Timing, old boy, timing: ruined careers, missing Prime Ministers, death of a journalist.

Since we are to have a Judicial Inquiry into the wicked Press, shouldn’t we also have one into wicked politicians? 

Journalists can be nasty, and newspapers beastly, but their misdeeds are as nothing set beside those of governments.

Governments also hack into phones, poke their noses into our personal affairs and misuse the information they obtain.

Peter Hitchens, the Daily Mail, 17th July 2011. Daily Mail, 17th July 2011.

There is a war going on internally, with the elites of the world. It is not our war, except in the sense that it is happening in public, so we perceive it. 
The Elite of the world are not a monolithic group either in membership or methodology: they are divided at times not on ends but means and strategy, and occasionally, like through a glass darkly, we are allowed a fleeting view. 
However whatever the punch line of this fracas, there will be no good in it for NO-ONE other than THEM. Both sides are commited to the same outcome, which will mean more death, mayhem rape and pillage for US ALL. 
For the UK, this is a battle between the "liberal" and "conservative" faction for control. The Labour Party, Guardian  and  BBC is ranged against the Tories and News International. 
That;'s certainly how it appars. 
But there is something deeper: 
WHERE ARE MURDOCH's friends in all of this. NO-ONE is speaking for News International or Murdoch. And yet Murdoch is a Papal Knight and one of the most openly commited ZIONISTS within Western media circles. Where are for example the US neocons, whom Murdoch did so much for over 20 years? Where are the Jesuits, ot the spokesmen of the Vatican? Where are his Jewish Zionist neocon buddies in the NY media set?

'Someone's coming to get me': Terrified phone-hacking whistleblower feared for his life before he was found dead

• http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2016132/Sean-Hoare-dead-News-World-phone-hacking-whistleblower-feared-life.html#ixzz1SZbuozrY

  
  

  Sean Hoare found dead at his flat in Watford, Herts

• Ex NotW reporter's claims last autumn reignited scandal

• Mr Hoare claimed Coulson's denials of phone hacking were 'a lie'

• Police probing former showbiz reporter's 'suicide'

• Friends suggest he may have died of natural causes

• Post mortem being carried out this morning

The pins are really beginning to fall. A dead Journalist, senior policemen have gone, and now the politicians are going directly into the spotlight. 

Times of India: 19th July 2011

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/uk/Hacking-row-may-singe-Cameron/articleshow/9278259.cms

LONDON: The News of the World crisis turned severe after UK's top police officer and one of his deputies resigned following allegations of taking favours from an ex-editor of the publication. Stephenson, London's metropolitan police commissioner at Scotland Yard, took responsibility for his force appointing Neil Wallis, a former deputy editor of News of the World, as a public relations adviser. 

Pointing a finger at Cameron, Stephenson suggested the PM risked being "compromised" by his proximity to former NOTW editor and Cameron's media director until January, Andy Coulson. "Once Neil Wallis's name did become associated (with hacking scandal), I did not want to compromise the PM in any way by revealing or discussing a potential suspect who clearly had a close relationship with Coulson," said Stephenson. Coulson is currently on bail. 

Where's Cameron? Skulking abroad in South Africa: 

The Metro: 19th July 2011

http://www.metro.co.uk/news/869711-david-cameron-survival-odds-plummet-after-calls-for-pm-to-quit

The odds on the prime minister leaving office plummeted after he came under fire for leaving for the trip on Sunday night and for his links to News International.

Mr Cameron is today due to return early from the planned four-day visit to Africa, and faces an emergency extra session in the House of Commons tomorrow.

Labour frontbencher Yvette Cooper said it looked like ‘one rule for the police and one for the prime minister’ – a reference to Sunday’s resignation of Met boss Sir Paul Stephenson over the scandal.

Sir Paul had aimed a barb at Mr Cameron’s ties to shamed former News of the World editor Andy Coulson, who was employed as the prime minister’s head of communications in Downing Street.

Labour backbenchers Dennis Skinner and Sir Gerald Kaufman called for the prime minister to quit. ‘When is dodgy Dave going to do the decent thing and resign?’ Mr Skinner asked.

Labour leader Ed Miliband refused to call for Mr Cameron’s head. It was, however, time for the prime minister to ‘apologise’ for employing Mr Coulson, he said. Deputy prime minister Nick Clegg said Mr Cameron should ‘absolutely not’ resign.

He added: ‘Let’s keep some perspective. The fear that people have is that a criminal investigation could be jeopardised by the contact between the police and media.’

Downing Street said the Africa trip was beneficial in drumming up British business opportunities. And Mr Cameron insisted he was taking ‘all appropriate action’, such as setting up a judicial inquiry into the hacking scandal.

‘I have been out there in parliament and in press conferences, fully answering the questions, fully transparent, very clear about what needs to be done,’ he added.

MPs will today quiz News Corporation chief Rupert Murdoch, his son, James – chairman of News International – and NI’s former chief executive Rebekah Brooks over phone-hacking and police corruption allegations.

Bookmaker Ladbrokes yesterday slashed the odds on Mr Cameron leaving office from 100/1 to 8/1.

