Savages riot in London, Manchester, Liverpool and Birmingham.

How Britain was, and should be again. A see of British faces, 1900. 

The outcome of mass immigration, the desperate liberal attempt at creating a multicultural society has fallen flat on it's arse once again. 

Enoch Powell told us, in plain English, what would come to pass. He was only wrong in his timing. Hordes of Immigrants, and the children of immigrants, with white youth blindly following,  following their coat-tails, are right now destroying the towns and cities of England. And that was the very purpose of their invitation in the first place: the destruction of all that was, and is, Britain. 

We have little or no Law with which to combat this: the Police have been ruined with "sensitivity training" and  "multicultural training" , and the punishments which will be imposed are a joke, with accommodation of the quality of a three star hotel. 

This has to be the last time. 
The corrupt dog and pony show which passes for government has to be swept away from their positions of power. They have consistently lied about the number of immigrants, the worthwhileness of immigration, and the outcome of immigration: they would have you believe that everything to do with immigration has just been peachy, a great success, and, basically, anyone who disagrees is just a nasty old hater. These scum have sold my, and my children's, birthright. They have handed my nation to a vicious barbaric and savage horde. 
But then the government is operated and owned by scum that can simply - up sticks and piss off abroad, if the shit hits the fan, can't they? They also ALWAYS get protection from the Law and the Police, and if necessary  - the Army. 
Law must be once again returned to the streets. The government is UNFIT, so we must take power and restore it. 
The flogging post, the gallows, the treadmill - all must return. The corrupt political appointments who pass for magistrates and judges must be hauled away and we must dispense Justice. 
Most importantly - each and every immigrant must be removed back to their place of origin. 

Keiser Report: Exorbitant Privilege (Russia Today)

Britain and the US are in a mess, and it is much the same mess, and a good indicator of where we are is seen by looking towards the USA.

The British people entered WW2 with the worlds greatest Empire, the world's greatest Navy, and was still in the top three manufacturing powers.

By 1945, Great Britain was bust. Bankrupt. 

In the past fifty years, both the US and UK have removed the VAST majority of MANUFACTURING to China, India Brazil and other gutters of the Third World, and replaced that with - what? IT, Finance and Investments, and retail, much of it garbage low paid work, leaving the people with nothing to spend on anything but what they NEED, not what they want.

Five years. The present recession started in 2008..... watch the video ....

My God, we're in real trouble.

Keiser Report: Ghettofication of America, via Russia Today

This is a really good episode, Keiser's guest in the second half of the show is superb.

The British Establishment is as depraved and deluded as that of Nero and Caligula.

Malcolm McDowell as Caligula

This is an interesting reply to a comment, from the author of a blog post at Occidental dissent. The post is interesting too, and well worth a read.  

Hunter Wallace says:July 26, 2011 at 4:44 pm Nero wasn’t nearly as deluded as David Cameron.
Among the Ancients, there were individual emperors who were moral degenerates or who were crazy (Caligula and Nero being the most famous examples), but Roman society was too reality based to succumb to fantasy ideology.
Back then people could see that Nero was crazy and out of control. Now, thanks to fantasy ideology, which pervades entire societies thanks to television and movies, and the general detachment of “symbolic engineers” in office parks from the physical creation of wealth, lunatics can sound completely normal and mainstream.
Compare David Cameron to Nero. The former thinks that Muslims can successfully be integrated into British society. Nero plan’s was to weep before his enemies in order to impress them.
What about Caligula’s great victory over Poseidon? Isn’t that like LBJ’s War on Poverty?

Fleet Street swings behing the new Elite meme: Moslems are peace loving beatnicks, the "right wing extremists" are the real danger (now).

The governments of western Europe have carried out endless acts of treason against their own people for at least 100 years. Their actions have been in direct opposition to the good of their own people, to their national interest, and more broadly to the world (actions cause reactions).

An Elite of European based, globalist, internationalist, liberal-fascistic political psychopaths have used war - 1914 - 18, 1939 - 45, the Cold War, Afghanistan in the eighties, Gulf war I and II, now the destabilisation in the Mediterranean and Levant - and global structures based around NATO and the UN - to create what has always been the dream of Elitists : a  New World Order, risen from the ashes of chaos they themselves have created.

PROBLEM - REACTION - SOLUTION.




Watch the video:

"The oligarchs - and a few lawyers and priests and so forth who lived on them - are the lords of the earth. Everything exists for their benefit. The ordinary people, the workers - are their slaves. They could do what they liked with you. They could ship you off to Canada like cattle. They could sleep with your daughters if they chose. They could order you to be flogged with something called a cat-o'-nine tails. You had to take your cap off when you passed them. Every oligarch went about with a gang of lackeys. Salvation Army, Roman Catholics, Jews, Indians - and other sorts - were lackeys, parasites, flunkies of the ruling class."

 http://www.orwelltoday.com/rulers.shtml

The media have begun to spin this - after false start - and are whipping up the same kind of fears that were so succesful after 9/11 and 7/7. The boogiemen now, of course, are not Moslems - brutal and vicious as they are, were mere patsies in the grand scheme of 9/11 and 7/7 - but white European "right wing extremists". 

