but the government owns all the guns, all the police, all the courts and all the prisons, so are able to simply tax people to the nhilt (which is what these spurious fines really are - indirect  taxes).

Of course, while the police and other bodies are fining you for leaving your car parked more than 12" from the kerb, or leaving a trash bag by your wheelie bin on bin day, or some other non crime, REAL CRIMINALS, who REALLY break the REAL law, keep up their wickedness: drug dealers deal, rapists rape, murderers play X Box games in hotel style "prisons", Child Molesters are "understood" by health care professionals, and fraudsters are given community service hours. 

 * * * * 

St. Paul, in reminding the Corinthian Christians of their destiny, said, Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world? (I Cor. 6:2). Moffatt renders this, Do you not know that the saints are to manage the world?, a meaning we do not need to remind ourselves of. Church government is a prelude to world government, not by the church but by the saints. In trying to establish the necessary church government towards this end, Paul's constant appeal was, not to the form of church government or to the members, but to the law of God and the growth of the saints in terms of it (I Cor. 6:15-9:27). ....Judging, governing, or managing of the world is in terms of God's law. Because the saints were called to manage or govern the world, very quickly it became their purpose to move into positions of authority and power. 

[R.J. Rushdoony, The Institutes of Biblical Law (Nutley, NJ: Craig Press, 1973), pp. 773,742]

Great Britain is disappearing up it's own are.

Along with most other White, western nations Great Britain is slowly (and soon to be rapidly) disappearing up it's own arse, socially, legally and financially. So it's good to know that our politicians at the local level have got their priorities right:

A campaign has been launched to outlaw smoking in all public places in Stony Stratford near Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire.
If passed, the new bylaw would mean anyone caught lighting up in the historic market town would face a fine.
Senior politicians on the town’s council have indicated their support for the scheme, which comes after the mayor of New York banned smoking from parks and beaches in the US city last month.
The town’s council will discuss the concept next month before Milton Keynes Council is likely to be asked to use its powers to introduce the ban.
Stony Stratford Councillor Paul Bartlett, who is leading the campaign, said: "When you walk through the high street in any town, smoke is in your face and harming you and any children there.
"Smokers then get their butt, which is full of saliva, and chuck it on the floor. It costs millions to clear street rubbish.”
The ban, which would be the first of its kind in the country, would be enforced by Police Community Support Officers, traffic wardens and members of the public.
Cllr Robert Gifford, chairman of town’s council, described the ban as "appealing".
"A result of the smoking ban is that smokers now go outside and drop their cigarette butts all over the streets," he said.
"In principle the idea of a street smoking ban is appealing, but there may be other solutions to the problem of second hand smoke and litter."
The idea has received mixed reactions, with some smokers in the area complaining that fining people for lighting up outdoors is excessive.
Anne Gregory, 56, a smoker from Stony Stratford, said: "I agree that it's disgusting when cigarette butts get thrown on the floor but it would be nice to see more bins around instead.
"A smoking ban is taking it too far. Saying there is a risk of passive smoking when you're walking down the street is ridiculous.
"Nobody likes a smoker in your face but it's no bother if you're outside."
Amanda Sandford, spokeswoman for Action on Smoking and Health, said the move in Stony Stratford would make it the first place in Britain to impose a total ban on smoking in public.
She said: "Passive smoking is very unpleasant and we are already seeing the health benefits of the indoors ban with a fall in heart and lung disease.
"An unintended consequence of the indoor smoking ban is that more smokers are on the streets dropping litter and this ban would prevent that.
"We have heard of councils banning smoking on play parks and beaches but this would be the first blanket ban on smoking in Britain."

The Daily Telegraph, 29th June 2011 

Denis McShane, MP and cheerleader for Europe, Israel and Blair, investgated by the Police.

I hate and despise Denis McShane MP, for no better reason than he represents in political terms everything socially, morally, philosophically rotten about Britain.  Not for his political affiliation - they're all operating for the same global Boss, but because, in libe with every other piece of trash that infects the House of Commons, who have spent their time in political activity selling us to whatever gang of political psychopaths they deem suitable to their taste.

