The British Establishment is as depraved and deluded as that of Nero and Caligula.

Malcolm McDowell as Caligula

This is an interesting reply to a comment, from the author of a blog post at Occidental dissent. The post is interesting too, and well worth a read.  

Hunter Wallace says:July 26, 2011 at 4:44 pm Nero wasn’t nearly as deluded as David Cameron.
Among the Ancients, there were individual emperors who were moral degenerates or who were crazy (Caligula and Nero being the most famous examples), but Roman society was too reality based to succumb to fantasy ideology.
Back then people could see that Nero was crazy and out of control. Now, thanks to fantasy ideology, which pervades entire societies thanks to television and movies, and the general detachment of “symbolic engineers” in office parks from the physical creation of wealth, lunatics can sound completely normal and mainstream.
Compare David Cameron to Nero. The former thinks that Muslims can successfully be integrated into British society. Nero plan’s was to weep before his enemies in order to impress them.
What about Caligula’s great victory over Poseidon? Isn’t that like LBJ’s War on Poverty?

Timing, old boy, timing: ruined careers, missing Prime Ministers, death of a journalist.

Since we are to have a Judicial Inquiry into the wicked Press, shouldn’t we also have one into wicked politicians? 

Journalists can be nasty, and newspapers beastly, but their misdeeds are as nothing set beside those of governments.

Governments also hack into phones, poke their noses into our personal affairs and misuse the information they obtain.

Peter Hitchens, the Daily Mail, 17th July 2011. Daily Mail, 17th July 2011.

There is a war going on internally, with the elites of the world. It is not our war, except in the sense that it is happening in public, so we perceive it. 
The Elite of the world are not a monolithic group either in membership or methodology: they are divided at times not on ends but means and strategy, and occasionally, like through a glass darkly, we are allowed a fleeting view. 
However whatever the punch line of this fracas, there will be no good in it for NO-ONE other than THEM. Both sides are commited to the same outcome, which will mean more death, mayhem rape and pillage for US ALL. 
For the UK, this is a battle between the "liberal" and "conservative" faction for control. The Labour Party, Guardian  and  BBC is ranged against the Tories and News International. 
That;'s certainly how it appars. 
But there is something deeper: 
WHERE ARE MURDOCH's friends in all of this. NO-ONE is speaking for News International or Murdoch. And yet Murdoch is a Papal Knight and one of the most openly commited ZIONISTS within Western media circles. Where are for example the US neocons, whom Murdoch did so much for over 20 years? Where are the Jesuits, ot the spokesmen of the Vatican? Where are his Jewish Zionist neocon buddies in the NY media set?

'Someone's coming to get me': Terrified phone-hacking whistleblower feared for his life before he was found dead

• http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2016132/Sean-Hoare-dead-News-World-phone-hacking-whistleblower-feared-life.html#ixzz1SZbuozrY

  
  

  Sean Hoare found dead at his flat in Watford, Herts

• Ex NotW reporter's claims last autumn reignited scandal

• Mr Hoare claimed Coulson's denials of phone hacking were 'a lie'

• Police probing former showbiz reporter's 'suicide'

• Friends suggest he may have died of natural causes

• Post mortem being carried out this morning

The pins are really beginning to fall. A dead Journalist, senior policemen have gone, and now the politicians are going directly into the spotlight. 

Times of India: 19th July 2011

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/uk/Hacking-row-may-singe-Cameron/articleshow/9278259.cms

LONDON: The News of the World crisis turned severe after UK's top police officer and one of his deputies resigned following allegations of taking favours from an ex-editor of the publication. Stephenson, London's metropolitan police commissioner at Scotland Yard, took responsibility for his force appointing Neil Wallis, a former deputy editor of News of the World, as a public relations adviser. 