The largest section of the RECORDS DEPARTMENT, far larger than the one on which Winston worked, consisted simply of persons whose duty it was to track down and collect all copies of books, newspapers, and other documents which had been superseded and were due for destruction. The hunting-down and destruction of books had been done with thoroughness and it was very unlikely that there existed anywhere in Oceania a copy of a book printed earlier than 1960. Books were recalled and rewritten again and again, and were invariably re issued without any admission that any alteration had been made. Even the written instructions never stated or implied that an act of forgery was to be committed: always reference was to slips, errors, misprints, or misquotations which it was necessary to put right in the interests of accuracy. But actually it was not even forgery. It was merely the substitution of one piece of nonsense for another. Statistics were just as much a fantasy in their original version as in their rectified version. A great deal of the time you were expected to make them up out of your head.
http://www.orwelltoday.com/past.shtml

The Elite merely creates the new meme, their fellows in the media publicise and propagate it, it becomes accepted, the past forgotten. 

From the website of the BNP:

Norway – The double standards of the Marxist Liberals
By Maid of Kent – After the shocking massacre committed last Friday in Norway by fanatic Anders Behring Breivik, the Marxist ‘Liberal’-dominated media in Britain have had a field day in their attempts to connect Breivik to ‘far-right’ groups in the UK. Naming these groups as the EDL and with no evidence to support their claims, including the name of the British National Party in their biased articles and news reports, the Marxist ‘Liberal’ media reveals a blatant attempt to blacken the name of the British National Party and associate us with the monstrous crime committed by Breivik.
With the inference that these ‘far-right’ groups are extremists, the mainstream media conveniently ignores the fact that the policies of the British National Party are not ‘far right’ by any measure, and, before the decades of forced cultural Marxism, our policies were considered normal commonsense measures necessary for the preservation and health of our nation and people and were actively pursued by the Lib/Lab/Con parties themselves.
Their evil attempt to associate the British National Party with a mass murderer in order to brainwash their audience into thinking that our party and its members and supporters are all willing and capable of emulating these wicked deeds reveals the determination of the Marxist ‘Liberal’ establishment to destroy any legal and valid opposition to their unpopular and destructive policies.
Perhaps the most revealing aspect of the Marxist ‘Liberal’ media reports and the response from the Lib/Lab/Cons and their associated political parties in occupied Europe is their condemnation of all Nationalist parties and movements throughout Europe, linking us all to extremists and terrorists and, in an article in the Daily Mail, even to German Nazis.
As any reasonable and unbiased person will know, Nationalism is not about far-right or far-left politics, or any politics in between. Nationalism is the wish to preserve your people and their culture and traditions and to see your people live in peace and prosperity in their homeland.
This is not an unreasonable wish and appears to be acceptable to the Marxist ‘Liberals’ where non-European countries are involved, but becomes unacceptable to them when we demand the same.
However, the most breathtaking hypocrisy is revealed by the Marxist ‘Liberal’ reaction to this horrific massacre in Norway compared to their reaction to similar terrorist massacres perpetuated by Muslim murderers.
While the mainstream media has invited opinion from every hysterical Marxist Liberal it can find to denounce the ‘evil’ Nationalist movements of Europe who refuse to see their countries and indigenous people subjected to mass invasion by people from alien and incompatible cultures, after the London tube and bus bombings in 2005, this same Marxist Liberal elite bleated that ‘we’ had to find a way to ‘open up a dialogue’ with the races and cultures that had produced the terrorist murderers to try to prevent similar events in the future.
With no hysterical condemnation of these alien invaders from incompatible cultures, who seek to change the British way of life through force and terror, but instead seeking to cravenly capitulate to their unacceptable demands by attempting to blame the invaded native population for not managing to ‘open dialogues’ and ‘finding ways to accommodate’ these invaders, the Marxist Liberal elite reveal their true aims and intentions, which are to suppress any indigenous dissent and to support the destruction of our native peoples and cultures by enforced mass immigration.
While Breivik is undoubtedly mentally unstable, more than possibly as a result of his Marxist-mandated unstable childhood – a childhood inflicted on millions of other Europeans in order to destroy our societies – this instability was no doubt intensified by a seething anger at what had happened to his homeland as a result of the European elitist plan to destroy the countries and people of Europe through the mass immigration of people from alien and incompatible cultures.
That many other native Europeans feel a similar seething anger has been ignored by the European elite and their political parties who force their perverted ideology and nation-destroying policies upon us.
Will these same political parties, including the Lib/Lab/Cons, seek to ‘open a dialogue’ with the disaffected and marginalized indigenous Europeans whom they have ignored for decades in order to prevent similar atrocities in the future? Will they attempt to ‘find ways to accommodate’ the wishes of the people that they were supposed to represent all along?
Don’t hold your breath. It’s one rule for the unwanted invading immigrants and another rule for the rightful inhabitants of Europe – the European people.
On the contrary, instead of seeking to open dialogue and finding ways to accommodate the wishes of the majority of native Europeans, these European elites and their political parties like the Lib/Lab/Cons seek to destroy legitimate and peaceful opposition to their policies by demonising Nationalist parties like the British National Party by attempting to associate us with despicable murderers like Breivik.



