Timing, old boy, timing: ruined careers, missing Prime Ministers, death of a journalist.

Since we are to have a Judicial Inquiry into the wicked Press, shouldn’t we also have one into wicked politicians? 

Journalists can be nasty, and newspapers beastly, but their misdeeds are as nothing set beside those of governments.

Governments also hack into phones, poke their noses into our personal affairs and misuse the information they obtain.

Peter Hitchens, the Daily Mail, 17th July 2011. Daily Mail, 17th July 2011.

There is a war going on internally, with the elites of the world. It is not our war, except in the sense that it is happening in public, so we perceive it. 
The Elite of the world are not a monolithic group either in membership or methodology: they are divided at times not on ends but means and strategy, and occasionally, like through a glass darkly, we are allowed a fleeting view. 
However whatever the punch line of this fracas, there will be no good in it for NO-ONE other than THEM. Both sides are commited to the same outcome, which will mean more death, mayhem rape and pillage for US ALL. 
For the UK, this is a battle between the "liberal" and "conservative" faction for control. The Labour Party, Guardian  and  BBC is ranged against the Tories and News International. 
That;'s certainly how it appars. 
But there is something deeper: 
WHERE ARE MURDOCH's friends in all of this. NO-ONE is speaking for News International or Murdoch. And yet Murdoch is a Papal Knight and one of the most openly commited ZIONISTS within Western media circles. Where are for example the US neocons, whom Murdoch did so much for over 20 years? Where are the Jesuits, ot the spokesmen of the Vatican? Where are his Jewish Zionist neocon buddies in the NY media set?

'Someone's coming to get me': Terrified phone-hacking whistleblower feared for his life before he was found dead

• http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2016132/Sean-Hoare-dead-News-World-phone-hacking-whistleblower-feared-life.html#ixzz1SZbuozrY

  
  

  Sean Hoare found dead at his flat in Watford, Herts

• Ex NotW reporter's claims last autumn reignited scandal

• Mr Hoare claimed Coulson's denials of phone hacking were 'a lie'

• Police probing former showbiz reporter's 'suicide'

• Friends suggest he may have died of natural causes

• Post mortem being carried out this morning

The pins are really beginning to fall. A dead Journalist, senior policemen have gone, and now the politicians are going directly into the spotlight. 

Times of India: 19th July 2011

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/uk/Hacking-row-may-singe-Cameron/articleshow/9278259.cms

LONDON: The News of the World crisis turned severe after UK's top police officer and one of his deputies resigned following allegations of taking favours from an ex-editor of the publication. Stephenson, London's metropolitan police commissioner at Scotland Yard, took responsibility for his force appointing Neil Wallis, a former deputy editor of News of the World, as a public relations adviser. 

Pointing a finger at Cameron, Stephenson suggested the PM risked being "compromised" by his proximity to former NOTW editor and Cameron's media director until January, Andy Coulson. "Once Neil Wallis's name did become associated (with hacking scandal), I did not want to compromise the PM in any way by revealing or discussing a potential suspect who clearly had a close relationship with Coulson," said Stephenson. Coulson is currently on bail. 

Where's Cameron? Skulking abroad in South Africa: 

The Metro: 19th July 2011

http://www.metro.co.uk/news/869711-david-cameron-survival-odds-plummet-after-calls-for-pm-to-quit

The odds on the prime minister leaving office plummeted after he came under fire for leaving for the trip on Sunday night and for his links to News International.

Mr Cameron is today due to return early from the planned four-day visit to Africa, and faces an emergency extra session in the House of Commons tomorrow.

Labour frontbencher Yvette Cooper said it looked like ‘one rule for the police and one for the prime minister’ – a reference to Sunday’s resignation of Met boss Sir Paul Stephenson over the scandal.

Sir Paul had aimed a barb at Mr Cameron’s ties to shamed former News of the World editor Andy Coulson, who was employed as the prime minister’s head of communications in Downing Street.

Labour backbenchers Dennis Skinner and Sir Gerald Kaufman called for the prime minister to quit. ‘When is dodgy Dave going to do the decent thing and resign?’ Mr Skinner asked.

Labour leader Ed Miliband refused to call for Mr Cameron’s head. It was, however, time for the prime minister to ‘apologise’ for employing Mr Coulson, he said. Deputy prime minister Nick Clegg said Mr Cameron should ‘absolutely not’ resign.

He added: ‘Let’s keep some perspective. The fear that people have is that a criminal investigation could be jeopardised by the contact between the police and media.’