 

Libya, it's all about peace, prosperity and liberty, right?

NB : I DESPISE Islam here in Western nations. What the bunch of sub human savages choose to do in their own nations, what philosophies they choose to accept, idols they worship - IN THEIR HOMELAND - I care not a jot. They have every right to live as they will, as long as they all fuck off from the West and allow us to do AS WE CHOOSE. 

There's a rule of thumb in the household of which I am the totalitarian Dear Leader, that if The Guardian is huffing out some fuckwittery about any given subject, it's generally sane to see the opposite as true.

Look at Deputy Leader of the Labour Party, Harriet Harman PC MP, the Guardian loves her and no-one who isnt either (1) a physically and emotionally castrated man or (2) a mouth breathing closet or open bull dyke does. 

And the same is true for the whole Libya bollocks. And the whole Arab Spring crap too. If you're some Social Worker, blubber over the plight of the Yemenis, or Libyans, or Egyptians this is going to come hard to you - the whole thing is about a NEW WORLD ORDER and a billion followers of Islam are in the way.It's not about changing the world so that the lion lays down with the lamb, no-one's beating swords into ploughshares, it's about COMMUNISM.

Not the bullshit "Workers Paradise" that the sheeple, the useful idiots ((c) VI Lenin) dream of when reading Socialist Review, or the Morning Star. Anarchism, Socialism, Communism, Social Democracy, Liberal Democracy, Liberalism, Libertarianism, Syndicalism, Conservatism - are all created to fool and blind the mass of people.

Oh no.

This is about communism for the RICH, the POWERFUL, the ELITES of the world. Their COMMUNISM always ensures they WIN, they remain all powerful, always in control.

The rest of us get CAPITALISM, the harshest, free market version of capitalism, the rule by faceless, impersonal, inhuman   CORPORATIONS of seven billion people. We get bled, beaten, jailed, exploited, stripped of our assets, killed, taxed, spied on, fined, starved and raped (metaphorically and literally) in one degree or another, depending on time and place.

The last standing relatively free peoples of the world are the vast swathes of the Middle East. They reject what is now the standing system of the world conomic system - the Coca Cola & Porn Free Market.

They have cranky ideas - such as Usury being an evil thing, Homosexuality being a no-no, Alcohol  being forbidden,by their god, same with pornography, and that life isn't about making the biggest  pile of gold before you die. These cranky ideas don't fit with the Jew Talmud, which declares that all other creatures except them are for use by them, live or die at their behest. For profit. 

So, retarding the Arab folk back, using IMF tactics of smashing public services, combined with the reintroduction of the more retarded flavours of Islam - from, for example, the Moslem Brotherhood and The Saudi Wahabbists (both children of MI6, now MOSSAD/MI6/CIA ) : 

"The Jesuits created the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in 1932 using their fanatical, Islamic cult known as "Wahhabi Islam." Wahhabi Islam, "the Sword of the C...hurch" intended to be used against apostate, White Protestant, Western Civilization, was a creation of the Society of Jesus using certain Papal Knights controlling the once Protestant British Empire. With the Empire having been governed by the Order through Freemasonry for the last two hundred years, Wahhabi Islam was fortified during the reign of that wicked, Jesuit-controlled murderer of the Irish people, Queen Victoria of England. British SIS agent, English noble and Knight of Malta, Sir John Philby, feigned himself to be a Wahhabi among the Arabs, thereby facilitating the enthronement of Masonic Ibn Saud as the first king of Saudi Arabia. Both Freemasons Winston Churchill and, yes, Benito Mussolini, whose confessor was a powerful Italian Jesuit and the Secretary of the Company, Pietro Tacchi-Venturi, also aided in the establishment of the Masonic Islamic Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. "Allied" Britain and "Axis" Italy worked together, as they would during Jesuit-trained, Jesuit-favored and Jesuit-advised, Pope Pius XII's World War II, the grand finale of the Black Pope's SecondThirty Years' War (1914-1945)."http://www.thyselfknown.com/profiles/blogs/the-muslim-brotherhood-and-the

Much of the "Arab Spring" is a sideshow: funded by and organised by MI6/MOSSAD/CIA, assisted by GOOGLE, TWITTER and FACEBOOK. The ONLY beneficiaries are the VATICAN city state, spiritual hub of the NWO, who is seeing the re-establishment of it's lost North African ancient Empire, the city state of WASHINGTON DC, military HQ of the NWO,  which gains a real foothold in North Africa, and our playmates in the CITY OF LONDON, the world financial city state, which forsees billions in cash to snap up assets in the failing western nations at pennies in the pound. 

There is one major prize: LIBYA. 

In no particular order :

(1) Gaddafi made a deal to sell LIBYAN OIL to China, boogeyman of the Neocons. 

(2) Gaddafi spent large sums on housing and welfare for the Libyan people, bad for profit.

(3) Gaddafi was attempting to build a "United States of Africa", bad for business.

(4) Gaddafi had planned for Libya to become (a) self sufficient in major foods, and then (b) for Libya to become a breadbasket for Africa. Ditto. 

(5) Gaddafi had bluntly and publicly questioned the role of the Saudi royal family in political activities. Bad news for the House of Saud. 