Pointing a finger at Cameron, Stephenson suggested the PM risked being "compromised" by his proximity to former NOTW editor and Cameron's media director until January, Andy Coulson. "Once Neil Wallis's name did become associated (with hacking scandal), I did not want to compromise the PM in any way by revealing or discussing a potential suspect who clearly had a close relationship with Coulson," said Stephenson. Coulson is currently on bail. 

Where's Cameron? Skulking abroad in South Africa: 

The Metro: 19th July 2011

http://www.metro.co.uk/news/869711-david-cameron-survival-odds-plummet-after-calls-for-pm-to-quit

The odds on the prime minister leaving office plummeted after he came under fire for leaving for the trip on Sunday night and for his links to News International.

Mr Cameron is today due to return early from the planned four-day visit to Africa, and faces an emergency extra session in the House of Commons tomorrow.

Labour frontbencher Yvette Cooper said it looked like ‘one rule for the police and one for the prime minister’ – a reference to Sunday’s resignation of Met boss Sir Paul Stephenson over the scandal.

Sir Paul had aimed a barb at Mr Cameron’s ties to shamed former News of the World editor Andy Coulson, who was employed as the prime minister’s head of communications in Downing Street.

Labour backbenchers Dennis Skinner and Sir Gerald Kaufman called for the prime minister to quit. ‘When is dodgy Dave going to do the decent thing and resign?’ Mr Skinner asked.

Labour leader Ed Miliband refused to call for Mr Cameron’s head. It was, however, time for the prime minister to ‘apologise’ for employing Mr Coulson, he said. Deputy prime minister Nick Clegg said Mr Cameron should ‘absolutely not’ resign.

He added: ‘Let’s keep some perspective. The fear that people have is that a criminal investigation could be jeopardised by the contact between the police and media.’

Downing Street said the Africa trip was beneficial in drumming up British business opportunities. And Mr Cameron insisted he was taking ‘all appropriate action’, such as setting up a judicial inquiry into the hacking scandal.

‘I have been out there in parliament and in press conferences, fully answering the questions, fully transparent, very clear about what needs to be done,’ he added.

MPs will today quiz News Corporation chief Rupert Murdoch, his son, James – chairman of News International – and NI’s former chief executive Rebekah Brooks over phone-hacking and police corruption allegations.

Bookmaker Ladbrokes yesterday slashed the odds on Mr Cameron leaving office from 100/1 to 8/1.

 

The Liberal Democrats could become "partner" of the Conservatives - one civil union too far?

Well well well.... they're already working out the result of the next election. If you voted Lib Dem, or Labour,  you may not want to read the following:

The conservatives are considering an informal pact with the LibDems under which they would urge people to make Nick Clegg's party their second choice at the next general election.

The historic pact, which could severely dent Labour's prospects of returning to power, would be proposed in the event of a Yes vote in next May's referendum on whether to replace the current first-past-the-post system with the alternative vote (AV).

Under the latter, people rank candidates in order of preference. The one who comes last drops out and second preferences are redistributed until one candidate wins more than 50 per cent of the votes cast.

In return, David Cameron would ask Mr Clegg to urge voters to make the Conservatives their second choice. Some Tory MPs are advocating such an agreement to keep Labour out of power. Although Liberal Democrat MPs are more cautious, they admit a pact would be a possibility if the Coalition proves successful. An unofficial pact is seen as more realistic than a more formal share-out of seats under which the Tories and Liberal Democrats did not stand against each other in some seats, including the 57 held by Mr Clegg's party.

A formal deal on seats has been suggested by Nick Boles, a Tory MP and prominent supporter of Mr Cameron's drive to modernise his party. But the Tory and Liberal Democrat leaderships admit that would provoke strong opposition from local party activists and have reassured them the two Coalition parties will both fight every seat at the next election.