Downing Street said the Africa trip was beneficial in drumming up British business opportunities. And Mr Cameron insisted he was taking ‘all appropriate action’, such as setting up a judicial inquiry into the hacking scandal.

‘I have been out there in parliament and in press conferences, fully answering the questions, fully transparent, very clear about what needs to be done,’ he added.

MPs will today quiz News Corporation chief Rupert Murdoch, his son, James – chairman of News International – and NI’s former chief executive Rebekah Brooks over phone-hacking and police corruption allegations.

Bookmaker Ladbrokes yesterday slashed the odds on Mr Cameron leaving office from 100/1 to 8/1.

 

The Liberal Democrats could become "partner" of the Conservatives - one civil union too far?

Well well well.... they're already working out the result of the next election. If you voted Lib Dem, or Labour,  you may not want to read the following:

The conservatives are considering an informal pact with the LibDems under which they would urge people to make Nick Clegg's party their second choice at the next general election.

The historic pact, which could severely dent Labour's prospects of returning to power, would be proposed in the event of a Yes vote in next May's referendum on whether to replace the current first-past-the-post system with the alternative vote (AV).

Under the latter, people rank candidates in order of preference. The one who comes last drops out and second preferences are redistributed until one candidate wins more than 50 per cent of the votes cast.

In return, David Cameron would ask Mr Clegg to urge voters to make the Conservatives their second choice. Some Tory MPs are advocating such an agreement to keep Labour out of power. Although Liberal Democrat MPs are more cautious, they admit a pact would be a possibility if the Coalition proves successful. An unofficial pact is seen as more realistic than a more formal share-out of seats under which the Tories and Liberal Democrats did not stand against each other in some seats, including the 57 held by Mr Clegg's party.

A formal deal on seats has been suggested by Nick Boles, a Tory MP and prominent supporter of Mr Cameron's drive to modernise his party. But the Tory and Liberal Democrat leaderships admit that would provoke strong opposition from local party activists and have reassured them the two Coalition parties will both fight every seat at the next election.

Although Mr Cameron will urge voters to stick with the current system, there has been a growing recognition in Tory circles since the formation of the Coalition that a switch to AV could help the party's prospects. Ironically, Labour was the only party to back an AV referendum at this year's general election. Its pledge helped Mr Clegg persuade the Tories to allow a plebiscite as part of the Coalition agreement. Tory MP David Mowat, who had a majority of 1,553 over Labour in his Warrington South constituency in May, said: "If we did have AV and we put Lib Dems second and they put us second, it would be very likely to give us a better result than we might achieve under first-past-the-post. There could be a squeeze effect on Labour."

The down side for the LibDems is that such a voting pact could close the door to a Coalition deal with Labour if it emerged as the largest party after an election. One senior Liberal Democrat said: "This would be a win-win for the Tories. They are never going to form a Coalition Labour, but we might."

Liberal Democrats are confident that the AV referendum can be won even though the No campaign has been faster out of the starting blocks. They will try to make it a vote on the benefits of "coalition politics" rather than the Government's record. They believe the public like the idea of parties working together, even if they are worried about the spending cuts announced last month by George Osborne, the Chancellor.

Independent, 3rd Nov. 2010

It is worth remembering that the Powers That Be view us common folk as dumb cattle, stupid bovine cud-chewers, who roll out every few years and do what The Sun and the Daily mirror instructs us so to do. 

I would be sickened if I'd voted LD in the last election. The LD's are political whores, willing to deal with whoever can hand out a few baubles in return for their support.

Of course, I'm happy enough to see a change in the voting system, as they're always rigging the system to their own advantage anyway - the Boundary Commission is a prime example. Nothing changes, for they have all the prison cells and guns, so we have the system we've got and work within it.

It may just give smaller parties a bite out of the parliamentary cherry, such as the Greens and the BNP.

It may even implode the three main parties, which would be no loss, and a positive bonus, because we can force ideological and tactical difference from these shattered bodies - missing for thirty years. 

Cameron loves the European Union, just like all good liberals.

Reposted with thanks, as I feel this man has found one of the very nubs of the problem of Britain and the EU : the Tories have swindled us into believing they are eurosceptic (which many members and a few MP's certainly are) whilst, in practicable political terms they - the leadership - are most certainly europhile.

