Jews were at the very centre of the Slave Trade. Where's *their* guilt?

Whoever else was to blame for slavery, for both Protestants and Romanists were up to their elbows, Jews were ar the very centre of the Black Slave Trade.

It's about time Jews explain their role in history, not the Holocaust, we've already been bored tit less with that, but things such as the Slave Trade, where they should have to grovel and beg forgiveness from the groups they have abused for profit.

Just like white people are made to do.

Wealthy banker and wife want no rules on adoption. Yes, let's just flood the UK with thousands more immigrants, shall we?

I detest white, self hating, liberal, wealthy people. As individuals they mean well, but really, if they want to help the third world, why not just cash in the house, investments etc and go to the third world and give them their money, and then live in the same grinding poverty as the Mexican peons and the poor of the Barrios of Brazil? Why do they have to drag the rest of us into the mire of sanctimonious do-gooding?

This story is just one tiny facet of the stupidity, self centered and self congratulating liberalism that is wrecking the Western nations. Crap like this - green issues, gender politics, race awareness, equality campaigns - rolls on, and on, and on, and on, and on.....

There are tens of thousands of WHITE CHILDREN rotting in  the rape and murder centres that pass for local authority care in the UK. Why not adopt one of them, eh? A white child, with loving white adoptive parents - what a beautiful scene.

The council in question is right. Black children belong to the black community, and should be raised by their own people in their own ways. They should be encouraged to adopt black children more frequently. 

Too white to adopt: Politically-correct town hall officials tell banker and his wife they can't give a home to a black or Asian child

Cradling her daughter on her knee, Francesca Polini is every inch the loving, caring mother.

She and her banker husband have good incomes, a spacious home and a close network of family and friends. But their hopes of parenthood were ini­tially dashed when town hall bureaucrats said they were ‘too white’ to adopt a child.

Their rejection meant a child in care was denied the chance of a happy, com­fortable home and a stable future. And it casts a spotlight on a politically correct adoption system which routinely blocks white couples from giving a home to a child in need.

Mrs Polini, 40, and her husband Rick offered to adopt a black or Asian child, who wait longer for adoption because of a national shortage of ethnic minority couples looking to adopt.

But the couple claim officials in Ealing, West London, told them there was a cap on white parents adopting black or Asian children.

Officially, the council denies such a cap exists, but the case echoes those of other white, middle-class couples who have been barred from adopting for the same reason. Mrs Polini said: ‘The woman didn’t even meet us, she just told us on the phone, “I’m afraid you are too white for us to permit you to adopt one of our children”.

‘There was no assessment, it was based purely on our skin colour, and that shouldn’t be what quali­fies you to adopt. None of this is about the child’s best interests and frankly it’s immoral.’

Faced with their local authori­ty’s refusal to consider them as adoptive parents, the couple had to search abroad for a child to adopt.

Ironically, the same council which had refused their applica­tion to adopt a British child was happy to charge more than £4,000 to vet them for interna­tional adoption.

After overcoming a series of bureaucratic hurdles, they eventu­ally won permission to adopt a girl in Mexico. Gaia, now two, was granted British citizenship last year, and her parents hope to adopt a second child from Mexico.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1306887/White-couple-told-adopt-black-Asian-child.html#ixzz0xrz1TY3l

Oh good. A second alien child into the UK. Just what we need. 

Settle down, watch the clips, learn. Youtube: "Why I hate the Sixties"

The Sixties were about money, perversion, depravity, and revolution. It's how the Communists gained power in the Western countries. It was all a lie, and we are living with the consequences.

The Zionist Matrix of Power in America

It is as true in Britain, Holland, Germany, France, Denmark, Sweden, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Canada.

Can you imagine for one moment a Jewish Hanukkah celebration being renamed by a local authority like Birmingham, in the way they have attempted repeatedly tried with Christmas to "Winterval" to avoid upsetting non Christians ? 

Jews: a race or ideology?

Just watch the video.

Thousamd will arrive, thousands upon thousands, and the Supreme Court members will get more Police protection.

Abdul and Rafiq can't believe how helpful the Police at Calais are, knowing their Civil Partnership registration in Britain won't be delayed by paperwork or questions any longer, thanks to the UK Supreme Court.

Straight from the horses arse: 

The Supreme Court has ruled that two gay men from Iran and Cameroon have the right to asylum in the UK.

The pair took their cases to the court after being told by the Home Office they could safely return home if they were "discreet" about their sexual orientation.

The Cameroonian man, HT, argued he was told he could be sent home despite being attacked after he was seen kissing his partner.

The Iranian man, HJ, was told by a tribunal that he must expect persecution for his homosexuality and could avoid it by being discreet.

Lord Hope, who read out the judgment, said: "To compel a homosexual person to pretend that his sexuality does not exist or suppress the behaviour by which to manifest itself is to deny him the fundamental right to be who he is."

An earlier Court of Appeal decision said the government could return the pair to their home countries on the basis that they could be discreet, despite homosexuality being illegal in both countries and HT suffering violence from his neighbours.

The case was brought on behalf of the men by the London office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.

The men's lawyer, Iona Harding, of Baker & McKenzie, said: "This is an excellent result which will ensure that lesbian, gay and bisexual people receive the protection they are entitled to as refugees in the UK and are not expected to hide their identity in order to escape execution, long prison sentences or other forms of persecution."

Gay asylum campaigner Paul Canning told PinkNews.co.uk that the decision had "extremely broad implications" for gay asylum seekers in other countries due to the EU trying to bring standardise asylum policy.

