Savages riot in London, Manchester, Liverpool and Birmingham.

How Britain was, and should be again. A see of British faces, 1900. 

The outcome of mass immigration, the desperate liberal attempt at creating a multicultural society has fallen flat on it's arse once again. 

Enoch Powell told us, in plain English, what would come to pass. He was only wrong in his timing. Hordes of Immigrants, and the children of immigrants, with white youth blindly following,  following their coat-tails, are right now destroying the towns and cities of England. And that was the very purpose of their invitation in the first place: the destruction of all that was, and is, Britain. 

We have little or no Law with which to combat this: the Police have been ruined with "sensitivity training" and  "multicultural training" , and the punishments which will be imposed are a joke, with accommodation of the quality of a three star hotel. 

This has to be the last time. 
The corrupt dog and pony show which passes for government has to be swept away from their positions of power. They have consistently lied about the number of immigrants, the worthwhileness of immigration, and the outcome of immigration: they would have you believe that everything to do with immigration has just been peachy, a great success, and, basically, anyone who disagrees is just a nasty old hater. These scum have sold my, and my children's, birthright. They have handed my nation to a vicious barbaric and savage horde. 
But then the government is operated and owned by scum that can simply - up sticks and piss off abroad, if the shit hits the fan, can't they? They also ALWAYS get protection from the Law and the Police, and if necessary  - the Army. 
Law must be once again returned to the streets. The government is UNFIT, so we must take power and restore it. 
The flogging post, the gallows, the treadmill - all must return. The corrupt political appointments who pass for magistrates and judges must be hauled away and we must dispense Justice. 
Most importantly - each and every immigrant must be removed back to their place of origin. 

Crime not linked to recession. Bollocks.

Democracy is the great love of the failures and cowards of life. 

[R.J. Rushdoony, Thy Kingdom Come, 1978]

* * *

Brokenshire: 'There is no link between crime and the economy'

Minister for Crime and Security James Brokenshire says Britain's economic woes have not caused an increase in crime, despite a sharp rise in the number of UK burglaries, according to the British Crime Survey (BCS).

The survey of 45,000 households indicated that burglaries in England and Wales increased by 14 per cent in 2010-11 compared with the previous year.

The figures also showed a 6 per cent increase in violent crime with a sharp rises in domestic violence and assaults with minor injuries.

Minister for Crime and Security James Brokenshire denied there was a a rise "in recession-led crime" and argued the figures were not statistically significant.

Daily Telegraph, 14th July 2011

Only a politician can speak of a 14% rise in burglary, or a 6% rise in violent crime is "statistically insignificant".

The political class of Great Britain, like those of all Western nations,  have become completely dislocated from the real world. The exist in a bubble, of wealth, power and security.

Their incomes, their work, their life experiences are unlike 90% of the population.


Their children are never abused and sold as child prostitutes by Moslem child molesters.
Their wives are not gang raped by Somalian "asylum seekers" or refugees.
They are not murdered in their front garden by a gang of savages.
Their possessions are not stolen by junkie scum.  
They do not have to struggle with burglars inside their home. 
They do not watch their garden and home wrecked by vandals. 

Their income is guaranteed for their term of election, and most are reelected time after time - look at Tony Benn, Dennis Skinner, Ted Heath as examples: the vast majority sit for seats which rarely change allegiance, so thy are safe. Only a tiny minority of seats are swing seats, and an MP will move like lightening to a safe seat at the first opportunity. When they do retire they are kept in the lap of luxury with a gold plated, copper bottom, feather-bedded, taxpayer funded pension for life.

Crime isn't really bad. Unemployment is falling. We're doing something about immigration.  All these kinds of statements are the same sort of reassuring words you use to a child when thy ask difficult questions, but you can't ignore them.

They nod sagely and agree there are too many immigrants entering Britain, unemployment is terrible, housing is in short supply - whilst opening us to Syrian, Romanian,  Nigerian, Bulgarian, Liberian, Albanian, Egyptian, Ghanaian, Turkish, Botswanan, Iraqi, Iranian, Libyan, Afghani, Chinese, Kurdish, and South American immigration.