Who he, you ask?

Denis MacShane (born 21 May 1948) is a British Labour politician, who has been the Member of Parliament for Rotherham since the 1994 by-election, and served as the Minister of State for Europe from 2002 until 2005, as well as being a current Policy Council member for Labour Friends of Israel.

In 2005 he became a signatory of the Henry Jackson Society principles, advocating a proactive approach to the spread of liberal democracy across the world, including by military intervention. The society also supports "European military modernisation and integration under British leadership". In 2003 he criticised the Muslim community, saying they did not do enough to condemn acts of Islamic terrorism. He was a supporter of the 2003 invasion of Iraq and has strongly supported Tony Blair's foreign policy in relation to the Middle East, and elsewhere.

^Wikipedia.

^{Repusive little reptile.}

BNP Complaint Leads to Denis McShane’s Suspension

Fri, 15/10/2010 - 12:59 |  BNP News

A complaint submitted by British National Party activist Michael Barnbrook to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards has resulted in yet another Labour Party MP, Denis McShane, being placed under police investigation and suspended from his party.

Mr Barnbook, a former Metropolitan Police inspector, lodged his complaint with Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards John Lyon in June 2009, citing a number of examples of where Mr McShane had “breached the rules of the House” with regard to expenses.

In his letter, Mr Barnbrook pointed out that Mr Macshane used his office expenses to claim more than £5,900 for 8 machines between March, 2005 and January 2008.

“The computers, which cost between £498 and £1276 each, are in addition to technical equipment provided to MPs by Parliamentary authorities,” Mr Barnbrook continued.

Furthermore, Mr Barnbrook pointed out, the public records showed duplicate claims “in successive months for a computer of the same value, £498” and “more than £8,000 for translation services.”

Mr McShane also submitted more than a dozen invoices to the Commons fees office bearing the heading of the European Policy Institute. Each bill was justified by one line - ‘research and translation’ - followed by a demand for fees ranging between £550 and £950.

The European Policy Institute is controlled by Mr Macshane’s brother, Edmund Matyj Aszek.

“Finally, Mr Macshane has claimed expenses of nearly £20,000 a year for seven years in order to run his official constituency office from a shabby looking garage at his home address,” Mr Barnbrook added.

Mr Lyon then replied, asking for further details of the claims. Mr Barnbrook duly provided chapter and verse of the claims which he found logged on the ‘allowances by Members’ part of the Parliament website.

On 15 July last year, Mr Lyon wrote back to Mr Barnbrook and informed him that he was going to proceed with the investigation over the expenses claims, but not over the use of the “shabby garage” as a constituency office.

Mr McShane’s suspension will remain in place "until the question of possible criminal proceedings has been resolved,” said an official statement by Mr Lyon’s office.

Scotland Yard confirmed it is considering the complaint along with "a small number" of other outstanding expenses-related allegations.

McShane is unhappy that the tap of expenses has been shut off. 

He has previously strongly denied any wrongdoing. He has been one of the most high-profile critics of the new expenses system. 

Telegraph 14th October 2010

Further?

Independent

Telegraph

Food inflation is the harbinger of the future. It's going to be worse than most can imagine.

Comment.

They have really screwed us.

They?

Not the Moslems, they're just a nasty symptom of our present precarious state, like pissing razor blades when you have Syphilis.

"They" are the greasy scum, the lick-spittles and lackeys of the Rothschild  collective and their friends in the City of London. They are at this present time pillaging the very last few assets from the UK before it's Goodnight Vienna for the British people.

The British economy will not recover. There is nothing to recover.

Keynesian will not help us: there are no factories, workshops and production facilities to revitalise. There are no coal mines, no fishing fleet, no clothing workers desperate to see the warehouses emptied by horny handed sons of toil, ready to fill again with the produce of their labours.

Our former public industries, the utilities especially, are owned not by either the scientific technocracy Whitehall or the half-arsed bumbling local council, as in years gone by, but by faceless globalistic corporations, who rightly perceive Britain as a savage barbarian views a woman - fit to raped.