http://www.bnp.org.uk/news/norway-–-double-standards-marxist-liberals

Norway killings being used to push Multicultural policy of the Frankfurt School's Culturalist Marxists.

D'oh! The Cops in Norway knew the killers name BEFORE his arrest:

Despite being portrayed by the media as inept due to the length of time it took them to reach the island of Utoeya, it has now emerged that police knew the name of gunman Anders Behring Breivik before they even arrested him, a startling admission that prompted one of Britain’s top news anchors to question how authorities were aware of the gunman’s identity in advance.
During his Channel 4 News broadcast on Friday evening, host Jon Snow asked “why police knew the killer’s name by the time they had arrived on the island,” reported the Telegraph live blog.
“He surrendered the moment police called his name 3 minutes after they arrived. What we don’t know is how the police knew the terrorist’s name before they arrested him,” said Snow, who is recognized as one of Britain’s most trusted news anchors, and cannot be dismissed as a “conspiracy theorist”.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/police-knew-gunmans-name-before-arrest.html

They haven't been able to make Multiculturalism work spontaneously, in the Western nations, so now these terrible State organised and controlled actions in Norway are going to be the lynch-pin to forcing acceptance of Multiculturalism, with the fear of being seen as a "Terrorist", "Nazi" or potential murderer. 
This whole conspiracy is to switch the fear rhetoric of the tyrannous scum who operate Western governments, from Islamic terrorism (tired, wearing thin) , to "Homegrown" terrorism (the terrorists are everywhere, you can't identify them etc). ID cards, more CCTV, longer holding by the Police without charge blah blah blah ..... The Sky News reports that the Police (front men for MI5) are already attacking legitimate political organisations in the UK: 

Scotland Yard's counter terrorism chief, assistant commissioner Cressida Dick, has been requested to supply specialist officers to join a new European task force dedicated to investigating European-wide far right links to a bomb attack in Oslo and a shooting spree on Utoya Island.
http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/World-News/Norway-Metropolitan-Police-To-Join-European-Wide-Force-Probing-Far-Right-Links-Of-Attacks-Suspect/Article/201107416036718?f=rss

His handlers in MOSSAD/CIA/MI6 couldn't even be bothered to create a "new" backstory for this patsy.

The 32 year-old appears to have quoted verbatim large sections from the preaching of Theodore Kaczynski in his 1500 page online rant.Breivik had “copied and pasted” almost a dozen key passages from the 69 year-old’s 35,000 manifesto, only changing particular words such as “leftist” with “cultural Marxist”.It remains unclear what his motivations were, but experts said it appeared he had taken “inspiration” from Kaczynski whose two decade parcel-bomb terror campaign killed three people and 29 injured others.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/norway/8658269/Norway-shooting-Anders-Behring-Breivik-plagiarised-Unabomber.html

They just rehashed someone else's ramblings. 

The whole story stinks: 

Given the fact that the establishment media got it spectacularly wrong by instantly jumping to the conclusion that Friday’s deadly attack in Norway was the work of Al-Qaeda Muslims, placing complete trust in the details emerging about gunman Anders Behring Breivik would be foolish, especially since there are innumerable inconsistencies and contradictions that need to be studied before a fuller picture of what motivated the bloodshed can be established.
The rush to blame Muslims for the carnage, hastily parroted by an onslaught of mainstream “terror experts,” was a startling insight into how the propaganda that fuels the war on terror is so unquestionably bounced around the echo chamber of the corporate media.
It’s also a reminder that the mainstream press instantly falls in line with whoever the establishment designates the enemy du jour to be at any given time. Now that Muslims have been so vehemently demonized as terrorists, it’s the turn of so called “right-wing extremists,” or anyone who disagrees with mass immigration, loss of sovereignty and globalist financial looting, to feel the heat.
The effort to smear European conservatives as unhinged radicals who harbor simmering urges for bloodlust is now in full swing, and it’s a demonization campaign firmly founded on the carefully crafted public portrayal of Anders Behring Breivik.