(6) Gaddafi took control of the crude oil under Libyan soil and has refused to allow western corporations to profit from it - Libyans have had a fair slice of the cake, as it were.... Bad for profit. 

etc. 

WATCH THE VIDEO:

No war for Israel, no war for BP. If you support the war against Libya, that's in reality what you're doing. And when these Jew owned, Jesuit controlled, bastards and children of the Synagogue of Satan, have finished with Johnny Arab, he'll turn on us. In this issue, we stand together or by God we'll hand separately.

WATCH THE VIDEO:

This person - man or woman, or collective, I know not - writes far better than I do, and he, she, they are better researched than I am. http://aangirfan.blogspot.com/

Euro dying.

Do I trust Nigel Farage? No. Do I think he's the brains of the operation of UKIP, and is - whatever we think of him - a very good speaker? Damn right.

The EU is an Empire. Britain is a colony. The death of the Euro - debased paper currency of the Eurodream - could well be the death of the European Empire.

Yemen: the next target of the CIA, and the next International Aid from the UK.

Britain is part of a worldwide conspiracy, the purpose of which is to install a New World Order, consisting of a World Government, from the rubble of the United Nations, operated by the Communist-Zionist-Talmudic global corporate elite bloodline families.

The US wants an Empire, just like the British Empire. It wants to control the world, to crush opposition to the envisaged New World Order. In practicable terms, controlling the "gateways" of the world, like, say, Gibraltar and Cyprus (as the UK does) controls the Mediterranean Sea, and the northern end of the Suez Canal, get it?

Yemen, when it was controlled by Britain, was known as "Aden".With Yemen in the grip of the US military and CIA/MOSSAD/MI6, all traffic between the Indian Ocean and the Mediterranean Sea, via the Suez Canal, is completely controlled.

And they are to be brought under the control of the Anglo US axis by all means necessary. 

In addition to adding new urgency and a fresh dose of hysteria to the flagging war on manufactured terror, the toner bomb plot has provided an excuse to rationalize the global reach of the CIA.

(...)

 “Allowing the U.S. military’s Special Operations Command units to operate under the CIA would give the U.S. greater leeway to strike at militants even without the explicit blessing of the Yemeni government,” or the American people who, as usual, remain woefully uninformed.

(...)

Exploiting the obviously contrived Yemen toner bomb plot (see Paul Watson’s article today) as an excuse to shift more operational control to an unaccountable CIA would reduce conflict between the CIA’s National Clandestine Service and the more clandestine parts of USSOCOM. It would also consolidate operations.

(...)

 We are told the Obama administration is behind the effort to put the CIA’s “elite U.S. hunter-killer teams that operate secretly” inside Yemen, but the effort transcends any perceived rule by the teleprompter reader in chief.

Infowars 1st Nov. 2010

 And:

According to the London Guardian, Awlaki is now the “prime suspect” in the cargo plane bomb plot. He is also fingered as the mastermind by BBC News, and the London Telegraph amongst others. The man who allegedly made the ink toner cartridges that were later claimed to be deadly explosive devices was Saudi Arabian-born Ibrahim Hassan Al Asiri. Al Asiri is “in regular contact in Yemen with radical cleric Anwar Awlaki,” reports the Daily Mail.

As we reported last month, every indication points to American-born cleric Awlaki being a double agent working for US intelligence. He has been involved in almost every terror plot over the last couple of years, from directing the underwear bomber, who was allowed to board the plane by order of the US State Department aided by a well-dressed man who got Abdulmutallab on the airliner despite the fact that he was on a terror watchlist and had no passport, to advising Fort Hood shooter Major Nidal Malik Hasan. Authorities have engaged in a cover-up of what happened at Fort Hood after they ordered Private Lance Aviles to delete cell phone footage of the attack.

Infowars 1st Nov 2010 

And of course, once Yemeni society has been ruined by the covert CIA/MOSSA/MI6 terror campaign, the probable civil war sparked by both covert and direct warfare, we will need to "democratise" and "rebuild" Yemen.

A gathering in Riyadh next February was possibly "the last chance" to turn things around in Yemen, Mr Duncan said.

He warned that the country was at risk of sliding into "chaos", allowing al Qaida to flourish and present a security threat to the rest of the world.

In a speech to Chatham House in London, Mr Duncan said the cargo plane bomb plot demonstrated the need to tackle Yemen's problems on an international level.

"The lesson from other countries is that if we sit around and analyse a country on the edge of collapse for too long, by the time we decide to do anything about it, it's already too late," he said.

"That may be just where we are heading with Yemen."

Mr Duncan said Yemen was "high" on the coalition Government's agenda and of particular interest to the National Security Council.

"Yemen in collapse could lead to a litany of chaos - no water, no energy, no food, civil strife, al Qaida flourishing, increasing radicalisation, and a regional and international threat both to world energy supplies and to many nations' security," he said.

But he called for the international community to help tackle problems like poverty, disease and lack of education rather than wielding "a big stick".

"There are two ways Yemen's problems could be approached," he said.