"We'll be tough on crime" they'll promise, whilst Ken Clarke MP, the whatever job title he is in the government  plans and plots to close prison places and flood the streets with criminals.

THEY NEVER SUFFER THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR ACTIONS. THEY ARE OF A SELECT CLASS, THE SERVANTS OF THE ELITE POWERS OF THE PLANET, THE ROTHSCHILD CLAN IN THE CITY OF LONDON, THE JESUITS IN THE VATICAN, AND THE JEWS IN WASHINGTON DC.

But their reassurances - they're not working any longer.

And as the political class becomes more distant from the people, only one of two things can be the conclusion: tyranny or revolution.  Presently the tyranny is building. Elections no longer matter, as the three parties in the UK which are in reality the governing class - Lib, Lab, Con - have philosophically merged, and now the discussion centres around the differing means to the predetermined end, rather than what the end is (death of ideological difference).

There is an implicit admission that things are unravelling. We already see that the multiculturalism and equalitarian dreams of the sixties have failed to come to fruition by voluntary choice, creating a colour blind, gender neutral socialist and co-operative commonwealth in Britain.

We have to have repressive laws because the people have failed to accept the wisdom offered by our ruling elite: including long prison sentences for those who will not comply by either by accepting the paradigm of a coffee coloured world or just keeping their mouths shut.

We are now fined for a thousand and one things which would, thirty years ago have been totally unacceptable by the mass of people. New regulations and laws are created by the ream each and every month, thousands of them, that we virtually "break the law" just by leaving the house. These of course, under real, Anglo Saxon Common Law, are nothing, unreal, and worthless. There is now power to just fine people without a trial (Magna Carta), but the government owns all the guns, all the police, all the courts and all the prisons, so are able to simply tax people to the nhilt (which is what these spurious fines really are - indirect  taxes).

Of course, while the police and other bodies are fining you for leaving your car parked more than 12" from the kerb, or leaving a trash bag by your wheelie bin on bin day, or some other non crime, REAL CRIMINALS, who REALLY break the REAL law, keep up their wickedness: drug dealers deal, rapists rape, murderers play X Box games in hotel style "prisons", Child Molesters are "understood" by health care professionals, and fraudsters are given community service hours. 

 * * * * 

St. Paul, in reminding the Corinthian Christians of their destiny, said, Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world? (I Cor. 6:2). Moffatt renders this, Do you not know that the saints are to manage the world?, a meaning we do not need to remind ourselves of. Church government is a prelude to world government, not by the church but by the saints. In trying to establish the necessary church government towards this end, Paul's constant appeal was, not to the form of church government or to the members, but to the law of God and the growth of the saints in terms of it (I Cor. 6:15-9:27). ....Judging, governing, or managing of the world is in terms of God's law. Because the saints were called to manage or govern the world, very quickly it became their purpose to move into positions of authority and power. 

[R.J. Rushdoony, The Institutes of Biblical Law (Nutley, NJ: Craig Press, 1973), pp. 773,742]

Scandal: Foreign Aid Budget is Twice as Much as British Higher Education Budget

Scandal: Foreign Aid Budget is Twice as Much as British Higher Education Budget

Evidence of the vicious anti-British nature of the Westminster parties has come with the “education budget cut” announced by the ConDem regime — which inadvertently revealed that the foreign aid budget is now twice as high as the higher education budget.

The shocking news was contained in the announcement by Chancellor George Osborne that the spending review cuts have meant that the higher education budget will be cut from £7.1 billion to £4.2 billion by 2014.

As bad as that news is, a quick look at the “ring fenced” foreign aid budget reveals that even prior to the recession, more money was being put aside for foreign aid than for higher education.

A “revised spending budget” issued by the Department for International Development (DFID) in June 2009 showed that the foreign aid budget for 2009/10 was £6.8 billion and was set to rise to £7.7 billion in the 2010/11 financial year.