However, it’s quickly becoming apparent that just as many eyewitnesses reported two gunmen on the island where the rampage unfolded, there are two different personas behind Breivik himself.
Indeed, there are two different Facebook profiles for Breivik, one from before the massacre and one from after. The latter profile appears to have been embellished and deliberately altered to emphasize the notion that the gunman was motivated by his “Christian conservative” beliefs.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/anders-behring-breivik-manufacturing-a-patsy.html

Press TV, mouthpiece of the Islamic Theocracy of Iran, which really is a rather nasty vicious little State run by theological psychopaths, , is cock-a-hoop: 

Islam, and their useful white European idiots (such as this "Peter Ruston/ Chris Bamberry pairing in the video above)  are now empowered by the Elites to scream Hate, and Terrorist, at any disagreement with Islamic theological stances, and with attempting to turn the savage barbarian tide away from European shores. 
White people of Europe are in real trouble, worse than they have EVER been. rememberer: these hate ridden bastards - useful idiots of the Western oligarchies, are the true face of Islam. People in Europe aren't frightened of Islamics and Islam for reasons of terrorism,but because of the murder and mayhem prevalent in whatever society Islam gains control of. They need to go from Europe by choice or force. They do not belong here, any more than white folk belong in Iran, Saudi Arabia or Syria. 

Anyhow: these are interesting alternative media takes on the situation of the shooter and Norway:  : 

http://classicalvalues.com/2011/07/not-civilians-but-traitors-to-be-executed/

http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2011/07/25/knights-templar-honesty-and-hypocrisy/

http://thebuckshotter.blogspot.com/2011/07/oslo-bomber-is-freemason-and-zionist.html

Max Keiser - a neo-feudal future for Europe, and the world.

The great sale of of the nations of Europe's assets is starting. This has been caused to happen and brought to be by a gang of financial terrorists, based in Wall Street and the City of London. And it's a pennies on the pound sale   
I hope you've purchased some silver if not gold. 

Freedom and liberty in the UK press is dying.

Comment: I am CERTAIN that in the near future there will be "privacy" legislation, which will be the start of a Department of Censorship, no doubt known as MiniTruth to anyone who has read 1984. It will ostensibly be there to protect the families of murdered schoolchildren, maimed ex soldiers, and others whose private grief shouldn't be impinged upon. 

However this will not really exist for this purpose but to protect the WEALTHY, the POWERFUL, and the WICKED from the press. It will make such items as the recent superinjunction affair, involving Members of Parliament, dolly bird chasing  Footballers etc. much more difficult for the UK press to report. 

But this is not the MAJOR reason for the Fall of the House of Murdoch. 

There is a great deal of worthwhile speculation in this piece, and I highly recommend the blog from which I republish this from, if you want to see the filthy, depraved real world of political activity in the UK. 

World’s End Shouldn’t Cost Freedom of the Presshttp://order-order.com/2011/07/10/worlds-end-shouldnt-cost-freedom-of-the-press/

Guido has read the News of the World since he was a paperboy in West London over 30 years ago. Those who don’t read it think “The Screws” is all titillation, randy vicars and soap stars. It is that and also great popular campaigning journalism at its best, reflecting the concerns of people other than Islington Indy readers.
Politicians, the corrupt and evil feared it, today is a good day for them. Unfortunately when the drive to get the story crossed over into illegally hacking the phones of victims of tragedies, the good guys became bad guys. It has always been the case that the best stories often have a dubious legal provenance involving deception, subterfuge or law breaking, that is done to get at the truth that wrongdoers are hiding. Investigative journalists everywhere, including this blog, do it because it is the only way to get the truth. Using the dark arts to sell more newspapers with ghoulish tales is, as many have said, disgusting and unacceptable.Momentum is building for press regulation, politicians of all parties are keen to tame the feral press. Public opinion is shifting towards them. This would be a mistake. The rich and the powerful in this country would like nothing better than to have a craven and beholden press. In many countries this is exactly what they have and ordinary people are worse off for it. Privacy laws are a trojan horse for censorship.Privacy from intrusion by the state or journalists who break the law by stealing photographs, hacking, climbing over the wall into your back garden, that should be protected. Privacy laws should not be a means to hide embarrassment for those who can afford to hire Schillings. That way lies an untouchable ruling elite.In the end Murdoch closed the News of the World because he feared an advertiser and consumer boycott (plus to try take the heat off the Sky takeover). If you disapprove of a newspaper don’t buy and read it. That is simply the most powerful restraint you have on newspaper proprietors in a free democracy. Even Rupert Murdoch fears his customers.Restrictive press laws will be circumvented in the borderless internet age, however Guido would rather not have to try to expensively fight the good fight from permanently offshore. Meantime Guido wishes both his friends and enemies at The Screws the best of luck for the future. Oh, and thanks for paying the kids’ school fees.