"We can either address the underlying causes of poverty, grievance, joblessness and governance, or the international community could begin to start shouting and wave a big stick.

"For us in the coalition Government and (the Department for International Development), we are going to put development at the heart of an integrated approach for Yemen."

A ministerial meeting of the Friends of Yemen in the capital of neighbouring Saudi Arabia had the potential to be "a major turning point" for the country, he said.

"We don't have long. The next Friends of Yemen meeting in Riyadh is in February, only a few months away," he said.

"More than any other meeting before it, the Friends of Yemen meeting in Riyadh is possibly both a golden opportunity and the last chance there will be to address Yemen's problems before it is too late."

Mr Duncan added: "The next two months in the run-up to Riyadh are crucial, and the rhetoric we've all been hearing must now become reality."

 Independent (UK), Nov. 1st, 2010

There you go then. CIA creates the problem, the Yemenis react, he UN/NATO/Zio-Communists offer a solution. Another part of the jigsaw, placed into the great picture.

If I thought that this is just a good hard kicking for the Moslems, keep them in line etc, I wouldn't give a toss, as Islam is a viscous cruel and savage pagan religion, that, had it never existed, the world would not be any the less interesting. 

But this merely about control, on a scale unknown by man before. This is about changing the world, in the favour of the global ruling elites, who want to be the iron shod boot smashing us collectively in the face forever.  Islam stands in the way of this, as did Christianity at one time, and what the powerful cannot adapt to their purpose - like Christianity - they will destroy, as they are Islam presently.

Yes, the Tories will cut whatever services are to be left after the recent cuts, and shovel money into yet another black hole, in the Middle East, all on the orders of the City of London (Finance), Washington DC (Military) and the Vatican (Spiritual), all in the name of creating a New World Order.

Is that an Eye, all seeing, above the letter "I" ?

The story of Lord Northcliffe. The power of organized Jewery.

Sometimes truths are collated and served by less than salubrious people. This is one such case. However the saying "Where there's muck, there's Brass" is true. Hold your nose and read Mr. Strom's essay, which apparently is true.

Lord Northcliffe  was a victim of the Zionist establishment whose story deserves to be told, though it was covered up for decades. The lessons for us in his story are deep and profound.
 
by Kevin Alfred Strom (LINK to essay)

THE PRESS MAGNATE Alfred Harmsworth, later Britain’s Lord Northcliffe, once said: “News is what someone, somewhere is trying to suppress; the rest is just advertising.” Despite the fact that he was one of the most powerful men in what was then the British Empire, Northcliffe would eventually pay for that attitude with his life.

Northcliffe’s fall — from being one of the most powerful men in the world to being imprisoned as insane after which he quickly died — took only a few days. The trigger was his challenge to the Jewish power structure.

Northcliffe, who lived from 1865 to 1922, stood up to the political establishment of his time, damning Lord Kitchener during World War I when he was considered a war hero — and thereby engendering the hatred of millions and driving the circulation of his flagship paper down by some 80 per cent. He emerged victorious, just as he had in earlier decades when his business acumen and editorial skill had made him the outright owner of the two of the most widely read newspapers in Britain (and many other periodicals) and the majority proprietor of the then-leading newspaper in the world, The Times of London. Lord Northcliffe was possibly the earliest example of the modern press baron.

Northcliffe was a man who was a bit of a jingoistic nationalist — he took regrettable anti-German and anti-Boer positions, for example — and it is said that he would do almost anything to increase the circulation of the newspapers that he owned. Douglas Reed, in his interesting book The Controversy of Zion, writes “He was sometimes right and sometimes wrong in the causes he launched or espoused, but he was independent and unpurchasable. He somewhat resembled Mr. Randolph Hearst and Colonel Robert McCormick in America, which is to say that he would do many things to increase the circulation of his newspapers, but only within the limits of national interest; he would not peddle blasphemy, obscenity, libel or sedition. He could not be cowed and was a force in the land.”

Northcliffe, the son of an English barrister, was born Alfred Harmsworth near Dublin on the 15th of July 1865. With his brother Harold (later Lord Rothermere) he started the magazine Answers to Correspondents in 1888, which rapidly became a success with its question-and-answer format, selling over a million copies a week. He then founded a children’s newspaper, Comic Cuts, a woman’s magazine, Forget-Me-Nots, purchased the bankrupt Evening News and made it a success by modernizing it, and founded the revolutionary Daily Mail, which pioneered low-cost production, lavish use of illustrations, the smaller tabloid paper size, terse, fact-filled writing, sports and women’s sections, serial novels, and banner headlines. By the time of the Boer war, the paper sold a million copies a day. Harmsworth took what he considered a patriotic position, stating that the Mail stood for “the power, the supremacy and the greatness of the British Empire.”

The part-Jewish publisher Joseph Pulitzer was so impressed with Harmsworth’s talents that he hired him to edit the first edition of his brand new New York World on the first day of the twentieth century, which he did — using the tabloid (meaning compressed) size which he had pioneered and named, and which later become the dominant format for British newspapers.