He added: "This is a clear victory. It is one in the eye for the last government."

The court's judgment said that the term "concealment" was preferred to discretion, as this recognises that gay people in homophobic countries may need to be dishonest about their sexuality and that the average person would find it intolerable to have to conceal their sexuality for fear of persecution.

It added that UK authorities must consider whether asylum applicants have to conceal their sexuality at home for fear of persecution and if so, they should be given refugee status regardless of whether they can successfully keep their sexuality secret.

The coalition government has said it will introduce new rules to prevent the deportation of any gay asylum seeker who faces "imprisonment, torture or execution" if sent home.

Neither HT or HJ were at risk of torture or execution and neither said they had been imprisoned.

Home secretary Theresa May said: "I welcome the ruling of the Supreme Court, which vindicates the position of the coalition government.

"We have already promised to stop the removal of asylum seekers who have had to leave particular countries because their sexual orientation or gender identification puts them at proven risk of imprisonment, torture or execution.

"I do not believe it is acceptable to send people home and expect them to hide their sexuality to avoid persecution.

"From today, asylum decisions will be considered under the new rules and the judgment gives an immediate legal basis for us to reframe our guidance for assessing claims based on sexuality, taking into account relevant country guidance and the merits of each individual case.

"We will, of course, take any decisions on a case-by-case basis looking at the situation in the country of origin and the merits of individual cases in line with our commitment."

Every street in the land is to be filled to the brim with anyone who CLAIMS to be a queer, pooftah, shirtlifter, left footer, dyke, lezza or bumchum, because you an bet that this decision has gone double quick time along the jungle telegraph to each and every part of the world. 

This is no accident. This is no chance happening, not a rogue opinion. This spiteful, purposeful and meant to hammer at the indigenous Caucasian population of Britain. Unemployment stands at 2,500,000. Housing is in dire short supply. Public services are already to be cut by 20% or more. So who will lose out? 

Not the Moslem, the West African, the Gypsy. Not the Jew, not the Lesbian, not the child molester. 

These group above represent the protected "minority" who have and always have the first middle and last call on any public service or assistance because they scream DISCRIMINATION! HATER! BIGOT!

And now were officially importing more . Not content with ENDLESSLY INCREASING  the Islamist battle cry, the Call to Prayer, the Moldovan Child Porn and Prostitution racketeer, the Hindu Temple and the Negroid Drug Dealer, we now appear not to have enough homosexuals and lesbians, to drain away whatever public services are left to us when the International Military Industrial Complex has HAD IT'S LATEST BAIL OUT. 

Those who the gods wish to destroy, he first makes mad.

Black Councillor spews racial hatred in Bristol.

Guardian 28th June 2010

Councillor found guilty of racial harassment over 'coconut' jibe

Shirley Brown, the first black Liberal Democrat elected to Bristol city council, called Asian opponent a 'coconut' during heated debate, court told

Shirley Brown, 48, the first black Liberal Democrat elected to Bristol city council, who employed the term about a Conservative, Jay Jethwa, denied committing an offence.

 Vicious bigot, Shirley Brown (above)

Bristol magistrates court heard the term was used to accuse someone of betraying their heritage by pandering to white opinion, just as a coconut was brown on the outside but white in the middle.

She was given a 12-month conditional discharge and ordered to pay £620 in costs. The chairman of the bench, Simon Cooper, told her the remark had been "purely gratuitous" and could have stimulated racial hatred.

 Innocent victim of racial harrasment, Cllr Jay Jethwa

Bristol magistrates court heard the term was used to accuse someone of betraying their heritage by pandering to white opinion, just as a coconut was brown on the outside but white in the middle.

She was given a 12-month conditional discharge and ordered to pay £620 in costs. The chairman of the bench, Simon Cooper, told her the remark had been "purely gratuitous" and could have stimulated racial hatred.

"You made a mistake for which you have to accept responsibility," he added. "It is a sad case."

Brown's remark came as she argued against a Conservative attempt in February 2009 to cut funds to the council's Legacy Commission, established in 2008, the year after the bicentenary of the abolition of the slave trade in the British empire.

"You made a mistake for which you have to accept responsibility," he added. "It is a sad case."

Brown's remark came as she argued against a Conservative attempt in February 2009 to cut funds to the council's Legacy Commission, established in 2008, the year after the bicentenary of the abolition of the slave trade in the British empire.

Of course, had a white man called the Councillor who has been in prosecuted a sooty, coon, wog or darkie, you can bet they would right now been rotting in a prison cell, career and like in tatters. 

Councillor Jethwa's great error was to suggest cuts to the feather bedding and make work schemes of the communists. She further -in ignorance or not - challenged the necessity  of another self flagellation session over the past historyof White wealthy power elites, paid for and watched by the white working class.  

In the seventies, when I was a child, the "Black Soilidarity Movement" represented all those who were not Caucasian, did it with panache (google Toxteth Riot, Brixton Riot etc). 

This is a first glimmer that ther "solidarity" is beginning to break down.

Of the millions of immigrants who have come to Britain, who still complains and whines about racism? If  you go into the council offices, who still appears to be there to "fill the (State created and enforced) ethnic mix"?

There are only two groups - Afro Carribeans, and Moslems. Everyone else seems, for good or bad, to have merely subsumed into the great stew of life. Perhaps the majority - Sikhs, Hindus, Nepalese, Poles etc are just too busy working and living, building for the future, enjoying the park, watching movies, buying Mars bars.