The DFID announcement has deliberately understated the figures, hiding the true cost with an administrative trick. The figures they announced are only the direct aid programme, and not the total cost, which is called the “Gross Public Expenditure on Development” (GPEX) – which adds nearly £2 billion each year to total DFID expenditure.

For example, the GPEX in 2007/08 amounted to £6.027 billion, of which £5.2 billion was direct aid. The GPEX for 2006/07 was £7.4 billion, of which £4.9 billion was direct aid, and the GPEX for 2005/06 was £6.6 billion, of which £4.4 billion was direct aid.

NPI, 23rd Oct. 2010

Foreign Aid is the organized theft of the financial strength of white, British people and it's transference to third world regimes for social, political and sexual engineering games under the auspices of the United Nations.

And they're getting away with it. 

It is Communism, and most people are so saturated by food additives, fluoride in the toothpaste, TV and printed media and sport, the scum that operate tis fraud don't even bother to justify or hide it. They thing you are SHEEPLE, that you are stupid and easily frightened.

Appears that, generally, they're right.





  

Thatcher was a tool of International Finance interbred, nepotistic Zio-Communits.

I hated Margaret Thatcher from the moment I first heard her voice in the mid nineteen seventies.

She was nothing more or less than the local agent of the City of London, whose purpose was to take British manufacturing, transport, Utility and Energy extraction and prouction and shovel it into the hands of International Finance.



The culmination of the Great Asset Strip, although begun in the nineteen fifties, of industries worth hundreds of billions of pounds, and vital to the broad economic structure, occurred under Thatcher, and was the point of the misery of the nineteen eighties, and the cause of the misery now.

Nothing - even direct theft got in Thatcher's way:

It was during Mrs. Thatcher’s second term that significant privatisations occurred. The time was right, public assets were large corporations that had become unpopular among the electorate. Many large privatisations, such as British Telecom(BT), British Gas(BG) and the Trustee Savings Bank(TSB), were sold through an Initial Public Offering (IPO). These stock foliations were staggered and provided large capital income for the treasury. This was key in achieving balanced budgets over many years, as the economy restructured. These stocks were undervalued at their IPO’s, which gave share holders immediate capital gains. 

Link.

 But was the TSB free to be sold? No, it was STOLEN from the members.

 The TSB was dedicated to serving the community and effectively competed with the big clearing banks by successfully attracting deposits.

TSB served its customers well but retained some of its profits instead of passing them on to its customers by more competitive interest rates. So its reserves accumulated, had become very substantial, were in effect serving the community.

Ownership of the bank and its reserves became important when a Conservative government decided to 'privatise' the bank and convert it into a shareholder-owned profit-maximising bank just like the commercial banks.

A 1973 report had stated that if the banks are to be considered as mutual organisations without shareholders the depositors are entitled to the full value of the bank. (TSB 03}

The TSBs were freed from competitive restrictions in 1976 {TSB 05}. The 1981 TSB Act in turn states that the TSB can accept deposits, accumulate the produce and return the deposits and produce to the depositors after deducting any necessary expenses of management, but without deriving any benefit from the deposits or produce. {TSB 01}

The TSBs serve the community. Trustees are meant to ensure the TSBs are run for the benefit of their depositors and of the community, their assets being looked after by Trustees on behalf of the depositors.

But then the UK government decided to 'privatise' the TSBs, to sell them off, stating in the 1984 White Paper:

The TSBs do not belong to the Government. Nor do they belong to the trustees, to their employees or to their depositors. {TSB 05}

So the government is proceeding to sell the TSBs although it considers that they do not belong to the government, on the basis that the TSBs and their assets belong to nobody, that no one owns the bank.

The TSB's assets were to be transferred to a public limited company before flotation {TSB 01}. This is how Andrew Murray commented in the Financial Times:

As it considers that the TSB belongs to no one, the government apparently intends to appropriate the assets by Act of Parliament, fix the price, make the sale and return the payment with the goods. In other words, the existing assets would be a free gift to the purchasers of the shares. {TSB 06}

The 1985 Act then took away the powers of the depositors. The bank is to be run first and foremost for its shareholders. {TSB 01}

Link 

And these bastards have the audacity to persecute organised crime. 