DaveWatch: Cast-Iron Cameron's latest transparent ploy to kick Europe into the long grass

Gerald Warner (LINK to the blog post) 

How was it for you? Dave’s Churchillian moment – you know, his blood, sweat and tears offering this afternoon that promised Britain freedom from the domination of dark forces on the continent – did it reassure you? The latest pledges from Cast-Iron Cameron do not include a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty, of course, but what metropolitan sophisticate would take those sort of histrionics seriously?

No, we are entering exciting new territory in the great Conservative Euro-scam. There will be a referendum – wait for it! – on all future EU treaties. The chancers in Brussels, having got everything they wanted, have made it clear they will not be writing any more treaties for a long time, so this is just a tad academic.

An important point: a Cameron government will not try to claw back any serious powers within six months or a year of taking office. No, our salvation will be worked out “over a parliament”. That is a polite term for five years of procrastination, to kick the EU issue into the long grass. But Dave will be pressing for “repatriation” of powers over employment law, the charter of fundamental rights and criminal law.

Uh-huh? Correct me if I am wrong, but surely those “competences” are all deeply embedded in reams of small print within the Lisbon Treaty. So, to renegotiate them, Dave and William Hague would have to re-open the treaty. But we are told the treaty is so set in concrete it cannot be revised and that is why voters cannot have a referendum on it. If the British electorate cannot revisit it, how can Dave and William do so? Do they take us all for mugs (evident answer: yes)?

But soft! This is by no means the limit of Cast-Iron Dave’s munificence. Through the mechanism of a sovereignty Bill, he is going to give us a constitutional court to protect us from EU encroachment. Just 24 hours after we saw a grey-faced Vaclav Kraus tell the world that, thanks to the ruling of an EU-compliant constitutional court, the Czech Republic had ceased to exist as a sovereign nation, Dave is offering us a similar chocolate fireguard to defend our sovereignty. Gee, thanks, Dave. What can I say? (I mean, what can I say that would be printable?)

A constitutional court would be a charter for judicial activism such as we daily see sell out British rights and interests to asylum seekers, terrorists, EU bureaucrats, et al. As for renegotiating a few minor aspects of the Lisbon Treaty, why does Cameron imagine he will carry more clout if he goes into the negotiating chamber without the massive endorsement of the electorate in a referendum, which would set real alarm bells ringing in Brussels, rather than with such a mandate?

All this Tory Euroguff is no more than a device to persuade gullible voters to stay with Dave and his forsworn party. Whether you fall for it or not is a simple intelligence test. Presumably, too, these scrappy, mini-commitments are as “cast-iron” as his previous unconditional pledge of a referendum. Tory rhetoric has now shifted, desperately, to a platform of preserving the remaining sovereign powers that Britain possesses post-Lisbon. What powers would those be, Dave?

The EU is popular with all liberals (left and right) because it BYPASSES Parliament, Constitution, and Law. The comrades in the Labour Party under Kinnock got this in the mid eighties - all their wet dreams could be foisted onto Britain not by long drawn out debates in Westminster, by arguing at the elections, but by diktat from an unelected Commissioner-Dictator from the EU Commission. And the lunatic libertarian "free market" & "no borders" Libertarians realised it earlier - imagine MILLIONS of Poles, Romanians, Bulgarians, Slovaks, falling over themselves to live on a pittance, in overcrowded slums, filling the chicken slaughtering factories, laying the foundations of glass and concrete Cathedrals of Capitalism.....

The Tories will not save us from tyranny because they are part of it.

Denis McShane, MP and cheerleader for Europe, Israel and Blair, investgated by the Police.

I hate and despise Denis McShane MP, for no better reason than he represents in political terms everything socially, morally, philosophically rotten about Britain.  Not for his political affiliation - they're all operating for the same global Boss, but because, in libe with every other piece of trash that infects the House of Commons, who have spent their time in political activity selling us to whatever gang of political psychopaths they deem suitable to their taste.

Who he, you ask?

Denis MacShane (born 21 May 1948) is a British Labour politician, who has been the Member of Parliament for Rotherham since the 1994 by-election, and served as the Minister of State for Europe from 2002 until 2005, as well as being a current Policy Council member for Labour Friends of Israel.

In 2005 he became a signatory of the Henry Jackson Society principles, advocating a proactive approach to the spread of liberal democracy across the world, including by military intervention. The society also supports "European military modernisation and integration under British leadership". In 2003 he criticised the Muslim community, saying they did not do enough to condemn acts of Islamic terrorism. He was a supporter of the 2003 invasion of Iraq and has strongly supported Tony Blair's foreign policy in relation to the Middle East, and elsewhere.