Although Mr Cameron will urge voters to stick with the current system, there has been a growing recognition in Tory circles since the formation of the Coalition that a switch to AV could help the party's prospects. Ironically, Labour was the only party to back an AV referendum at this year's general election. Its pledge helped Mr Clegg persuade the Tories to allow a plebiscite as part of the Coalition agreement. Tory MP David Mowat, who had a majority of 1,553 over Labour in his Warrington South constituency in May, said: "If we did have AV and we put Lib Dems second and they put us second, it would be very likely to give us a better result than we might achieve under first-past-the-post. There could be a squeeze effect on Labour."

The down side for the LibDems is that such a voting pact could close the door to a Coalition deal with Labour if it emerged as the largest party after an election. One senior Liberal Democrat said: "This would be a win-win for the Tories. They are never going to form a Coalition Labour, but we might."

Liberal Democrats are confident that the AV referendum can be won even though the No campaign has been faster out of the starting blocks. They will try to make it a vote on the benefits of "coalition politics" rather than the Government's record. They believe the public like the idea of parties working together, even if they are worried about the spending cuts announced last month by George Osborne, the Chancellor.

Independent, 3rd Nov. 2010

It is worth remembering that the Powers That Be view us common folk as dumb cattle, stupid bovine cud-chewers, who roll out every few years and do what The Sun and the Daily mirror instructs us so to do. 

I would be sickened if I'd voted LD in the last election. The LD's are political whores, willing to deal with whoever can hand out a few baubles in return for their support.

Of course, I'm happy enough to see a change in the voting system, as they're always rigging the system to their own advantage anyway - the Boundary Commission is a prime example. Nothing changes, for they have all the prison cells and guns, so we have the system we've got and work within it.

It may just give smaller parties a bite out of the parliamentary cherry, such as the Greens and the BNP.

It may even implode the three main parties, which would be no loss, and a positive bonus, because we can force ideological and tactical difference from these shattered bodies - missing for thirty years. 

Cameron loves the European Union, just like all good liberals.

Reposted with thanks, as I feel this man has found one of the very nubs of the problem of Britain and the EU : the Tories have swindled us into believing they are eurosceptic (which many members and a few MP's certainly are) whilst, in practicable political terms they - the leadership - are most certainly europhile.

DaveWatch: Cast-Iron Cameron's latest transparent ploy to kick Europe into the long grass

Gerald Warner (LINK to the blog post) 

How was it for you? Dave’s Churchillian moment – you know, his blood, sweat and tears offering this afternoon that promised Britain freedom from the domination of dark forces on the continent – did it reassure you? The latest pledges from Cast-Iron Cameron do not include a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty, of course, but what metropolitan sophisticate would take those sort of histrionics seriously?

No, we are entering exciting new territory in the great Conservative Euro-scam. There will be a referendum – wait for it! – on all future EU treaties. The chancers in Brussels, having got everything they wanted, have made it clear they will not be writing any more treaties for a long time, so this is just a tad academic.

An important point: a Cameron government will not try to claw back any serious powers within six months or a year of taking office. No, our salvation will be worked out “over a parliament”. That is a polite term for five years of procrastination, to kick the EU issue into the long grass. But Dave will be pressing for “repatriation” of powers over employment law, the charter of fundamental rights and criminal law.

Uh-huh? Correct me if I am wrong, but surely those “competences” are all deeply embedded in reams of small print within the Lisbon Treaty. So, to renegotiate them, Dave and William Hague would have to re-open the treaty. But we are told the treaty is so set in concrete it cannot be revised and that is why voters cannot have a referendum on it. If the British electorate cannot revisit it, how can Dave and William do so? Do they take us all for mugs (evident answer: yes)?

But soft! This is by no means the limit of Cast-Iron Dave’s munificence. Through the mechanism of a sovereignty Bill, he is going to give us a constitutional court to protect us from EU encroachment. Just 24 hours after we saw a grey-faced Vaclav Kraus tell the world that, thanks to the ruling of an EU-compliant constitutional court, the Czech Republic had ceased to exist as a sovereign nation, Dave is offering us a similar chocolate fireguard to defend our sovereignty. Gee, thanks, Dave. What can I say? (I mean, what can I say that would be printable?)