One failure of Northcliffe was his launching of the first daily newspaper for women, the Daily Mirror, which did eventually become a success when he made it into a picture newspaper for both sexes. He took his losses and accepted his defeat with philosophy and humor, saying “Disaster may often be changed to triumph by alteration in tactics. The faculty of knowing when you are beaten is much more valuable than the faculty of thinking you are not beaten when you are. I had for many years a theory that a daily newspaper for women was in urgent request, and I started one. The belief cost me £100,000. I found out that I was beaten. Women don’t want a daily paper of their own. It was another instance of the failures made by a mere man in diagnosing women’s needs. Some people say that a woman never really knows what she wants. It is certain she knew what she didn’t want. She didn’t want the Daily Mirror.”

It was in 1905, the same year that he purchased The Times and the Sunday Observer, that his achievements were recognized by his being made Lord Northcliffe — at 40 the youngest-ever peer of the realm. [ http://tinyurl.com/2wfla ]

The First World War was a tragedy of bloodletting, destruction, and death for millions of the best young men of our European race on every side of the conflict — a tragedy from which we have still not yet recovered. Its origins are lost in obscure and shifting alliances, commercial jealousy, and the cynical ‘balance of power’ policy favored by the British Empire at the expense of pan-European interests. Its end was a farrago of madness in which avarice, revenge, crackpot ‘liberal’ nuttiness, and Zionism dominated. It is this last item — Zionism — with which we are — and Lord Northcliffe was — concerned.

According to a defector from the Jewish power structure of the time, Benjamin Freedman, Britain was on the verge of losing that war in 1917, when the Zionist Jews made a proposal to the British government. Britain could yet win this war, the Zionists argued, if America could be brought into the conflict on Britain’s side. With their already-substantial control of the American press, and with their tight circle of ‘advisors’ around President Wilson (who was beholden to them because of indiscreet letters in their possession which he had written to a woman not his wife), the Zionists made a good case that they could deliver what they promised. But there was a price to be paid. The British Empire was at that time administering the small Middle Eastern territory of Palestine, populated mainly by Palestinian Arabs and Christians and with only a small minority of Jews. The Zionist Jews coveted that territory — which later became Israel when their land-grab came to fruition — and their price for bringing American soldiers to die in Flanders fields was a declaration from Britain that the Empire favored the establishment of a Jewish state there. The price was paid. Lord Milner and Foreign Minister Balfour drafted the Balfour Declaration — and the puppeteers pulled the strings on crackpot Wilson and America went to war to “make the world safe for democracy’ and to “end war,” proving that many Americans had had their brains turned to mush long before the advent of television.

The scholar Revilo Oliver has stated that Milner’s interest in supporting the Zionists, apart from the immediate objective of winning the war, was in removing as many Jews as possible from Britain, and giving them their own country thousands of miles away seemed as good a way of doing that as any. Similar motives animated Balfour, as I stated on this program last year:

“…Balfour’s naiveté [is] in this case, a stand-in and symbol of White naiveté in general. The Jews wanted a policy statement from the then-dominant world power, the British Empire, and they got it and used it to the hilt, not hesitating to kill Britons when it suited them, as in the Zionist bombing of the King David Hotel, and while other Jews were, especially after World War II, doing everything in their power to undermine the status of the White nations including Britain. The Zionist entity has outlasted the British Empire which gave it birth, though Little Britain is still of some assistance in some projects, like the murder of Iraqis, currently being undertaken by the self-styled masters of the world. What’s really interesting about Balfour, who gave the Jews their foothold in Palestine, was that he didn’t particularly like Jews — and that he was a racialist. Like Adolf Hitler later, Balfour was enamoured of the idea of the Jews leaving Europe to found their own state elsewhere. Both men negotiated with Zionist Jews to effect that end. Hitler offered them Madagascar in 1938. In 1903, while he was Prime Minister, Balfour offered them Uganda. In debates on the Alien Act of 1905, Balfour sought to cut off Jewish immigration into Britain. Balfour openly admitted in 1914 (to leading Zionist Chaim Weizmann, no less) that he shared the extreme anti-Jewish sentiments of Cosima Wagner. Balfour [even] spoke against Jewish immigration in the House of Commons.”

After the war, Lord Northcliffe became alarmed by Zionist ambitions and Jewish power. In 1920, he publicized the book that has been banned and furiously denounced by the Jews perhaps more than any other, the famous Protocols of Zion, which purports to be notes taken at a meeting of Jews sometime during the nineteenth century, detailing a plan for world domination through intrigues, deception, and terror. I have already published my criticism of the Protocols elsewhere, but suffice it to say here that, although the book is unlikely to be what it claims to be — an actual record of an actual meeting — and though it clearly was created by a polemicist with a religious bias (witness its barbs directed at Darwin and Nietzsche, for example), its insights into the Jewish mentality and Jewish techniques are insightful and its tracing (before 1905!) of many of the paths that would be taken by the Jewish establishment in the last century are amazing.

Northcliffe probably saw the Protocols much as I see them, and decided they deserved to be seen and investigated by the British people. Accordingly he saw to it that significant parts of them were published in the most prestigious newspaper in the country, The Times, of which he was the principal owner, under the title ‘The Jewish Peril, a Disturbing Pamphlet, Call for Enquiry.’ He did not declare the Protocols to be true, but rather called for a full investigation to discover whether or not they were true. He stated that “an impartial investigation of these would-be documents and of their history is most desirable … are we to dismiss the whole matter without inquiry and to let the influence of such a book as this work unchecked?”