So, Thatcher for Dummies:

(i) Sell the assets of the country to the lowest bidder. (ii) Use the crude oil receipts from North Sea oil  to both pay for unemployment and buy of the middle class with comfortable public sector jobs (with the promise of early retirement, gilt edged pensions etc, which won't be honoured when the economy hits the skids). (iii) Rape out anything that can be liquidated, then run like hell to China, India or Israel. 

Today there will be no real recovery: we in Britain are now a banana republic. There is nothing left for the great mass of people to do that will RAISE THEIR STANDARD OF LIVING, or even maintain it, nothing to improve their lot.  They are stuck on the minium wage, low tech, casual/part time service sector work.

You sell me a burger, I'll sell you shoes, she'll sell you a cinema ticket, you sell me a burger, I'll sell you shoes, etc. All imported third rate garbage imported from China, with the profits heading back there. The only people making any money - and real assets, which they invest in immediately to get rid of the paper - are those who serve the City of London - Bankers, Insurance merchants and the like.

All the real structure of the economy - rail, electricity, natural gas, petroleum,  water & sewerage, docks and waterways - are in the hands of International Finance Capital globalist political psychopaths. They serve their purpose, which is absolute profit over all other concerns.

 There is no real economy to recover. There is only TESCO, Virgin Cinema,  Shoe Zone and Greggs the Baker. And the Pound shops, selling substandard trash. Large swathes of the town centre here where I live are empty. There are no really productive jobs, making things to sell to others at home and abroad.

And now, having gained absolute control of the infrastructure they are busy raping the personal asset base of the middle class. Pensions, Houses, Stocks and Shares, all to be liquidated in a massive wealth transfer. 

Then the destruction of the free and Christian West will be complete.

A subservient people, whose lives consist of service sector labour, drugs, porn and ultraviolence.

The Powers That Be have, using the fake Left/Centre/Right political paradigm,  created a system of communism below our feet, there for you to see it if you want to, a communism of the mega wealthy, interconnected, intermarried global Elite.  A small number of incestuous, nepotistic families rule the planet [click here for link]. They include US Presidents, British Royalty,  the Jewish Banking family of the Rothschilds, Bill Gates, Al Gore, Bill and Hillary Clinton, and Tony Blair.

Their three global bases are The City of London (Finance), Rome (Vatican - spirituality) and Washington DC (Military).

And Thatcher was up to her elbows in it. She has her fingerprints all over it. She was never placed into power to do anything but ease control from Parliament to the International Finance Mafia. She was traitorous in her actions.

The Thatcher - Reagan axis was just another stage in the creation of the New World Order.

We have a gang of people, who have expropriated the assets of the people, set up their class into an self serving oligarchy, and direct every aspect of your life through finance, tyrannical laws and endlessly changing bureaucratic regulations. 

Sweet.

Sounds like Communism to me.  here's the piece that caused this spleen venting: 

On Friday evening, a tall, bespectacled 30-ish Englishman, Matthew Elliott, escorted Lady Margaret Thatcher into a reception at London's 800-year-old Guild Hall. Despite the fact that England is going through its worst economic crisis since Mrs. Thatcher became prime minister more than three decades ago, she was of good cheer as she conversed with those of us who had come to pay our respects. Perhaps a reason for her upbeat manner was that the ideas she (and Ronald Reagan in the United States) championed are once again gaining currency.

(...) 

The good news is that those who believe in limited government and free markets are energized in both the United States and Europe. The bad news is that even the reform governments, such as the new British government, so far have not been sufficiently bold to do what needs to be done

Brussels  Journal, 14/09/2010

Her secondary purpose was to finish the Cold War, as what could be sucked from the USSR had been, in terms of profits, and now was the time for a change in paradigms. See the history of Russia post Cold War under drunken bum and toe-rag of the Square Mile, Boris Yeltsin.

Arm the British folk now - stop the savages raping, attacking and murdering the British people!