Murdoch: why hasn't Jerusalem, or Wall St. and the City of London saved him?

With thanks to aangirfan (blog - much better than mine - LINK here)  for making me think.

THE ZIONIST JEWS and their European, White acolytes OWN AND OPERATE THE MEDIA ACROSS the USA & MUCH OF THE WORLD. They admit so themselves.
 
Watch the video:

So one would imagine that Murdoch, had things been been flowing in their usual way, Rupert's Zionist pals in London and Washington could have pulled his fat from the fire.

But they didn't, even though they could, did they......

Further to my post, "There's something bigger with Murdoch than a few hurt feelings", here's something intersting from a Jewish author, which I hope you find useful in understanding the depth of anger felt by SOMEONE toward Murdoch for SOMETHING he has said or done.  

 

http://www.lobelog.com/pro-israel-groups-mute-on-murdoch/

Israeli Press Mum on Murdoch

July 12th, 2011

Marsha B. Cohen

On July 10, Anshel Pfeffer, a columnist for Israel’s reputedly most liberal news site,  Haaretz, wrote a straightforward, if scathing, news article about the accusations being levied against media mogul Rupert Murdoch. Pfeffer’s acerbic piece, aptly headlined “Shameful Journalism Puts Murdoch’s U.K. Empire at Risk,” like others making the front pages of newspapers and websites around the world, criticized the shady news gathering techniques engaged in by News of the World, a British division of Murdoch’s News International:

    "No one is coming out of this story looking good. Not the reporters and the editors of the News of the World newspaper, who hired a private detective to “hack” into the mobile phone messages of the subjects of their investigations – actors, celebrities, footballers, but also families who lost soldiers in wars and victims of murder. Certainly not the top brass of Rupert Murdoch’s News International, who pushed the Sunday tabloid into the murky depths of the journalism swamp, chasing down sensationalist headlines and higher sales.

    The power of the News International empire – which in Britain controls not just the tabloid with the biggest circulation, The Sun, but also “institutional” papers The Times and Sunday Times, as well as the BSkyB satellite television channels – was so extensive that, when the police caught a glimpse of the phone hacking affair more than five years ago, a decision was made that there were more important issues to investigate."

Pfeffer’s piece was yanked off the Haaretz English website after less than 24 hours, where many older pieces often linger for days, even weeks. Equally noteworthy is that  the article is now very difficult  to locate in the Haaretz archives. Querying the Haaretz website search box for “Murdoch” or “Pfeffer,” the default “sort by relevance” results bury Pfeffer’s article about Murdoch, which can be located easily only if searching by date.

Haaretz’s generally slipshod archiving of its published articles is irritating to researchers and writers, and is particularly unfortunate for a newspaper whose English language edition is published in coordination with the International Herald Tribune. The most interesting and provocative articles seem to be most difficult to find and to have the shortest shelf life, sometimes vanishing in a matter of hours. (This author learned long ago to print out any item  of interest appearing on the Haaretz site before it disappeared.)

Israel’s other English language news sites thus far have been offering no original commentary about Murdoch, and providing only reports or brief excerpts from wire service coverage. Curiously, neither Pfeffer nor the wire service reports point out that Murdoch is considered staunchly “pro-Israel.” In the past two years, Murdoch has been an honoree of at least two prominent  pro-Israel groups in the U.S. .

On March 4, 2009, the American Jewish Committee (AJC) presented Murdoch with its “National Human Relations Award.” (This author posted this detail in a reader comment to Pfeffer’s piece that Haaretz chose not to publish just prior to the article’s disappearance,  and also pointed it out in an e-mail to Pfeffer himself, to which he has not replied.) Speaking at the AJC awards dinner, Murdoch refuted the widely-believed myth that he himself  is Jewish, but took the opportunity to reiterate and endorse some other myths prevalent in the Jewish community:

    "In Europe, men and woman who bear the tattoos of concentration camps today look out on a continent where Jewish lives and Jewish property are under attack – and public debate is poisoned by an anti-Semitism we thought had been dispatched to history’s dustbin.

    In Iran, we see a regime that backs Hezbollah and Hamas now on course to acquire a nuclear weapon.

    In India, we see Islamic terrorists single out the Mumbai Jewish Center in a well-planned and well-coordinated attack that looks like it could be a test run for similar attacks in similar cities around the world."