In 1922, Northcliffe asked the editor of The Times, Wickham Steed, to travel to Palestine to investigate the real nature of the Zionist project there, feeling sure that Steed, once he saw how a tiny and foreign Jewish minority was determined to use every foul means to dispossess the Palestinians, would make a 180 degree turn and stop supporting Chaim Weizmann and the other Zionists as he had theretofore. In this Northcliffe miscalculated badly, for the Zionist hold on Steed (the exact nature of which deserves further investigation) was so strong that Steed openly refused to act upon any of the requests of the man who was the majority owner of the paper and who was therefore his employer! Steed would not go to Palestine; Steed would not publish an article critical of Balfour’s attitude toward Zionism when asked to do so; and, when Northcliffe himself went to Palestine, Steed would not even publish Northcliffe’s own dispatches from that troubled land. Who was protecting Steed? Who and what was motivating Steed? These questions became even more important later that year. Douglas Reed wrote:

Then in 1922 Lord Northcliffe visited Palestine, accompanied by a journalist, Mr. J.M.N. Jeffries (whose subsequent book, Palestine: The Reality, remains the classic work of reference for that period). This was a combination of a different sort from that formed by the editors of The Times and Manchester Guardian, who wrote their leading articles about Palestine in England and in consultation with the Zionist chieftain, Dr. Weizmann. Lord Northcliffe, on the spot, reached the same conclusion as all other impartial investigators, and wrote, “In my opinion we, without sufficient thought, guaranteed Palestine as a home for the Jews despite the fact that 700,000 Arab Moslems live there and own it … The Jews seemed to be under the impression that all England was devoted to the one cause of Zionism, enthusiastic for it in fact; and I told them that this was not so and to be careful that they do not tire out our people by secret importation of arms to fight 700,000 Arabs … There will be trouble in Palestine . . . people dare not tell the Jews the truth here. They have had some from me.”

The articles by Jeffries and Northcliffe didn’t get published in The Times, but they did see the light of day in Northcliffe’s other papers, greatly alarming the Zionists, who needed the acquiescence of the British people for their land-grab to succeed.

Things started happening very fast for Lord Northcliffe soon thereafter. On February 26th, 1922, he returned from Palestine. On March 2d, he strongly criticized Steed at an editorial conference, expecting to precipitate his resignation. To Northcliffe’s amazement, Steed did not resign but decided to consult an attorney “to secure a lawyer’s opinion on the degree of provocation necessary to constitute unlawful dismissal.” Then, Steed says, he consulted Northcliffe’s own legal advisor who supposedly stated that Lord Northcliffe was “abnormal”, “incapable of business” and, judging from his appearance, “unlikely to live long” and who therefore advised the editor “to continue in his post.” On March 31st, Steed went to see Northcliffe in France and upon returning started spreading the story — even telling a director of the paper — that Northcliffe was “going mad.”

Douglas Reed himself worked with Northcliffe a few weeks later and reports he saw nothing at all indicating illness, madness, or abnormality of any kind. Reed also states that a very sane and sober Northcliffe informed him that someone was trying to kill him. Reed tells us:

The suggestion of madness thus was put out by an editor whom Lord Northcliffe desired to remove and the impressions of others therefore are obviously relevant. On May 3, 1922 Lord Northcliffe attended a farewell luncheon in London for a retiring editor of one of his papers and “was in fine form.” On May 11, 1922 he made “an excellent and effective speech” to the Empire Press Union and “most people who had thought him ‘abnormal’ believed they were mistaken.” A few days later Lord Northcliffe telegraphed instructions to the Managing Director of The Times to arrange for the editor’s resignation. This Managing Director saw nothing “abnormal” in such an instruction and was not “in the least anxious about Northcliffe’s health.” Another director, who then saw him, “considered him to have quite as good a life risk as his own”: he “noticed nothing unusual in Northcliffe’s manner or appearance” (May 24, 1922).

On June 11th, Steed met Northcliffe again in France and Northcliffe bluntly told him that he, Northcliffe, would now assume editorship of The Times. The next day, Steed, Northcliffe, and the entire entourage were aboard a train bound for Evian-les-Bains. Unknown to Northcliffe, a doctor (whose name has not been revealed to this day) was secreted aboard the train by Steed, and somehow Northcliffe was manipulated into his custody. When the train arrived in Switzerland another unnamed physician (described years later only as “a brilliant French nerve specialist”) was summoned and declared Northcliffe “insane.” Immediately Steed telegraphed the ‘news’ to London and ordered The Times to disregard and not to publish any communications from its primary owner. On June 13th, Steed returned to London. On June 18th, Northcliffe was back in London, too, but in custody and totally removed from all control of or communication with his far-flung enterprises. Even his telephone lines were cut. Police were posted at the offices of The Times to prevent his entering should he reach them. He never did.