^Wikipedia.

^{Repusive little reptile.}

BNP Complaint Leads to Denis McShane’s Suspension

Fri, 15/10/2010 - 12:59 |  BNP News

A complaint submitted by British National Party activist Michael Barnbrook to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards has resulted in yet another Labour Party MP, Denis McShane, being placed under police investigation and suspended from his party.

Mr Barnbook, a former Metropolitan Police inspector, lodged his complaint with Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards John Lyon in June 2009, citing a number of examples of where Mr McShane had “breached the rules of the House” with regard to expenses.

In his letter, Mr Barnbrook pointed out that Mr Macshane used his office expenses to claim more than £5,900 for 8 machines between March, 2005 and January 2008.

“The computers, which cost between £498 and £1276 each, are in addition to technical equipment provided to MPs by Parliamentary authorities,” Mr Barnbrook continued.

Furthermore, Mr Barnbrook pointed out, the public records showed duplicate claims “in successive months for a computer of the same value, £498” and “more than £8,000 for translation services.”

Mr McShane also submitted more than a dozen invoices to the Commons fees office bearing the heading of the European Policy Institute. Each bill was justified by one line - ‘research and translation’ - followed by a demand for fees ranging between £550 and £950.

The European Policy Institute is controlled by Mr Macshane’s brother, Edmund Matyj Aszek.

“Finally, Mr Macshane has claimed expenses of nearly £20,000 a year for seven years in order to run his official constituency office from a shabby looking garage at his home address,” Mr Barnbrook added.

Mr Lyon then replied, asking for further details of the claims. Mr Barnbrook duly provided chapter and verse of the claims which he found logged on the ‘allowances by Members’ part of the Parliament website.

On 15 July last year, Mr Lyon wrote back to Mr Barnbrook and informed him that he was going to proceed with the investigation over the expenses claims, but not over the use of the “shabby garage” as a constituency office.

Mr McShane’s suspension will remain in place "until the question of possible criminal proceedings has been resolved,” said an official statement by Mr Lyon’s office.

Scotland Yard confirmed it is considering the complaint along with "a small number" of other outstanding expenses-related allegations.

McShane is unhappy that the tap of expenses has been shut off. 

He has previously strongly denied any wrongdoing. He has been one of the most high-profile critics of the new expenses system. 

Telegraph 14th October 2010

Further?

Independent

Telegraph

Protests 'frightening' for book party guests, says Tony Blair - UK Politics, UK - The Independent

You really are just a spatter of puke, Tomy.

If there is any justice in this world, Tony, you will, after a trial, be strung up with piano wire, but not before you have watched thousands die, and seen your family tortured and killed in front of you. That's what your  actions have lead to for MILLIONS of people in the Middle East.

And ironically, in your war for "democracy", you have destroyed the most modern most advanced, most secular country in the Middle East - Iraq. You suit the church you converted to, because only a man who admires the evil that emanates from the Roman Catholic church could be so blind to what he has done.

Tony Blair called off a party tonight to mark the launch of his new book, saying it would be "frightening" for his friends to have to walk past anti-war protesters.

Guests invited to the event, at the Tate Modern gallery in Central London, were told that it had been postponed, a spokeswoman for the book's publishers Random House said.

Campaigners against the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had planned to demonstrate outside Tate Modern and criticised the gallery for allowing the party to be held there.

Mr Blair told ITV1's This Morning: "It is sad in a way because you should have the right to sign books or see your friends if you want to.

"But it was going to cause so much hassle. The people at the party tonight are friends - and some of them are not political at all.

"I don't mind going through protesters - I have lived with that all my political life. But for other people it can be a bit unpleasant and frightening."

The party would go ahead at some stage as a thank you to the people who had helped produce the memoir, he said.

It is the second time the former prime minister has called off an event after he cancelled a signing session of his memoir, due to be held at the Waterstone's book store in London's Piccadilly today.

After cancelling the book signing the ex-premier said he did not want to subject the public to the "inevitable hassle" protests would cause or use up police resources keeping order at the event.

Lindsey German, convener of the Stop The War Coalition, who had planned to protest outside the Tate Modern gallery, said it was a "big victory" for the anti-war movement.

"Tony Blair is running scared of the peaceful, democratic protests which will follow him wherever he goes. A recent poll showed that close to 50% of the British public believes that Mr Blair lied to parliament and the country to take Britain into an illegal war.

"The anti-war movement is determined that one day he will be brought to account for his war crimes in Iraq.