On the first point, Murdoch ignored the inconvenient truth that the resurgence of European anti-Semitism has proceeded in tandem with European Islamophobia. Less than six months before Murdoch received his AJC award, the 2008 Pew Survey of Global Attitudes had revealed that Islamophia and anti-Semitism were both on the rise in Europe. As Ian Traynor of the Guardian noted at the time, “The survey found that suspicion of Muslims in Europe was considerably higher than hostility to Jews, but that the increase in antisemitism had taken place much more rapidly.” The rise in European anti-Semitism is a byproduct of Islamophobia at least as much as (and perhaps more than) it is a consequence of it.

Debate over whether or not Iran is seeking a nuclear weapon receives ample coverage on this blog and elsewhere, and elaboration of this issue would be a digression from the topic at hand. Suffice it to say that Murdoch (or any other speaker) could not, and would not dare to, address a Jewish group, particularly one that devotes so much of its abundant resources to anti-Iran rhetoric as AJC, without invoking “the Iranian threat.”

Murdoch’s mention of the attack on the Chabad House in Mumbai, India strongly implied  that the Jewish house of workshop had been singled out for an Islamist terrorist attack. At least 150 people were killed and hundreds more injured in a series of coordinated terrorist attacks Nov. 26-28, 2008, on a crowded train station, two luxury hotels popular with foreign tourists, a hospital and several other crowded Mumbai sites, with the Chabad House an apparent afterthought. The initial Fox News report did not even refer to the Chabad House as having been a target. Murdoch’s AJC speech also didn’t mention that Mumbai has nine synagogues attended almost exclusively by locals, which were not attacked; the only one targeted by the terrorists was the Chabad center, which was both run and frequented by foreigner visitors from Israel and Western countries.

Not to be outdone, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) chose Murdoch as the recipient of its “International Leadership Award” on Oct. 13, 2010, which was presented to him by ADL Director Abraham Foxman:

    “I have come to know the man, not his image,” Mr. Foxman said in presenting the award to Mr. Murdoch.  “I learned that he cared deeply about the safety and security of Israel.  I learned that he was as distressed as I was about efforts to delegitimize the Jewish state, to hold it to a double standard, and to seek its demise by some.”

In his acceptance speech (reproduced in full by the arch-neoconservative Weekly Standard, which Murdoch’s NewsCorp had helped to get off the ground and had run at a loss for 14 years before selling it in 2009 to Philip Anschutz), Murdoch blamed anti-Semitism on Muslims, and leftists for the “soft war” being waged against Israel, conflating criticism with armed assault:

    Now the war has entered a new phase.  This is the soft war that seeks to isolate Israel by delegitimizing it. The battleground is everywhere:  the media … multinational organizations … NGOs.

    In this war, the aim is to make Israel a pariah.

    The result is the curious situation we have today:  Israel becomes increasingly ostracized, while Iran – a nation that has made no secret of wishing Israel’s destruction – pursues nuclear weapons loudly, proudly, and without apparent fear of rebuke.

Israel “ostracized” by the media? Criticism of Israel as the latest manifestation of  terrorism? Iran pursuing nuclear weapons without fear of rebuke? Murdoch ought to have spent a bit more time reading his competitors. Israeli policies and perspectives receive largely deferential treatment by western international wire services that are still dominant in global news flows — and, of course, the US new media.

Murdoch also used the occasion to take a swipe at US President Barack Obama:

    I was pleased to hear the State Department’s spokesman clarify America’s position yesterday. He said that the United States recognizes “the special nature of the Israeli state. It is a state for the Jewish people.”

    This is an important message to send to the Middle East. When people see, for example, a Jewish prime minister treated badly by an American president, they see a more isolated Jewish state. That only encourages those who favor the gun over those who favor negotiation.

Obama’s alleged mistreatment of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was another myth purveyed by Murdoch-owned news media. Fox News fueled the hysteria about Obama “insulting” Netanyahu by conversing with him on the telephone on June 9, 2009 while his  legs were stretched out on his White House desk, revealing the soles of his shoes, at which an Arab might take umbrage. (Since neither Obama nor Netanyahu is Arab, it was unclear why this was considered to be of any relevance.) Accompanying the article was a photo released by the White House, showing Obama at ease while communicating with the Israeli Prime Minister.

All this has apparently earned Murdoch and his empire the unswerving loyalty of Israelis and the major institutions of the “Israel Lobby” here in the U.S. Last February, a group of 400 American rabbis objected to the Holocaust terminology used and misused by then-Fox News Channel commentator Glenn Beck. In an open letter published in the Wall Street Journal and the Forward, the rabbis appealed to Murdoch to sanction Beck and Fox News Chair Roger Ailes. The Jerusalem Post depicted  American Jews as critical of the rabbis, rather than of Beck, Ailes or Murdoch. JP quoted the  ADL’s  Foxman as saying that he found the rabbis’ public stance  against Beck and Ailes to be bizarre: “They’re not our enemy, and they are certainly not Holocaust deniers.”