A constitutional court would be a charter for judicial activism such as we daily see sell out British rights and interests to asylum seekers, terrorists, EU bureaucrats, et al. As for renegotiating a few minor aspects of the Lisbon Treaty, why does Cameron imagine he will carry more clout if he goes into the negotiating chamber without the massive endorsement of the electorate in a referendum, which would set real alarm bells ringing in Brussels, rather than with such a mandate?

All this Tory Euroguff is no more than a device to persuade gullible voters to stay with Dave and his forsworn party. Whether you fall for it or not is a simple intelligence test. Presumably, too, these scrappy, mini-commitments are as “cast-iron” as his previous unconditional pledge of a referendum. Tory rhetoric has now shifted, desperately, to a platform of preserving the remaining sovereign powers that Britain possesses post-Lisbon. What powers would those be, Dave?

The EU is popular with all liberals (left and right) because it BYPASSES Parliament, Constitution, and Law. The comrades in the Labour Party under Kinnock got this in the mid eighties - all their wet dreams could be foisted onto Britain not by long drawn out debates in Westminster, by arguing at the elections, but by diktat from an unelected Commissioner-Dictator from the EU Commission. And the lunatic libertarian "free market" & "no borders" Libertarians realised it earlier - imagine MILLIONS of Poles, Romanians, Bulgarians, Slovaks, falling over themselves to live on a pittance, in overcrowded slums, filling the chicken slaughtering factories, laying the foundations of glass and concrete Cathedrals of Capitalism.....

The Tories will not save us from tyranny because they are part of it.

David Cameron - illuminati Connection? Multi Culti psychopath? Communist?

No change then.

Watch the videos.

The UK Trade Unions are about to shoot themselves in the foot.

The TUC has woken up, with all the noise of the present dire economic straits of it's Public Sector working membership. 


At some point in the next year or two, sooner rather than later, there are going to have to be severe and deep cuts to public spending, and as salaries are the major part of the budget to be cut. 


I can assure you that the international bankers are of far more importance to the Westminster parliament than the public services. 


Further: the Vatican controlled, and Jesuit trained EU leadership wants Britain brought to ruin to suck out nation fully and completely into their Beast government. 


So the cuts are going to come, no matter how many toy-town Trotskyists lead the charge against them Both The Morning Star (Communist) and Socialist Worker (Trotskyist) are foaming at the mouth to get at the Tories, like the Tories matter in the great game. And after all, Russia, China and Cuba are all such shining beacons for the international proletariat, aren't they?


Public Sector workers are some of the best paid people in Britain - their feather bedded lifestyle, their gold plated pensions - and are likely to gain much sympathy from the millions working part time/temp/casual for the minimum wage. The Sun will have a field day. 


All that will happen in the economy is the worth of Gilts (government bonds) will fall and become harder to sell, forcing the rate nof return - the percentage return on the investment - to rise, meaning more public service cuts to pay the interest. It will cost the government more to borrow money, all that's keeping Britain afloat at the moment. 


The cuts will happen. The Rothschilds and their acolytes will get their gold. 

The Guardian 14th September 2010

This is trade unionism's moment. Voters are increasingly worried about the cuts, and are ready to hear an alternative to the eye-watering spending decisions expected in next month's comprehensive spending review.

Our challenge is to turn this into a great campaign, uniting a coalition of communities, service users and political and campaign groups to stop the most savage cuts in our welfare and social infrastructure for generations.

Unions will have to reach well beyond our membership – which, at more than 6 million, makes us still the country's biggest voluntary organisation by far – to secure a mass impact. But no one else can play this central role, extending beyond party politics and sectional interests to speak up for beleaguered Britain as a whole.

Top Cop warns of riots in Britain as the economy goes down the drain.

The political system is operated as a false paradigm: the three major parties are merely facets of the global Elite. Communism, Fascism, Libertarianism, Socialism, all the same, all deadly. They exist to rule us at the diktat of the world of the International Finance power-brokers. 