"Those who oppose such protests would deny the rights of the anti war majority to make their feelings known and would ignore the terrible suffering of hundreds of thousands of victims of Mr Blair's wars in Iraq and Afghanistan."

Eggs and shoes were hurled by protesters and one attempted to make a citizen's arrest when Mr Blair signed copies of the book, A Journey, in Dublin last weekend.

The book is the biggest-selling title across the UK, with total sales of around 100,000.

Protests 'frightening' for book party guests, says Tony Blair - UK Politics, UK - The Independent

Multicultralism is communism: it is the death of the West.

 They know the game, they use the communists, who they will destroy once in power. In a certain way I admire them.

There can be no multicultural society. Wherever you look, you will find nothing like the communist dream. There NEVER has been.The communists are lying to you.

They claim that Rome were multicultural society. LIE.

Rome was founded by WHITE men and women, their armies were funded by and supplied by WHITE people.

Their error, like that of Egypt and Greece, was to become wealthy AND lazy - as we did in our own time.  They imported slaves from Africa and Asia to do the work which they themselves were too proud, lazy and feckless to do.

The Roman Empire became MULTIRACIAL, not multicultural.All must worship Caesar, all must become Romans in thought.

Eventually, these slaves were given freedom and allowed citizenship. And soon, the Roman  Empire collapsed. The more foreign elements which were foisted upon the citizenry, brining their own savage, barbaric DIFFERENT ways and beliefs with them, the faster the decline of the moral, philosophical and political basis of the Roman Empire, leading to disaster.

They DESTROYED the Roman Empire. Their own beliefs (good, bad or indifferent) were so at odds with the Romans that the barbaric, savage ways of the alien, overwhelmed the Romans.

Sound familiar? And in Britain today, the TV is used to spew these barbarities and this savagery into the minds of millions. The TV licence fee is used to destroy us, our culture, faith, beliefs. There is an army of communists pissing all over the British people, all funded by YOU.



The BBC, the Guardian, Socialist Workers Party - all one, indivisible. They are USING multiculturalism, and using Negroes and Asians, to DESTROY the West, it's moral, political and philosophical base. They HOPE that they can REPLACE white people with these alien elements, because they believe that the Negroes and Asians are more pliable, more modifiable to their Marxist desires.

We fund the prophets our own destruction.

BBC launches competition for multicultural writers as its sitcoms are branded 'too middle class'

By Tamara Cohen
Last updated at 8:10 AM on 20th August 2010

Creative head of the college Micheal Jacob, who is the executive producer of the sitcom My Family starring Zoe Wanamaker said yesterday:

'I think there is a feeling perhaps that the BBC is a closed door for writers who are not necessarily white middle class.
'I wanted to say the door is open and that we want to find shows that reflect the fact Britain is a multicultural society. We hope the competition will attract entries from writers who may feel their lives are not currently reflected in television comedy.' 

The BBC will have exclusive rights to develop the scripts, with the possibility of a commission further down the line.

The move follows criticism of the BBC in 2008, when Extras producer Charlie Hanson claimed the number of black people working in creative positions had not changed in 15 years, particularly within the comedy department.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1304608/BBC-competition-multicultural-writers-sitcoms-branded-middle-class.html#ixzz0x955CvVb

If Mr. Charlie Hanson wants to see more black people working in TV, why doesn't he just fuck off to Nigeria? Why isn't Mr. Hanson working for another company producing multi-culti PC bullshit? Because no-one would bother to watch it, so only the BBC- Bolshevik to the core - can afford to vomit money at a piece of social engineering like this.






To reiterate the point:
The Christians and Jews fell foul of Rome because they would not view and worship Caesar as GOD, not because they were not European(Multiculturalism). Had they worshipped Caesar as God (Multiracial) , they would have faced no persecution.

Settle down, watch the clips, learn. Youtube: "Why I hate the Sixties"

The Sixties were about money, perversion, depravity, and revolution. It's how the Communists gained power in the Western countries. It was all a lie, and we are living with the consequences.

NHS facing £65bn 'mortgage' bill for PFI - Telegraph

Figures obtained by the BBC show that some NHS trusts are spending more than 10 percent of their turnover on the annual ''mortgage'' repayments.

Under PFI, private companies win contracts to build and maintain new hospitals and mental health units and the NHS pays off the ''mortgage'' over around 30 years.

The 103 schemes were valued at a total of £11.3bn when they were built.