On that same day, with Northcliffe out of circulation and his powerful voice of protest silenced, the League of Nations voted to reconfirm the ‘British Mandate’ in Palestine, which had mutated into a ‘mandate’ to install the Zionists in power there by violence and fraud.

On August 14th, 1922 Lord Northcliffe died, supposedly the cause of death being “ulcerative endocarditis.” None of the story of his alleged insanity or confinement was known to the public at the time. It was concealed for thirty years, eventually coming out in the Official History of The Times and, in greater detail in Reed’s The Controversy of Zion.

When Northcliffe died, he left in his will three month’s salary to each of his 6,000 employees, a total of 533,000 pounds — a huge sum in today’s inflated currency. The story of Northcliffe’s challenge to the Zionists deserves more study, as does the continuation of that challenge by Northcliffe’s brother Harold, Lord Rothermere. Rothermere eventually came to the conclusion that Jewish power needed to be defeated for the good of Europe, and that Britain’s best interest lay in support of the other European nations which had begun the fight.

Lord Rothermere wrote in the Daily Mail for the 10th of July, 1933:

I urge all British young men and women to study closely the progress of the Nazi regime in Germany. They must not be misled by the misrepresentations of its opponents. The most spiteful detractors of the Nazis are to be found in precisely the same sections of the British public and press as are most vehement in their praises of the Soviet regime in Russia. They have started a clamorous campaign of denunciation against what they call “Nazi atrocities” which, as anyone who visits Germany quickly discovers for himself, consists merely of a few isolated acts of violence such as are inevitable among a nation half as big again as ours, but which have been generalized, multiplied and exaggerated to give the impression that Nazi rule is a bloodthirsty tyranny.

The German nation, moreover, was rapidly falling under the control of its alien elements. In the last days of the pre-Hitler regime there were twenty times as many Jewish Government officials in Germany as had existed before the war. Israelites of international attachments were insinuating themselves into key positions in the German administrative machine. Three German Ministers only had direct relations with the Press, but in each case the official responsible for conveying news and interpreting policy to the public was a Jew.

[ http://tinyurl.com/ypbsf ]

Rothermere died — some say of a broken heart — shortly after the second great Jew-instigated fratricidal European bloodbath began in 1939.

The life and death of Lord Northcliffe have left us many lessons. Chief among those lessons is this: The enemy with whom we deal has no honor and no concept whatsoever of a fair fight, whether in a shooting war or in the war of ideas. Dealing with them as we would deal with an opponent of our own race, observing the conventions of civility and fairness and an honorable contest — and expecting the same from them, will be fatal every time. What we can expect from them is a stab in the back; poisoning; paid betrayers; lies, lies, and more lies in every direction one turns, lies so thick that they multiply faster than one can respond to them; and destruction of a million innocent lives if it gets them one inch closer to their inhuman goals.

Zionists in their own words

David Cameron - illuminati Connection? Multi Culti psychopath? Communist?

No change then.

Watch the videos.

IMF fears 'social explosion' from world jobs crisis - Telegraph

Oh dear. 

To be on the safe side: buy some canned food, perhaps some method of cooking it (say a petrol stove), and something like a machete to defend yourself with. If you live in the US, you've probably done this if you're reading this blog. 

Daily Mail

We're reaching the end of the organised asset strip of the Western nations. The disintegration is happening. And right to the final crashing end, the gang of traitors will tell us that everything will be fine, we'll get back on track etc. That's as the £ loses value for trading with, and we see inflation eating away at the value of our money, the country is being filled to the neck with Islamists, Africans and other legal and illegal immigrants. 

There can be no recovery, because there is no manufacturing base left. There can be no recovery because the government has handed absolute control of the economy of Britain to the global International Finance capitalists. There can be no recovery because the most important enterprises in the British economy - the utilities - are in the hands of - well, who? Certainly not anyone in Britain, for sure.


We're in trouble. The politicians will do nothing, except increase the liberal-fascist-communist dictatorship, to control the social discontent, until they can cut and run.

IMF fears 'social explosion' from world jobs crisis

America and Europe face the worst jobs crisis since the 1930s and risk "an explosion of social unrest" unless they tread carefully, the International Monetary Fund has warned.

"The labour market is in dire straits. The Great Recession has left behind a waste land of unemployment," said Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the IMF's chief, at an Oslo jobs summit with the International Labour Federation (ILO).

He said a double-dip recession remains unlikely but stressed that the world has not yet escaped a deeper social crisis. He called it a grave error to think the West was safe again after teetering so close to the abyss last year. "We are not safe," he said.

A joint IMF-ILO report said 30m jobs had been lost since the crisis, three quarters in richer 


Oh dear. 
To be on the safe side: buy some canned food, perhaps some method of cooking it (say a petrol stove), and something like a machete to defend yourself with. If you live in the US, you've probably done this if you're reading this blog. economies. Global unemployment has reached 210m. "The Great Recession has left gaping wounds. High and long-lasting unemployment represents a risk to the stability of existing democracies," it said.

The study cited evidence that victims of recession in their early twenties suffer lifetime damage and lose faith in public institutions. A new twist is an apparent decline in the "employment intensity of growth" as rebounding output requires fewer extra workers. As such, it may be hard to re-absorb those laid off even if recovery gathers pace. The world must create 45m jobs a year for the next decade just to tread water.