Daily Mail, 14th September 2010

Public sector cutbacks could lead to riots, one of the country's top police officers will warn this week.

Derek Barnett, president of the Police Superintendents Association, believes the country is facing a 'period where disaffection, social and industrial tensions will rise'.

His gloomy views are outlined in a draft copy of a speech he will give to his organisation's annual conference in Chester tomorrow.

His comments come just days after the Police Federation claimed the loss of up to 40,000 frontline police jobs because of Government cuts would be 'Christmas for criminals'.

Today, former Lib Dem leader Charles Kennedy became the first high profile Government backbencher to attack the cuts. Mr Kennedy said it was important not to 'throw the baby out with the bath water' when deciding where and how deep to wield the axe.haqvehaqve

Mr Barnett, in his first major address since taking over as head of the Police Superintendents Association earlier this year, will say tomorrow: 'We know that funding will be reduced, but the Government has to recognise that no matter how important dealing with the current financial problems may be, there will be an inevitable dilution of front line services if police budgets are cut too severely.

But here's the really interesting bit from the story:

'As we jail fewer criminals, there will be more criminals at large.

'As police funding is reduced there will simply be fewer police officers on the streets. Many forces are not recruiting, indicative of the financial climate which now prevails.

In his speech, due to be delivered in front of the Home Secretary Theresa May, he adds that the public have 'a right to know' the extent of the likely cuts in policing.

 Really? Might have been nice if this had been taken into consideration by the government BEFORE they released THOUSANDS of criminals under "Early Release" schemes. Thousands of rapists, murderers, and generally vicious thugs are wandering the streets, who are going to lose their welfare payments in the near future....


This is EXACTLY WHAT THE COMMUNISTS IN PARLIAMENT AND OUTSIDE OF IT WANT - Britain to become so disrupted they can slip into an open dictatorship. 


This is why the Euro Police have been set up, and why European soldiers are allowed to serve in Britain in a "security role". They have known this is coming for many years, just not when, because all communistic societies fall to bits under the weight of their own contradictions. 


And now, the Prison Officers are threatening strikes: 

Daily Telegraph 14th Sept 2010

Steve Gillan, leader of the Prison Officers’ Association, said his members were prepared to strike – even though they are not allowed to by law.

He told a fringe meeting at the Trades Union Congress: “If they are going to kick us to death we will take action irrespective of the legislation.

These are troubled times for the Coalition, but worse is to come - Telegraph

From the Telegraph ( UK)

David Cameron intended this week to be a demonstration of politics as it should be, ministers and MPs carrying out the people's business by debating serious issues. The Commons was made to return for a September sitting, to show its usefulness and prepare the ground for the difficult times ahead. The Coalition would display unity of purpose by promoting its constitutional reforms, before heading for the all-important round of party conferences.

Instead, the Prime Minister is momentarily out of action, called away by the sudden death of his father, Ian, in France yesterday. His absence extends the paternity leave that was due to finish this week, and forced him to miss the first Prime Minister's Questions of the new session. Just when he should be re-emerging from an extended summer break to lead his Government, he is weighed down by bereavement for the "huge hero figure" he adored.

Family must come first, as it always has done for the Prime Minister. But his presence is urgently needed by his party, to draw a line under a period of damaging media coverage that has left two of his most valued advisers compromised. There was compassion on display in the Commons yesterday, but this remains a difficult time for the Coalition.

William Hague's judgment has been called into question by the appointment and subsequent resignation of his special adviser, Christopher Myers. The Foreign Secretary's statement denying the lurid rumours surrounding their relationship, and revealing the fertility difficulties he and his wife Ffion have suffered, earned him a mixture of sympathy and head-shaking from Conservative MPs. Most are baffled by his behaviour, while many fear that a Cabinet big beast has reduced himself to lame duck status at a time when his instinctive connection with the Tory party, and in particular voters in the North, makes him a vital member of the Coalition. No one questions the truthfulness of his account, but the Westminster market place is an unforgiving one, and his price has been markedly discounted. Mr Hague must use the party conference in Birmingham to remind us that he still has fight in his heart.