And it's all a real honest  and true conspiracy (click for PDF download ), carried to fruition.

The jump, from 1.7 per cent in June, is likely if global food commodity prices continue to rise, said Simon Ward, chief economist at Henderson.

Rising food costs could have the effect of pushing up the consumer prices index (CPI), the official measure of inflation, to 4 per cent – double the Bank of England's 2 per cent target, warned Mr Ward. 

The impact on household budgets could even persuade the Coalition to cancel its planned rise in VAT, he added.

"Such an increase [in food prices] would hit consumer spending and recovery prospects and could destabilise inflationary expectations," said Mr Ward.

"This could warrant postponing or cancelling the coming VAT hike."

The Food and Agriculture Organisation food index, which measures prices of meat, dairy products, cereals, oils and fats, and sugar on a monthly basis, rose by an annual 22 per cent in August, the fastest rate since September 2008.

Food prices have increased further in September, Mr Ward said.

According to the British Retail Consortium, wheat prices alone have risen by 60 per cent over the past 12 months following crop failures in Russia and its subsequent ban on exports.

That has had a direct impact on the prices of foods containing wheat, but also on the cost of animal feed which in turn is pushing up meat prices.

Simon Hayes, an economist at Barclays Capital, said that rising food prices were a reminder that Britain's "inflation problem has not gone away".

He forecast that official figures to be released on Tuesday would show that the CPI rose to 3.2 per cent in August, from 3.1 per cent in July. 

11th September 2010 Telegraph (UK)

NB: 
Are all Jews part of a global network conspiring to destroy the world? 
No. 
Are there a tightly knit gang of Zionist communists controlling the financial system to their own benefit, using their collective religious affiliation, supported by whole host of useful idiots, such as other Jews, Christian Zionists, socialists, liberals,  and other foolish types? 
Yes.
But surely they couldn't do it on their own, could they? Right : the same forces behind finance are behind the Vatican, UN, EU, World Bank, Communism, Fascism.... the Synagogue of Satan (click the word link ---> link)...

These are troubled times for the Coalition, but worse is to come - Telegraph

From the Telegraph ( UK)

David Cameron intended this week to be a demonstration of politics as it should be, ministers and MPs carrying out the people's business by debating serious issues. The Commons was made to return for a September sitting, to show its usefulness and prepare the ground for the difficult times ahead. The Coalition would display unity of purpose by promoting its constitutional reforms, before heading for the all-important round of party conferences.

Instead, the Prime Minister is momentarily out of action, called away by the sudden death of his father, Ian, in France yesterday. His absence extends the paternity leave that was due to finish this week, and forced him to miss the first Prime Minister's Questions of the new session. Just when he should be re-emerging from an extended summer break to lead his Government, he is weighed down by bereavement for the "huge hero figure" he adored.

Family must come first, as it always has done for the Prime Minister. But his presence is urgently needed by his party, to draw a line under a period of damaging media coverage that has left two of his most valued advisers compromised. There was compassion on display in the Commons yesterday, but this remains a difficult time for the Coalition.

William Hague's judgment has been called into question by the appointment and subsequent resignation of his special adviser, Christopher Myers. The Foreign Secretary's statement denying the lurid rumours surrounding their relationship, and revealing the fertility difficulties he and his wife Ffion have suffered, earned him a mixture of sympathy and head-shaking from Conservative MPs. Most are baffled by his behaviour, while many fear that a Cabinet big beast has reduced himself to lame duck status at a time when his instinctive connection with the Tory party, and in particular voters in the North, makes him a vital member of the Coalition. No one questions the truthfulness of his account, but the Westminster market place is an unforgiving one, and his price has been markedly discounted. Mr Hague must use the party conference in Birmingham to remind us that he still has fight in his heart.