A new accusation by former British Prime Minister Gordon Brown asserts the Murdoch media empire may have used known criminals to conduct  illicit surveillance activities such as hacking and wiretapping in order to obtain personal information. Heartlessly shoddy and amazingly under-handed (and illegal; not to say, immoral) journalistic practices at his news sites? Who cares, as long as he’s “good for Israel”? And if Murdoch is “good for Israel,” they’d all best shut up about him.

Crime not linked to recession. Bollocks.

Democracy is the great love of the failures and cowards of life. 

[R.J. Rushdoony, Thy Kingdom Come, 1978]

* * *

Brokenshire: 'There is no link between crime and the economy'

Minister for Crime and Security James Brokenshire says Britain's economic woes have not caused an increase in crime, despite a sharp rise in the number of UK burglaries, according to the British Crime Survey (BCS).

The survey of 45,000 households indicated that burglaries in England and Wales increased by 14 per cent in 2010-11 compared with the previous year.

The figures also showed a 6 per cent increase in violent crime with a sharp rises in domestic violence and assaults with minor injuries.

Minister for Crime and Security James Brokenshire denied there was a a rise "in recession-led crime" and argued the figures were not statistically significant.

Daily Telegraph, 14th July 2011

Only a politician can speak of a 14% rise in burglary, or a 6% rise in violent crime is "statistically insignificant".

The political class of Great Britain, like those of all Western nations,  have become completely dislocated from the real world. The exist in a bubble, of wealth, power and security.

Their incomes, their work, their life experiences are unlike 90% of the population.


Their children are never abused and sold as child prostitutes by Moslem child molesters.
Their wives are not gang raped by Somalian "asylum seekers" or refugees.
They are not murdered in their front garden by a gang of savages.
Their possessions are not stolen by junkie scum.  
They do not have to struggle with burglars inside their home. 
They do not watch their garden and home wrecked by vandals. 

Their income is guaranteed for their term of election, and most are reelected time after time - look at Tony Benn, Dennis Skinner, Ted Heath as examples: the vast majority sit for seats which rarely change allegiance, so thy are safe. Only a tiny minority of seats are swing seats, and an MP will move like lightening to a safe seat at the first opportunity. When they do retire they are kept in the lap of luxury with a gold plated, copper bottom, feather-bedded, taxpayer funded pension for life.

Crime isn't really bad. Unemployment is falling. We're doing something about immigration.  All these kinds of statements are the same sort of reassuring words you use to a child when thy ask difficult questions, but you can't ignore them.

They nod sagely and agree there are too many immigrants entering Britain, unemployment is terrible, housing is in short supply - whilst opening us to Syrian, Romanian,  Nigerian, Bulgarian, Liberian, Albanian, Egyptian, Ghanaian, Turkish, Botswanan, Iraqi, Iranian, Libyan, Afghani, Chinese, Kurdish, and South American immigration.

"We'll be tough on crime" they'll promise, whilst Ken Clarke MP, the whatever job title he is in the government  plans and plots to close prison places and flood the streets with criminals.

THEY NEVER SUFFER THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR ACTIONS. THEY ARE OF A SELECT CLASS, THE SERVANTS OF THE ELITE POWERS OF THE PLANET, THE ROTHSCHILD CLAN IN THE CITY OF LONDON, THE JESUITS IN THE VATICAN, AND THE JEWS IN WASHINGTON DC.

But their reassurances - they're not working any longer.

And as the political class becomes more distant from the people, only one of two things can be the conclusion: tyranny or revolution.  Presently the tyranny is building. Elections no longer matter, as the three parties in the UK which are in reality the governing class - Lib, Lab, Con - have philosophically merged, and now the discussion centres around the differing means to the predetermined end, rather than what the end is (death of ideological difference).

There is an implicit admission that things are unravelling. We already see that the multiculturalism and equalitarian dreams of the sixties have failed to come to fruition by voluntary choice, creating a colour blind, gender neutral socialist and co-operative commonwealth in Britain.

We have to have repressive laws because the people have failed to accept the wisdom offered by our ruling elite: including long prison sentences for those who will not comply by either by accepting the paradigm of a coffee coloured world or just keeping their mouths shut.

We are now fined for a thousand and one things which would, thirty years ago have been totally unacceptable by the mass of people. New regulations and laws are created by the ream each and every month, thousands of them, that we virtually "break the law" just by leaving the house. These of course, under real, Anglo Saxon Common Law, are nothing, unreal, and worthless. There is now power to just fine people without a trial (Magna Carta), but the government owns all the guns, all the police, all the courts and all the prisons, so are able to simply tax people to the nhilt (which is what these spurious fines really are - indirect  taxes).