But when rising fees and additional costs such as maintenance, cleaning and catering are taken into account, the NHS will have to pay back £65.1bn over the lifetime of the schemes. Some contracts are reportedly so restrictive that trusts are forced to pay hundreds of pounds just to get half a dozen pictures put up.

According to the data, the NHS currently pays back a total of £1.25bn each year but this figure is expected to increase until 2030 when it will hit £2.3bn, the BBC reported.

The final payment will not be made until 2048.

Professor John Appleby, chief economist at the King's Fund health think-tank, said: ''It is a bit like taking out a pretty big mortgage in the expectation your income is going to rise, but the NHS is facing a period where that is not going to happen.''

Dr Mark Porter, of the British Medical Association, added: ''Locking the NHS into long-term contracts with the private sector has made entire local health economies more vulnerable to changing conditions.

''Now the financial crisis has changed conditions beyond recognition, so trusts tied into PFI deals have even less freedom to make business decisions that protect services, making cuts and closures more likely.''

Nigel Edwards, director of policy at the NHS Confederation, which represents trusts, told the BBC: ''They were planned for a different world. I'm sure that in some cases people feel their hands are tied.''

NHS facing £65bn 'mortgage' bill for PFI - Telegraph

They are all to blame for this, they all supported it, so Liberal Labour and Tory should be strung up in equal number and manner.


We will be bled white for decades for this.

Thousamd will arrive, thousands upon thousands, and the Supreme Court members will get more Police protection.

Abdul and Rafiq can't believe how helpful the Police at Calais are, knowing their Civil Partnership registration in Britain won't be delayed by paperwork or questions any longer, thanks to the UK Supreme Court.

Straight from the horses arse: 

The Supreme Court has ruled that two gay men from Iran and Cameroon have the right to asylum in the UK.

The pair took their cases to the court after being told by the Home Office they could safely return home if they were "discreet" about their sexual orientation.

The Cameroonian man, HT, argued he was told he could be sent home despite being attacked after he was seen kissing his partner.

The Iranian man, HJ, was told by a tribunal that he must expect persecution for his homosexuality and could avoid it by being discreet.

Lord Hope, who read out the judgment, said: "To compel a homosexual person to pretend that his sexuality does not exist or suppress the behaviour by which to manifest itself is to deny him the fundamental right to be who he is."

An earlier Court of Appeal decision said the government could return the pair to their home countries on the basis that they could be discreet, despite homosexuality being illegal in both countries and HT suffering violence from his neighbours.

The case was brought on behalf of the men by the London office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.

The men's lawyer, Iona Harding, of Baker & McKenzie, said: "This is an excellent result which will ensure that lesbian, gay and bisexual people receive the protection they are entitled to as refugees in the UK and are not expected to hide their identity in order to escape execution, long prison sentences or other forms of persecution."

Gay asylum campaigner Paul Canning told PinkNews.co.uk that the decision had "extremely broad implications" for gay asylum seekers in other countries due to the EU trying to bring standardise asylum policy.

He added: "This is a clear victory. It is one in the eye for the last government."

The court's judgment said that the term "concealment" was preferred to discretion, as this recognises that gay people in homophobic countries may need to be dishonest about their sexuality and that the average person would find it intolerable to have to conceal their sexuality for fear of persecution.

It added that UK authorities must consider whether asylum applicants have to conceal their sexuality at home for fear of persecution and if so, they should be given refugee status regardless of whether they can successfully keep their sexuality secret.

The coalition government has said it will introduce new rules to prevent the deportation of any gay asylum seeker who faces "imprisonment, torture or execution" if sent home.

Neither HT or HJ were at risk of torture or execution and neither said they had been imprisoned.

Home secretary Theresa May said: "I welcome the ruling of the Supreme Court, which vindicates the position of the coalition government.

"We have already promised to stop the removal of asylum seekers who have had to leave particular countries because their sexual orientation or gender identification puts them at proven risk of imprisonment, torture or execution.

"I do not believe it is acceptable to send people home and expect them to hide their sexuality to avoid persecution.

"From today, asylum decisions will be considered under the new rules and the judgment gives an immediate legal basis for us to reframe our guidance for assessing claims based on sexuality, taking into account relevant country guidance and the merits of each individual case.

"We will, of course, take any decisions on a case-by-case basis looking at the situation in the country of origin and the merits of individual cases in line with our commitment."

Every street in the land is to be filled to the brim with anyone who CLAIMS to be a queer, pooftah, shirtlifter, left footer, dyke, lezza or bumchum, because you an bet that this decision has gone double quick time along the jungle telegraph to each and every part of the world. 