During 2009, violent crime declined for the third year in a row, with an estimated 5.3 percent drop from 2008 figures. Property crime continued to fall as well—for a seventh straight year—with an estimated decrease of 4.6 percent. That’s according to our just-released report, Crime in the United States, 2009.

 

These latest statistics come 80 years to the month after we took over the responsibility of compiling and publishing the nation’s crime data from the International Association of Chiefs of Police. The categories back in 1930 were almost identical to what we have today—murder, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, larceny-theft, burglary, and auto theft. (Arson came later.)

FBI,  13th September 2010

Hm. 

Gun sales have been booming ever since Barack Obama's appearance on the presidential campaign trail. Government officials charged with reviewing civilian applications for the purchase of firearms report there was a 50 percent increase in requests for reviews between November 2007 and November 2008.    

Obama's record of supporting gun-control measures gave gun sales another boost after his election November 4th, and sales have continued to rise in the early days of his presidency.

Voice of America Feb. 3rd 2009

Gun sales rise.

Violent crime falls.

A great lie has been perpetrated in the United Kingdom, the Dominions, and it's tried in the USA too, but with far less success. 

IN a nutshell:

"If you give up your right to own weapons, the State will protect you"

I say: 

"Anyone with an iota of sense can see this for the filthy communist lie that it is."

All of the categories of violent crime - murder, rape, robbery, aggravated assault - have exponentially grown since the first real restrictive legislation of weapon ownership was introduced into Britain  - the Firearms Act 1920.

This woman fears no rapist.

Here's the truth: the alleged democracy we live in is nothing more than a thinly veiled tyranny, which likes us all to pretend that the mob rule of democracy makes us 'free'. This of course patently untrue. Britain is under the control of the City of London, and only under the control of the City. Our "democracy" has become a sham, IF it was ever anything different.


Gun ownership was criminalized by the single group that would benefit 100%, using a false argument: 


"Guns cause crime, so we must ban guns".


However, we know guns to be inanimate, dead objects, so that cannot be true. Only sentient human beings can act in a criminal way (it's why we don't take wolves and foxes to court for killing other animals or humans). Removing gun ownership is in reality a punishment not to the criminal, who ignores laws anyway by their very activities as a criminal, but to the law abiding folk, who lose their ability to defend themselves. 

Here's an example of what happens in an unarmed country, with defenseless  people....

A girl who was abducted at the age of 14 and forced to work as a sex slave was yesterday praised for giving evidence which saw her abusers jailed.

The privately-educated teenager was picked up and plied with vodka and drugs, passed around groups of older men for sex and then forced to work as a prostitute.

Her ordeal highlights previously-aired fears that white schoolgirls are being groomed for underage sex by gangs of Asian men in northern England.

UK Enrichment News.

In countries where the Anglo Saxon law prevails - UK, USA and Canad, Australia and New Zealand - we are considered INNOCENT until PROVEN GUILTY, the cornerstone of the liberties we allegedly have. 


So therefore, ownership of a gun, knife, brick or club, per se, does not make you a CRIMINAL. Only the act of criminal behaviour - stabbing someone, shooting someone, raping someone, robbing someone - is someone guilty of committing a crime.


We know that CRIMINALS commit criminal acts, and not guns. Therefore CRIMINALS, once  prosecuted, and found guilty should receive the punishment fit to their acts, not the innocent who have done nothing wrong. 


Here's  the truth: 


The powerful want to keep you defenseless. They want the violence rape and murder on the streets. They want you terrified. Keep being scared, and you're not watching what they are really up to. 

These Elite leaders of the Western folk - from Seattle Glasgow, from Wellington to Calgary - are terrified that if enough people work out that we are part of a dictatorship, owned and operated by Lucifer worshiping political psychopaths, we may want to overthrow them. 

Free people can own weapons, slaves may have them issued in times of war, but slaves have no right to own them through free choice. That was the truth in the Roman Empire, and that is how it is today. Anyone who cannot freely purchase and own a gun is a SLAVE.