Of course, while the police and other bodies are fining you for leaving your car parked more than 12" from the kerb, or leaving a trash bag by your wheelie bin on bin day, or some other non crime, REAL CRIMINALS, who REALLY break the REAL law, keep up their wickedness: drug dealers deal, rapists rape, murderers play X Box games in hotel style "prisons", Child Molesters are "understood" by health care professionals, and fraudsters are given community service hours. 

 * * * * 

St. Paul, in reminding the Corinthian Christians of their destiny, said, Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world? (I Cor. 6:2). Moffatt renders this, Do you not know that the saints are to manage the world?, a meaning we do not need to remind ourselves of. Church government is a prelude to world government, not by the church but by the saints. In trying to establish the necessary church government towards this end, Paul's constant appeal was, not to the form of church government or to the members, but to the law of God and the growth of the saints in terms of it (I Cor. 6:15-9:27). ....Judging, governing, or managing of the world is in terms of God's law. Because the saints were called to manage or govern the world, very quickly it became their purpose to move into positions of authority and power. 

[R.J. Rushdoony, The Institutes of Biblical Law (Nutley, NJ: Craig Press, 1973), pp. 773,742]

There's something bigger with Murdoch than a few hurt feelings.

NB I detest Murdoch, the Sun and Fox news, but my likes are not the point of this post.

Before we all die of laughter from the predicament that Rupert Murdoch has landed in, we need to consider the news behind the news. 
There is something more than meets the eye with this whole business. Murdoch has not only met with woes in his UK operation, but Fox News has been on the receiving end of a concerted campaign from, amongst other groups Media Matters, a gang of strident communists surrounding Obama and his Jewish handlers in Washington DC. 
Who stands to gain from this?
(1) The Trinity Mirror group, which owns the Indie and Daily/Sunday Mirror. The Sun (formerly the Labour supporting Daily Herald) has crushed all competition, and took the best selling tabloid spot from the Daily Mirror in the seventies, and unmoveable after that. 
(2) The BBC, whose only REAL (Richard Branson's "Virgin" cable network is inured in debt) competition IS Rupert and News International/News Corps. Because of the way in which Satellite TV was set up in the UK, there was virtually no competition to Sky. Only the BBC, with a licence fee, can compete on any sort of real equal level, but as with the old ITV, finds it hard to compete for viewers in light entertainment, sport and popular drama. 
(3) British Telecom, originally barred by Thatcher in the eighties from providing televisual services, has struggled to get "BT Vision" taken up by the viewers, because it relies on "Freeview" (crap) and Broadband Internet (crapper) .

From 2009: I'm told it's little better now: 

Ah, BT Vision. Avoid it like the plague is what i say. I had been a BT customer for phone and broadband for two years, it became overpriced so i called to cancel and they offered me BT Vision box, new Home Hub and first 3 months free to convince me to stay. Now the only thing i'd want BT Vision for is Setanta Sports (see my comment in the "Me V Setanta" thread) as i cant receive Setanta Sports where i am. I said to BT over the phone it's only any use to me if the signal for it comes down the Broadband Line, and not down the ariel. I was assured multiple times categorically that the signal comes down the Broadband line and would work fine.
[...]
I went with Sky after this for my Broadband and Phone, as ive had SkyTV for 5 years and never had a problem. And they've been great. They've done exactly what i asked them to do. Very simple isnt it?
But BT cant manage this.
http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?191870-BT-Vision-problem-fast-help-needed

(4) In the US, Murdoch has offered the only real alternative to CNN, ABC, CBS, MSNBC, the liberal print press and talk radio. His conservative/neo-con "Fox News" company wipes the floor for viewers with many of the liberal providers. The Communists are cock a hoop. 
(5) Obama, his Jewish handlers and the Democratic party in the US, whose bete noir has been Fox News. 
Within British politics, the fall of Murdoch, you will note has been greeted like children view Christmas. All three main parties have for thirty years lived in fear of Murdoch, and they smell blood, and suddenly have become incredibly brave. 

The Guardian is cock-a-hoop.The Indie is enraptured.The Mirror is at a near orgasm. 
So now, without Murdoch, we have the end of the false dichotomy, the fake paradigm, and the real start of the Liberal-Fascist-Communist state, where there will be an official line, we'll all just hear the same message, attuned only to class, economic status and race, but for all intents and purposes, identical. This is no victory for the White folk of this country. Whilst the Murdoch empire existed, strong and a real force, it restrained - to a large degree - the Reds. That's going, and I expect the deterioration of nation, economy and society generally to gather momentum . 
And there is no organised White, nationalist organisation to exploit this, so it's worthless to us. 


Hooray.