This is no accident. This is no chance happening, not a rogue opinion. This spiteful, purposeful and meant to hammer at the indigenous Caucasian population of Britain. Unemployment stands at 2,500,000. Housing is in dire short supply. Public services are already to be cut by 20% or more. So who will lose out? 

Not the Moslem, the West African, the Gypsy. Not the Jew, not the Lesbian, not the child molester. 

These group above represent the protected "minority" who have and always have the first middle and last call on any public service or assistance because they scream DISCRIMINATION! HATER! BIGOT!

And now were officially importing more . Not content with ENDLESSLY INCREASING  the Islamist battle cry, the Call to Prayer, the Moldovan Child Porn and Prostitution racketeer, the Hindu Temple and the Negroid Drug Dealer, we now appear not to have enough homosexuals and lesbians, to drain away whatever public services are left to us when the International Military Industrial Complex has HAD IT'S LATEST BAIL OUT. 

Those who the gods wish to destroy, he first makes mad.

Immigration is wanted by who, and for why, exactly?

Key Facts

Net immigration quadrupled to 237,000 a year between 1997 and 2007. 

In 2008 it was 163,000. 

3 million immigrants have arrived since 1997.

A migrant still arrives every minute.

We must build a new home every six minutes for new migrants.

England is already, with Holland, the most crowded country in Europe
(except Malta)

Immigration will add 7 million to the population of England in the next 24 years - that is 7 times the population  of Birmingham.

To keep the population of the UK below 70 million, immigration must be reduced by 70%. Government measures so far may reduce it by 12%.

Adapted from Migration Watch UK.

So immigration is really NOT in the interests of the average British white man or woman then, and never has been, it has only ever been a COST, in one way or another.

A further complication is the requirement that an application to join the GP’s list can only be refused if there are reasonable grounds for doing so which “do not relate to the applicant’s race, gender, social class, age, religion, sexual orientation, appearance, disability or medical condition”. The paper continues “As the regulations stand this means that a practice has the discretion to offer NHS treatment to all people – UK residents and overseas visitors from any country.

...

The only way a GP could determine whether a non-eligible patient had a routine or minor condition that did not require immediately necessary treatment would be by seeing and examining him. By this stage the work would have been done.

Migration Watch here.

In the interests of the people?

Immigration

4. The ODPM statistical release attributes 123,000 of the additional households per year to adult population growth, 43,000 to more single households and 39,000 to more pensioners.
5. The projections of adult population include the effect of immigration. They assumed a net inflow of 130,000 people per year (to the UK as a whole). They also calculated the housing need on an assumption of zero net migration (i.e. immigration and emigration in balance). Under this scenario the average annual increase in the number of households would be 144,000 instead of the primary projection of 209,000 a year. The difference is the effect of immigration - 65,000 additional households each year. That amounts to 1.5 million over the period 2003 - 2026, or nearly a third of the total new households

Migration Watch here. 

Your son or daughter finding it hard to obtain accommodation? You watching your rent rise?Being taxed more to pay the Housing costs through Housing benefits?

6. Of the 115,000 births to foreign-born mothers, the origins of the mother were as follows:

7. Of the births to mothers from the New Commonwealth, the countries/regions of the mothers' origins were as shown below: 

8. In parts of the United Kingdom births to foreign-born mothers now represent more than 50% of all live births. In Inner London as a whole the figure is 55% with Tower Hamlets, Newham and Westminster having the highest percentages at 68%.

9. Outer London also has a high percentage of births to foreign-born mothers at 41% with the highest figure being recorded in Brent at 65%.

10. The percentage for Greater London as a whole is 47%, i.e. nearly one birth in every two in the capital is to a foreign-born mother.

11. Outside London, Manchester, Bradford, Leicester, Birmingham, Cambridge, Forest Heath (Suffolk), Slough and Oxford recorded more than 30% of births to foreign-born mothers.

Migration Watch here.

So, why is the migration wanted? Who wants it? Why would it be in any British interest to flood the United Kingdom with millions of immigrants?

The International, Global Elite. They appear to be like you, they talk warmly of Britain. They don't give a tinkers cuss for you, your children or future. Their entire purpose is a passive, retarded and stupefied population who will do as they're told.



They have brought wave after wave of immigrant, irrespective of their value, worth or even civilised attitudes, to make money.

They have been brought to replace the indigenous people. They are the weapon of ETHNOCIDE, to remove the British from the future, and replace us with - who?