For Andy Coulson the damage is less obvious, but no less threatening. He does not appear to be in any legal danger from the renewed interest in theNews of the World bugging affair. The Metropolitan Police shows no desire to be dragged into another politicised investigation, and no one has yet produced evidence against him that looks strong enough to satisfy a court. But Labour are running an effective mud-slinging operation which has so far produced a police pledge to interview Mr Coulson about the latest claims, a new inquiry by the Home Affairs Select Committee, and an offer from the Speaker of a Commons debate today on the allegations that under Mr Coulson's editorship the News of the World intercepted the telephone messages of politicians and celebrities. Not bad going for a party that is supposed to be recovering from a brutal defeat.

As a result, the issue is in the headlines, and so far no amount of No 10 news engineering – including ordering the release of details of HM Revenue & Customs' mishandling of tax records – has provided sufficient distraction. Nick Clegg, standing in for the Prime Minister in the Commons yesterday, delivered a useful reminder of Labour's own inglorious relationship with the Murdoch empire by pointing out that the first person to call and offer sympathy when Mr Coulson resigned as editor at the height of the scandal was Gordon Brown. The then chancellor assured Mr Coulson that he had done the honourable thing and "would go on to do a worthwhile job". Mr Cameron can ill afford to have the man in charge of organising the Government's message appearing on the ten o'clock news night after night, with cameramen on his doorstep. At some point, resisting such attention is no longer worthwhile.

Yet all this turbulence is nothing compared with what will hit the Coalition next month when George Osborne unveils his Comprehensive Spending Review (CSR) – at that point, all hell will break loose. "We are in a canoe paddling down the Zambezi, and Victoria Falls lie dead ahead. Once we've gone over the edge, none of this will matter," one leading Cameroon told me. The edge, for those at Westminster who worry about it, is the moment we discover just how bad the cuts are going to be. To judge by what Cabinet ministers and officials are saying, many worry that the Coalition has not done nearly enough to warn the public of the abyss into which the country is about to plunge. "If we have had a collective failure," one Cabinet minister says, "it is that we have underplayed the scale of the problem."

The review itself is proceeding to the Chancellor's satisfaction. He describes it as "a funnel" – a decision-making process that gradually filters a giant mass of information and numbers down to some conclusions. Some major departments are about to settle their budgets, and there is so far no sign of incipient panic or a last-minute, Gordon Brown-style scramble.

What is little understood about the spending review is that it will decide significant political issues which by themselves would normally deserve weeks or months of scrutiny and debate. Consider that in addition to the task of deciding final numbers, department by department, for a parliament's worth of spending, the CSR must also make policy decisions about how to fund higher education, how to reform benefits, how to shape the future of Britain's defence. Alone, these are each explosive issues that could bring down a government. To seek to resolve them in one great political moment is ambition on an impressive scale.

From inside the machine, the tone is optimistic: health is settled, education is safe, the two sticking points of defence and welfare reform are close to being resolved. Outsiders are not so sure: they say the NHS is being pushed into an unnecessary turmoil of reform, that education changes have been too timid so far, that welfare cannot be usefully reformed without attacking universal benefits, and that defence cuts are about to relegate us to onlooker status on the world stage.

The other consideration is the level of detail that can be expected from the CSR. Those wanting every cut to be spelled out down to the last by-pass and job centre will be disappointed. While each department will have its budget settled, and its priorities set, there will be months of further difficult decisions to come. Ministers mutter darkly about what 40 per cent cuts will mean. They worry that the voters and even MPs have yet to grasp what the public sector landscape will look like.

How Coalition MPs will cope when they are caught between cuts and constituents is unknown. Whips fear that the new Tory intake in particular is marked by an independent streak. They learned on the campaign trail the trick of their new Lib Dem partners to be local champions dedicated to protecting local services. The Treasury is more optimistic that backbench independence will not translate into nimbyism. "People realise that we were elected on a platform to tackle the deficit and it would look odd if we shied away now," one source says.

So things look unexpectedly tough for the Conservative leadership this week. The political narrative is running against them. But they shouldn't fret too much. It is going to get far, far worse.

These are troubled times for the Coalition, but worse is to come - Telegraph