Olivier Blanchard, the IMF's chief economist, said the percentage of workers laid off for long stints has been rising with each downturn for decades but the figures have surged this time.

"Long-term unemployment is alarmingly high: in the US, half the unemployed have been out of work for over six months, something we have not seen since the Great Depression," he said.

Spain has seen the biggest shock, with unemployment near 20pc. Britain's rate has risen from 5.3pc to 7.8pc over the last two years, a slightly better record than the OECD average. This contrasts with the 1970s and early 1980s when Britain was notoriously worse. UK jobless today totals 2.48m.

Mr Blanchard called for extra monetary stimulus as the first line of defence if "downside risks to growth materialise", but said authorities should not rule out another fiscal boost, despite de


Oh dear. 
To be on the safe side: buy some canned food, perhaps some method of cooking it (say a petrol stove), and something like a machete to defend yourself with. If you live in the US, you've probably done this if you're reading this blog. bt worries. "If fiscal stimulus helps avoid structural unemployment, it may actually pay for itself," he said.

"Most advanced countries should not tighten fiscal policies before 2011: tightening sooner could undermine recovery," said the report, rebuking Britain's Coalition, Germany's austerity hawks, and US Republicans. Under French socialist Strauss-Kahn, the IMF has assumed a Keynesian flavour.

The report skirts the contentious issue of whether globalisation lets companies engage in "labour arbitrage", locating plant in low-wage economies such as China to ship products back to the West. Nor does it grapple with the trade distortions caused by China's currency policy, except to call on "surplus countries" to play their part in rebalancing.

The IMF said there may be a link between rising inequality within Western economies and deflating demand.

Historians say the last time that the wealth gap reached such skewed extremes was in 1928-1929. Some argue that wealth concentration may cause investment to outstrip demand, leading to over-capacity. This can trap the world in a slump.

IMF fears 'social explosion' from world jobs crisis - Telegraph

2012. What a complete load of pagan bollocks.

The whole "2012" theorisation than there will be some great change to the planet for good or bad, on the 21st december 2012,  is  absolute bullshit. It is a rehash of the Y2K fear based crap, mainly to make MONEY.

There are also all kinds and types of pagans, New Agers, ecofascists and others who want to use this non-event to change your behaviour, to fitin with the many and varied future plans of the Powers That Be. . 

Express.co.uk - Home of the Daily and Sunday Express | UK News :: Britain now home to 4 million immigrants

The government is allowing the immigrants in. 

Purposefully.

The purpose  behind this conspiracy fact is multi faceted:

(1) To create social strife, allowing restrictive laws to counteract our Magna Charta rights, and subvert the Bill of Rights

(2) To keep wages low

(3) To act as a militia for the government if or more likely when their system should slide into disintergeneration

(4) To replace by displacement - financially, socially, economically - the present indigenous population of Celtic & Anglo Saxon peoples. 

Daily Express:

MORE than four million foreign nationals now live in Britain – nearly seven per cent of the population, according to the latest official statistics.

The UK is one of the most sought after destinations in Europe for immigrants. Only Germany and Spain have a larger number of foreign citizens.

In contrast, Poland, Romania, Bulgaria and Slovakia have less than one per centof their populations made up of foreign nationals.

Yesterday Labour’s shambolic immigration policy was blamed for opening the floodgates.

And critics said the official figures for UK immigrants had been “wildly underestimated”.

Figures released by the EU’s statistical office, Eurostat, reveals that 4,020,800 foreign citizens are living in the UK.

More than 2.4 million came from countries outside the EU while around 1.6 million originated from member states.

Figures show that on January 1 2009, more than seven million foreign citizens were living in Germany while Spain was home to 5.6 million – more than 12 per cent of its population.

Britain was followed closely by France and Italy, both with just under four million immigrants.

Last night UKIP party chairman Paul Nuttall said: “Of course Britain is a place where people want to come and live and I would say this is a massive underestimate. The figures are questionable because we do not control our borders.”

Immigration Minister Damian Green pledged to tackle the crisis inherited by the coalition Government.

He said: “This Government is taking a much tougher approach to immigration.

“We will reduce net migration to the levels of the Nineties – the tens of thousands rather than the hundreds of thousands we have seen in recent years.

“And we will take tough action to remove those who have no right to be here by enforcing returns and beefing up the protection of our border with a new border police force.”

The latest figures were published as the Government revealed it cost taxpayers £28million last year to deport failed asylum seekers and immigration offenders.

More than £10million was spent hiring private jets and a further £18million on scheduled flights.

A total of £109.9million has been spent on flights deporting illegal immigrants from the UK over the past five years.

The latest figures, released by Mr Green in a parliamentary written answer, were higher than at any point since 2005, when the Government spent a total of £17.2million.

A total of 67,215 people were removed or departed voluntarily from the UK last year, down one per cent from 2008, Home Office figures have revealed.

Express.co.uk - Home of the Daily and Sunday Express | UK News :: Britain now home to 4 million immigrants