The key finding: there are fewer British-born workers in the first quarter of 2009 than Q1 of 1997. The trend of employers preferring immigrants, which we saw during the boom, has become more marked still during the bust.

I count myself as a supporter of immigration. But there is no doubt that mass immigration has given ministers the option of ignoring our own unemployed. If we didn’t have this unending tap of motivated workers then Britain would be forced to confront the fact that so many of its workers are being incentivised to do nothing by the welfare state. Here’s what the benefit tally, including ‘hidden unemployment’, has looked like in the last decade – using the DWP’s definition of out-of-work benefits. 

At no point in the boom did the number on out-of-work benefits fall  below five million souls. Almost half have been on welfare for five years or more – and are, therefore, statistically more likely to die than to work again. As I say, were it not for immigration, we’d be forced to confront this problem or our economy would not grow. When I was a business journalist in the late 1990s, I remember writing stories about how bus companies were recruiting in homeless shelters because they couldn’t find the staff. The people in those shelters were being offered structure to their lives, from an employer forced by economic conditions to deal with the greater risk they pose. It was a sign of economic growth addressing social problems – as it should be.

Spectator (UK) here.

Unless WE do something about it, WE are simply going to disappear.

I haven't found a conspiracy theory I didn't think about.

There are conspiracies everywhere.



Some are ludicrous:

• Hitler was removed from the bunker in Berlin in a Yellow Submarine by, amongst others, Ian Fleming. 
• 99.9% of UFO stories
• Immigration is good for Britain
• The Queen is a literal reptillian creature

Real ones include:

• Vaccines are really not very good for you.
• David Icke speaks SOME truth but for financial reasons dresses much of it New Age mumbo jumbo like "Reptilian Creatures" because he is frightened identify those who are really at the core of the conspiracies, and because Yanks loved the 2012 end of the world trash
• There is a group called Common Purpose, who are busily infiltrating the British government right at this movement. 
• Many powerful positions, held both in government, media and the economy of Great Britain, the US, Australia, NZ and Canada, are held by Jews, out of proportion by their numbers within the population, who control the City of London.
•  Fluoride in Toothpaste is highly poisinous, a by-product of the aluminium industry, and was used by both Hitler (Concentration Camps) and Stalin (Gulags), and does nothing to halt tooth decay.
• George Bernard Shaw, H G Wells, Annie Besant, Eleanor Marx, and others created the Fabian Society, a revolutionary group, whose purpose is to carry out a scientific revolution, described in the novel, and film, "Things to Come" (written by HG Wells), part of which is an enormous Eugenics campaign, of us common folk here in Britain.
• We have been financially raped over the past sixty years under the guise of modernism and socialism. 
• There are many, many Jesuits, Knights of Malta, Opus Dei and other Roman Catholic fraternity members deeply embedded in the British parliament, whose purpose is to return Britain to the control of the Vatican. 

Most of us have been duped. The vast majority of Roman Catholics and Jews are as dumb a group of sheep as 99.9% of Freemasons, Pagans/Wiccans, Socialists, Libertarians. Reading The Guardian is a good indicator of stupidity, but not foolproof. The Jesuits, Zionists are really wolves in sheep's clothing, just as the chap in the first video above says. There is no "one group" who is to "blame" , they are merely exoteric facets of the esoteric - unseen - invisible hand controlling events.

To reiterate:

The reality is that Jesuits, and Zionists, Freemasons, all believe in the same thing: they are Luciferians : they are Humanists. They gained control of Europe in the Enlightenment, and it is why we are where we are today. They are not Jews, Or Roman Catholics, or Protestants, even if the claim to be so: those ideologies are in their eyes, for the profane, the temporal, the stupid sheep (they are not interested as to whether there is any truth in them either, they have their own truths). 

Now, we know that all of the major political parties, plus the Green Party, are all the same, just dressed differently, like shop dummies in the department store window.
We know that the system is rigged to keep the scum who sell their soul for thirty pieces of silver - professional "Politicians" are worthless. They are puppets.




Democracy in the modern, bourgeois sense, is worthless. The moment those from outside the political grid come close to power, the mechanisms they planned to use, once in their elected places, are destroyed and new ones substituted.
The most that we can hope to achieve from the electoral system is to awaken people, to recruit people into some form of alternative structure, eventually bypassing Parliament, and allowing it to decay.
Successful revolutions require less than 15% of the people to take a stand. It's deciding what that stand is, that's the problem.

Time to make a start.