For Andy Coulson the damage is less obvious, but no less threatening. He does not appear to be in any legal danger from the renewed interest in theNews of the World bugging affair. The Metropolitan Police shows no desire to be dragged into another politicised investigation, and no one has yet produced evidence against him that looks strong enough to satisfy a court. But Labour are running an effective mud-slinging operation which has so far produced a police pledge to interview Mr Coulson about the latest claims, a new inquiry by the Home Affairs Select Committee, and an offer from the Speaker of a Commons debate today on the allegations that under Mr Coulson's editorship the News of the World intercepted the telephone messages of politicians and celebrities. Not bad going for a party that is supposed to be recovering from a brutal defeat.

As a result, the issue is in the headlines, and so far no amount of No 10 news engineering – including ordering the release of details of HM Revenue & Customs' mishandling of tax records – has provided sufficient distraction. Nick Clegg, standing in for the Prime Minister in the Commons yesterday, delivered a useful reminder of Labour's own inglorious relationship with the Murdoch empire by pointing out that the first person to call and offer sympathy when Mr Coulson resigned as editor at the height of the scandal was Gordon Brown. The then chancellor assured Mr Coulson that he had done the honourable thing and "would go on to do a worthwhile job". Mr Cameron can ill afford to have the man in charge of organising the Government's message appearing on the ten o'clock news night after night, with cameramen on his doorstep. At some point, resisting such attention is no longer worthwhile.

Yet all this turbulence is nothing compared with what will hit the Coalition next month when George Osborne unveils his Comprehensive Spending Review (CSR) – at that point, all hell will break loose. "We are in a canoe paddling down the Zambezi, and Victoria Falls lie dead ahead. Once we've gone over the edge, none of this will matter," one leading Cameroon told me. The edge, for those at Westminster who worry about it, is the moment we discover just how bad the cuts are going to be. To judge by what Cabinet ministers and officials are saying, many worry that the Coalition has not done nearly enough to warn the public of the abyss into which the country is about to plunge. "If we have had a collective failure," one Cabinet minister says, "it is that we have underplayed the scale of the problem."

The review itself is proceeding to the Chancellor's satisfaction. He describes it as "a funnel" – a decision-making process that gradually filters a giant mass of information and numbers down to some conclusions. Some major departments are about to settle their budgets, and there is so far no sign of incipient panic or a last-minute, Gordon Brown-style scramble.

What is little understood about the spending review is that it will decide significant political issues which by themselves would normally deserve weeks or months of scrutiny and debate. Consider that in addition to the task of deciding final numbers, department by department, for a parliament's worth of spending, the CSR must also make policy decisions about how to fund higher education, how to reform benefits, how to shape the future of Britain's defence. Alone, these are each explosive issues that could bring down a government. To seek to resolve them in one great political moment is ambition on an impressive scale.

From inside the machine, the tone is optimistic: health is settled, education is safe, the two sticking points of defence and welfare reform are close to being resolved. Outsiders are not so sure: they say the NHS is being pushed into an unnecessary turmoil of reform, that education changes have been too timid so far, that welfare cannot be usefully reformed without attacking universal benefits, and that defence cuts are about to relegate us to onlooker status on the world stage.

The other consideration is the level of detail that can be expected from the CSR. Those wanting every cut to be spelled out down to the last by-pass and job centre will be disappointed. While each department will have its budget settled, and its priorities set, there will be months of further difficult decisions to come. Ministers mutter darkly about what 40 per cent cuts will mean. They worry that the voters and even MPs have yet to grasp what the public sector landscape will look like.

How Coalition MPs will cope when they are caught between cuts and constituents is unknown. Whips fear that the new Tory intake in particular is marked by an independent streak. They learned on the campaign trail the trick of their new Lib Dem partners to be local champions dedicated to protecting local services. The Treasury is more optimistic that backbench independence will not translate into nimbyism. "People realise that we were elected on a platform to tackle the deficit and it would look odd if we shied away now," one source says.

So things look unexpectedly tough for the Conservative leadership this week. The political narrative is running against them. But they shouldn't fret too much. It is going to get far, far worse.

These are troubled times for the Coalition, but worse is to come - Telegraph

Common Purpose - Freemasonry for County Halls and Town Halls in Britain.

From the website: Stop Common Purpose.

The Hidden Agenda 

Update: 2010-05-15 The recent change of government is just an illusion. The same people are still pulling the strings. The hidden agenda continues. 

From 1997, the New Labour government worked to two agendas. Firstly, the open agenda as laid out in their manifestos and secondly, their hidden agenda. 

The objective of the hidden agenda is the creation of a Communitarian society controlled by the EU collective. 

In order to achieve this objective, the New Labour government ran a parallel administration made up of QUANGOs and fake charities. A fake charity is legally a charity but effectively operates as a government department, receiving a substantial amount of funding directly or indirectly from government and operating as a government department. 

The hidden agenda continues to operate under the coalition government.

The British parliament has become just a puppet organization. They merely go through the motions - the pretense of acting like a governing body, but the reality is they are just rubber stamping the programmes of the New World Order global communitarian technocrats. 

Common Purpose is a fraudulent 'educational charity' acting as a change agent and recruiter and is part of the management mechanism being used to carry out this hidden agenda. 

Whilst carrying out the hidden agenda, Common Purpose has corruptly abused millions of pounds of taxpayers' money. 

Common Purpose is guilty of defrauding YOU of YOUR money. 

Some people think that Common Purpose is simply a criminal organisation set up to siphon off public money but there is a lot more than that to the Common Purpose agenda. 

What is Common Purpose? 

On the surface, Common Purpose is an educational charity, registered in the UK under number 1023384, that does leadership and networking development training. 

However, Common Purpose is not what it appears to be on the surface.

In reality, Common Purpose is a corrupt, subversive, secretive and deeply sinister organisation with a hidden agenda (Communitarian social control, corporate and EU state control) and hidden backers (Tavistock Institute, Fabian Society, Brussels). 

Common Purpose is a change agent being used to recruit and train the commissars and apparatchiks needed to implement the hidden New World Order global communitarian technocratic agenda. 

William Hauge: E.U. Enlargement.

And you dozy imbeciles vote Tory because they are the CONSERVatives? What, precisely, did this party of traitors and criminals ever preserve, precisely?

Lord Brittan returns as trade adviser - Telegraph

This filthy little spiv is back again, I see. Many may have done, but I haven't forgotten how you grimaced and leered over the destruction of the British economy in the nineteen eighties, you piece of scum. 

You condemned millions to unemployment, destroyed the family unit, and handed national assets to your international globalist friends  in the City of London and further afield, worth billions of pounds, for a fraction of their value. 

I can only assume you've come for the final violent rape and beating before you cut our collective throats. I can't see any other use or purpose for you.

The Tory grandee has been appointed as a trade adviser to the Coalition Government, working closely with Vince Cable, the Business Secretary.

Lord Brittan, 70, who resigned from Mrs Thatcher's Cabinet in the wake of the Westland Affair in 1987, will feed into a White Paper on trade strategy due next year.

His post will last just six months, starting from September, during which time he will take a leave of absence from UBS, the investment bank of which he is vice-chairman.
Mr Cable said: "Lord Brittan will help develop the agenda to promote the UK as a great trading nation, wanting to see free trade and open markets around the world. He will provide valuable insight as we develop an overarching trade and investment strategy across Government."
Lord Brittan, who also served as Home Secretary under Mrs Thatcher, spent most of the 1990s serving on the European Commission, where Nick Clegg was one of his aides.
Although highly respected, Lord Brittan's appointment will be seen as a failure on the part of the Government to find a full-time Trade Minister.
The former incumbent, Lord Davies, the former boss of Standard Chartered, is thought to have declined an offer to stay on. Others reported to have been asked include Sir Stuart Rose. Mark Prisk is acting Trade Minister.

Lord Brittan returns as trade adviser - Telegraph

NB: In the United Kingdom, a spiv is a particular type of petty criminal, who deals in stolen or black market goods of questionable authenticity, especially a slickly-dressed man offering goods at bargain prices. The goods are generally not what they seem or have been obtained illegally.
  
NB: From Wikipedia:   Leon Brittan was born to parents of Lithuanian Jewish extraction, and was educated at the Haberdashers' Aske's Boys' School and then Trinity College, Cambridge (where he was President of the Cambridge Union Society and Chairman of Cambridge University Conservative Association) as well as being a contemporary of Nobel Prize winning economist Amartya Sen. He started his career as a lawyer.

NHS facing £65bn 'mortgage' bill for PFI - Telegraph

Figures obtained by the BBC show that some NHS trusts are spending more than 10 percent of their turnover on the annual ''mortgage'' repayments.

Under PFI, private companies win contracts to build and maintain new hospitals and mental health units and the NHS pays off the ''mortgage'' over around 30 years.

The 103 schemes were valued at a total of £11.3bn when they were built.

But when rising fees and additional costs such as maintenance, cleaning and catering are taken into account, the NHS will have to pay back £65.1bn over the lifetime of the schemes. Some contracts are reportedly so restrictive that trusts are forced to pay hundreds of pounds just to get half a dozen pictures put up.

According to the data, the NHS currently pays back a total of £1.25bn each year but this figure is expected to increase until 2030 when it will hit £2.3bn, the BBC reported.

The final payment will not be made until 2048.

Professor John Appleby, chief economist at the King's Fund health think-tank, said: ''It is a bit like taking out a pretty big mortgage in the expectation your income is going to rise, but the NHS is facing a period where that is not going to happen.''

Dr Mark Porter, of the British Medical Association, added: ''Locking the NHS into long-term contracts with the private sector has made entire local health economies more vulnerable to changing conditions.

''Now the financial crisis has changed conditions beyond recognition, so trusts tied into PFI deals have even less freedom to make business decisions that protect services, making cuts and closures more likely.''

Nigel Edwards, director of policy at the NHS Confederation, which represents trusts, told the BBC: ''They were planned for a different world. I'm sure that in some cases people feel their hands are tied.''

NHS facing £65bn 'mortgage' bill for PFI - Telegraph

They are all to blame for this, they all supported it, so Liberal Labour and Tory should be strung up in equal number and manner.


We will be bled white for decades for this.

Tory stooge floats the idea of releasing child rapists and murderers for community service.

The Tories have come up with a jolly wheeze.

They intend to open up the prisons and allow the wicked, deranged and murderous onto the streets. All in the interests of saving money.

Probation watchdog: serious crimes may be price to pay for cutting cost of justice

Murders and other serious crimes committed by prisoners released early from jail may have to be “accepted” by the public as part of attempts to keep down the cost of the criminal justice system, the probation watchdog suggested.

Daily Telegraph (UK) 12th July 2010

Andrew Bridges questioned whether it was worth keeping thousands of violent and dangerous offenders locked up for longer than the minimum jail term set by a court just to stop a few of them committing new crimes.

Some reoffending — even if it involved “serious” new crimes — could be the price that society had to pay for trying to cut down on the huge cost of the country’s rising prison population, said Mr Bridges, the chief inspector of probation. While acknowledging that prison reduced crime, he described it as a “rather drastic form of crime prevention” and said it was time to consider dealing with more offenders in the community.

There then. When your wife is raped, your child murdered, your father beaten senseless for his old age pension, that's the "price worth paying" Makes you feel warm inside, don't  it?